This past week GAW has been under heavy shill attack, pushing division on anything having to do with the pedo groomer issue. Too many pedes took their bait! Would you love to see fewer crazy/gay/whatever stickies on GAW? DEPORT! And leave the shills and other assorted losers to your mod team! THX!
(media.greatawakening.win)
π Toruble Maker π
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (118)
sorted by:
Can I get a rundown of what the parties involved advocated for?
Was it "Kill the Gays" vs "Stop the Division"?
Did the "Kill the Gays" advocate for killing gay people for the crimes of pedophiles and the "Stop the Division" folks called them out on it?
Or was there a swathe of "Gays did Nothing Wrong" folk flooding to try and coax out the "Kill the Gay" people into a firefight?
Was it something like that?
Personally, I'm taking the libertarian stance:
It's not a crime to be gay. It is a crime to sexually abuse minors.
When you sexually abuse minors, it doesn't matter if you're gay -- you've committed a crime and need to be punished.
Punishment before the crime is tyranny. Imprisoning, banning, attacking, and killing anyone because they claim to be gay or show gay tendencies is a slippery slope to allowing the Government to spy on us to determine if we are gay.
The only way to enforce anti-gay legislation is to allow the Government into our homes.
And when the Government is given permission to enter our private places, they will NEVER leave.
And then vilify you on everything you do.
Because the Government is the Enemy of the People.
Only laws that can be enforced should be enforced.
Everything else is an infringement on our Rights.
Basically, a bunch of shill handshake accounts started trying to say we all wanted to commit a gay genocide because we find homosexuality immoral and several of us were calling for a slave-bloc style ban on gay advertising and propagation. So no feds kicking in your door for being queer, but also no gays allowed on TV, no gay clubs in schools, gay bars have to convert to normal bars, etc. etc.
As you pointed out, it's impossible to outlaw being gay without going full islamist and murdering people. Which none of us want or called for. Most of us just want an end to the queer propaganda and indoctrination, and want everything that should be private to be private.
In fact, I even made a point in the comments that I'd be fine with a blanket ban on anything sexual or that can be construed as sexually propagandistic in public, regardless of it's gay, straight, etc.
But as usual, when someone tries to have an adult conversation, the shills come in and ruin everything and it turned into a partial dumpster fire with like, 4 or 5 accounts starting arguments about how we're calling for a gay genocide without anyone actually doing so, while others started denying Pizza Gate out of nowhere.
It wasn't a failure by any means in my eyes, but it was very heated thanks to a handful of moronic shills.
Holy. That's a great synopsis.
Lol catsfive likes holycathole π. Tell me you donβt see the humor here β€οΈβ€οΈπ
Interesting. I never saw the gay genocide comments. Just people wanting to fascistically control homosexuals.
I pretty much agree with this. The exception being events like Mardi Gras or Fantasy Fest, however those events take place in places that already have established degeneracy trends and as long as there is plenty of public notice, they should be allowed to remain.
But as a general rule, I agree. The public square should be modest. If you're going to town, men and women alike should be expected to wear shorts and a t-shirt even if they're "going for a run". In certain parks we can maybe relax those rules, as long as there are other parks where families who want to remain more modest can hang out and enjoy as well. Or we can do a schedule- point is, we're Americans. We discuss. We compromise. We do not force our values or way of life on anyone and in return, we resist those who try to.
I have read this 3 times trying to understand the down votes. Nothing I read in this comment is unreasonable. Far from it.
Nope. Christian fundamentalists in this group think they can band together and mass downvote me.
Means nothing without a proper and articulated rebuttal.
Yeah, mostly that. What I thought was extremely telling was a few of the very outspoken pro-gay accts yesterday have a long history of dooming and also calling for pitchforks & torches.
At best, TD refugees who are still muddled and wracked by their own egos, driven by years (now) of implanted opinion.
Or... these accts were created to infiltrate, subvert, and insert cause/effect inclinations and strategem.
I won't name names, those that recognize the history of patterns invoked by these accts will see it easily enough.
Yeah I think we need to start naming names. Not as an absolution solution, every account needs to be allowed to explain themselves.
We also need to return to 40,000 feet in all our discussions. Never assume someone's intent with sharing their ideas unless it's stupid obvious. Otherwise, a lot of context and tone can be lost in these discussions and we need to remember to be patent with each other.
I am interested in killing no one. I am only interested in justice, REAL justice for those who deserve it. And that's it. If we disagree, plenty of planet for everyone, and hopefully more planets for more space to spread out on.