That’s a big general statement you made there. Can you convert it into how it specifically applies to what Desmet is saying?
I believe the first 3/4 of this interview Desmet was speaking of the behavioral science behind the mechanism of Mass Formation.
The last 1/4 was more towards the conditions that make Mass Formation possible. Pride in thinking everything can be rationalized and controlled when in reality very little can be rationalized. To understand the rest of reality we have emphatically resonate with it. Which I equated to mean spiritual discernment. Also, the loneliness of not acknowledging our need for spiritual fulfillment and trying rationalize it instead of acknowledging our connection to a personal god.
He illustrates this by paraphrasing Nobel scientists that recognized the limits of rationalization and their understanding of reality but were able to go further only by acknowledging their ignorance and humbling themselves to resonate with a spiritual God.
I mostly agree but you lost me at the part where you say “they” (psychologists) gave the cabal a template to control us. Your pretense was that psychology is a bunch of phony BS. How do you go from phony BS to a template that works at controlling us?
I think psychology is BS because it ignores our spiritual being and try’s to rationalize our whole self through our physical material self. Which as Desmet proposes the material part of reality is a very limited part of the the human experience. He continues that only emphatically resonating (spiritual discernment in my view) is the only way to understand beyond the very limited visible material reality.
That’s a big general statement you made there. Can you convert it into how it specifically applies to what Desmet is saying?
I believe the first 3/4 of this interview Desmet was speaking of the behavioral science behind the mechanism of Mass Formation.
The last 1/4 was more towards the conditions that make Mass Formation possible. Pride in thinking everything can be rationalized and controlled when in reality very little can be rationalized. To understand the rest of reality we have emphatically resonate with it. Which I equated to mean spiritual discernment. Also, the loneliness of not acknowledging our need for spiritual fulfillment and trying rationalize it instead of acknowledging our connection to a personal god.
He illustrates this by paraphrasing Nobel scientists that recognized the limits of rationalization and their understanding of reality but were able to go further only by acknowledging their ignorance and humbling themselves to resonate with a spiritual God.
It is a big general statement, there is nothing wrong with that. Is there anything in what I posted you don't agree with?
I mostly agree but you lost me at the part where you say “they” (psychologists) gave the cabal a template to control us. Your pretense was that psychology is a bunch of phony BS. How do you go from phony BS to a template that works at controlling us?
I think psychology is BS because it ignores our spiritual being and try’s to rationalize our whole self through our physical material self. Which as Desmet proposes the material part of reality is a very limited part of the the human experience. He continues that only emphatically resonating (spiritual discernment in my view) is the only way to understand beyond the very limited visible material reality.