So, to be a bit contrary here, where is your telegram account, and where are your videos that we can watch to find out what you know?

I mean, kek. You write a man and tell him that you cannot trust a word he says and he replies "fuck you" and you are, what, surprised by that?

And how is someone choosing to focus on and share their particular views on a topic somehow supposed to ..."control their ... account ... so that no one finds out truths ....."? I mean, you're basically asserting that the man is a DS agent, and is being deliberately deceptive. But, I mean, what is stopping you, or anyone else, going to other sources to get the information (you think) they need?

Anyway, you've got your views, to which you're entitled. Myself, I don't find anything in what you've written that inspires me to consider your view as being anything other than a rather negatively focused outlook.

I was thinking about your viewpoint this afternoon. So here are some key points that I personally consider to be key, critical factors when I engage or develop views on people sharing their views (truth?):

1. Understanding of "the truth" is a spectrum on which all people exist, from very little to a lot, but no one knows nothing and no one knows everything.

2. People do not need to be perfect in their perspectives in order to share something of value.

3. Intention and purpose are invisible, subjective factors, but can essentially be categorized into either more egoically driven (emotionally over-charged, self-identified, self-serving or programming-driven) or more awareness driven (highly reflective of self, humbler, unassuming, open and intention to serve the whole or a purpose higher than one's self).

4. Motivation and intention (whether conscious or unconscious) are a more key and central factor than information and data. Good data can be used for the wrong reasons, and bad data can be shared in ignorance but for the right reasons.

The dividing point in our society and world centers on No. 3 above. But like understanding (1.), the range here is a spectrum on which more or less weight leans one way or the other. Nonetheless, despite being a spectrum, location on that spectrum defines real value in the world.

Me? I'm OK with Clif High. Based on the 4 factors above, I'm OK with Clif.

If you're pissed off with someone, and you 'cant stand' someone, then you might want to ask, why internal programming is driving you to respond and react in this way. Why are your emotions engaged here? Is that engagement helpful or unhelpful?

Anyway, seems pretty darn clear to me that there is more here than just your 'not having an agenda except to share the truth'. But each to his own.

Cheers.