Are pharmacists supposed to be able to produce documentation, as in point to actual studies that are flagged and ready to go, when they make claims like this? Is it medically ethical to say that it’s “fake news” that it wasn’t tested on humans, when it was not actually tested on humans? Can this be grounds for a massive lawsuit? RICO-style?
Are pharmacists supposed to be able to produce documentation, as in point to actual studies that are flagged and ready to go, when they make claims like this? Is it medically ethical to say that it’s “fake news” that it wasn’t tested on humans, when it was not actually tested on humans? Can this be grounds for a massive lawsuit? RICO-style?