Anons need to know how big a deal Rosemary's Baby symbology is. It ties into Hollywood pedophilia, it ties into Charles Manson. It ties into the child sacrifice system of Clown World as a whole.
Looks like there's British royalty symbology involved as well by way of Uranus.
"They were having grand jury Proceedings and on March 24th 1977, testifying about the night of March 10th, 1977, the victim talked about how it wasn’t just Roman Polanski, but there were 5 people there as well.
So, because there are plants at every level of the DOJ and the people with those plants are the ones most interested in hearing the secret details… how are these details relayed.
Critical Thinking: What would happen if someone inside the DOJ openly spilled the beans of the details of the case? They’d be fired/arrested! This is why symbolism is used to send comms. Hiding it in plain sight in places the public can’t verify.
This is why instead of saying “Roman Polanski on March 10th” they had a scientist say “Uranus on March 10th” and instead of saying “5 people involved outside of Polanski” they said “5 rings discovered”
For example, originally Uranus was known as “King George’s star” because this was when the U.S.A. became into being and so at the time Royals were rejecting the claim.
Don’t misunderstand tho. This doesn’t mean Uranus or its rings don’t exist, real things are used to send comms just as fake things are. I always default to things being real when possible because there’s no reason not to.
Anyway, once the name was changed from the British King’s property to “Uranus” it gained the symbolism of people being controlled by sex. Specifically castration and overthrow. Which is the core story of Uranus.
Understand now why they would choose Uranus to send a comm about Roman Polanski? "
Someone was discussing how his dumb boss’ thinking ability was largely limited to analogies. The employee said he countered by using other analogies, which he described as an unlimited resource.
“real things are used to send comms just as fake things are. I always default to things being real when possible because there’s no reason not to.”
There are so many possible analogies to draw upon to compare to a real story, that using fake things for comms is pretty lazy. Unless being discovered as fake is a comm itself. Normally they should be clever with using the real things.
What the public isn't aware of is how singular, how controlled our information regarding astronomy is. We are fed information via Astronomical Societies. We are fed information via NASA. Even our photography of our friggin Earth is monopolized.
I can only sympathize with non-Clown geniuses in the field, like Youtuber SuspiciousObservers. One inanity he constantly runs up against is the idea of "dark matter" and "black holes" being thrown around willy nilly, and told to be present near every star system.
He's essentially trying to reconcile a Comm sent from the 90s regarding Bill Clinton's affairs with actual logic. So much frustration this will cause to the genius non-Comms Aware mind.
High IQ people are usually more moral and honest because of their enhanced ability for abstract thinking. They can easily imagine themselves in others’ positions so there’s an intuitive grasp of the importance of the golden rule. High IQs can imagine the benefits of universal honesty, so they set a standard for themselves to be honest. If the person isn’t yet jaded, the person unfortunately also has a tendency to project honesty onto others. This can lead to gullibility. To an honest high IQ, the idea of faking something as important as an astronomical report is beyond reason. The genius unaware of comms is in for a bumpy ride.
The dark matter stuff is weird, but I’m open minded to the idea of a supermassive black hole at the center of each spiral galaxy. There’s probably some strong gravity causing all those stars to spiral, right?
It is true that a lot of our info about space comes from NASA, but there are several other competing space agencies as well. The EU, India, China, and Russia all have space programs, so if NASA put out false info at least one of the other agencies could debunk the claim. China and Russia in particular would gleefully take the opportunity to publicly embarrass NASA if it put out bad info.
To your comments on dark matter and black holes, we can be reasonably confident that black holes exist. They don’t violate the laws of physics, they’ve been theorized to exist for decades, there are regions of space that behave as if black holes are there, and now we have photographs of them. Dark matter, on the other hand, is purely an invention of evolutionists because the current distribution of galaxies and galaxy clusters doesn’t match with what would be expected from the Big Bang. Dark matter/energy are attempts to fix a fundamentally broken Big Bang Theory because modern science considers any alternative to evolution unacceptable. That’s why dark matter/energy are allegedly completely undetectable and have no evidence supporting them; they don’t actually exist.
Not saying space related news isn’t used to send comms, it may very well be the case. Just adding my two cents.
The EU, India, China, and Russia all have space programs, so if NASA put out false info at least one of the other agencies could debunk the claim. China and Russia in particular would gleefully take the opportunity to publicly embarrass NASA if it put out bad info.
"Every major technological accomplishment in history is always repeated over & over again with rapid improvements. Consider:
40 years after Columbus landed on America? Thousands had followed
40 years after Transatlantic flight in 1919? Thousands had followed.
40 years after the first Satellite Shot in space 1957? Thousands had followed.
And yet 40 years after man walks on the moon? Not a single person or country has followed, nor even attempted to do so! Does that not seem strange and illogical?
In some places the perspective on what happened is quite different than here.
It is a mistake to think that "China" and "Russia" (I am hesitant to homogenize nation states into a single actor) have something to gain from openly "embarrassing" the Pyramid/Clowns. You underestimate Mockingbird Media control of every Western Country + every Country who doesn't want to draw negative attention to itself. The country would be effectively branded as more backwards than North Korea, the report itself propaganda stemming from an Inferiority Complex, or simply never mentioned. Like that 24% Russian factoid.
There was absolutely nothing to be gained and everything to lose by attempting to humiliate Clowns. Certainly pre-2019.
Again, Q said "Truth would send 99% to the hospital". You don't get to that % without fundamental beliefs of our world and our history being stripped away.
“Every major technological accomplishment in history is always repeated over and over”
Every accomplishment you listed has direct economic or personal benefits, hence why others followed suit. Coming to the Americas provided land, natural resources, and religious liberty. Transatlantic flight provided travel and business opportunities. Satellites provide communication, navigation, and military intelligence. Going to the Moon had some benefits, such as increased scientific understanding of our solar system, but not as many personal benefits as the other accomplishments you listed.
Americans have physically landed on the Moon 6 times, with 30 total missions to the moon ( the other 24 missions orbited the Moon). Russia/USSR has had 23 missions to the Moon, all of theirs being orbital. China landed a rover on the Moon in 2007, and India has orbited the Moon twice in 2008 and 2019. Your assertion that no one has been to the Moon after the first moon landing is false.
If MSM was as powerful as you say it is then you yourself wouldn’t know about the 24% or Russians stat that you cite. Every MSM narrative that has been fielded in the past 2 years has been debunked in weeks if not days or hours. Covid origins, Covid jabs, election fraud, the truth about Ukraine; it has all been debunked by ordinary people doing their own research, often without any funding. The MSM is not nearly as good at censoring the truth as you think it is.
Also, whether 24% of Russians believe the Moon landing is fake is irrelevant. Belief doesn’t matter, what matters is whether you have evidence and sound reasoning. And when it comes to Moon landing denial (and also flat earthers), they have neither. All their arguments ultimately boil down to: “I don’t like NASA, therefore everything they say is a lie. Also I don’t have to provide any evidence, and if you contradict me then you’re and idiot or a NASA shill”.
When Q talked about the truth sending people to the hospital, it’s more reasonable to suspect he’s talking about everyone in government/entertainment being Satan-worshipping pedophiles who orchestrated 9/11. There’s far more evidence for that than for the Moon landing being fake or the earth being flat.
Also, the building is important. It was parodied in "Ghostbusters" for being a locus of Evil (yes, "Capital E").
I don't believe that steel and rock can have Evil in it, but also I always allow for the possibility that this mudman (me) doesn't fucking get it and that those things are real.
What does seem to be real is that that building has a long history of weird shit happening in it, like murders, people walking off the top of it, people being killed on the street in front of it, etc.
Since satan knows he must have an Antichrist ready for the day, he does not know when that day will be, thus at all times there will be a potential Antichrist waiting in the wings - even if that person is not conscious of it.
Thus over the years we have seen many cited as the AntiChrist yet time passes and they leave the stage - to be replaced by another/others.
The AntiChrist when he comes will be the one to agree a deal between Israel and the in main the Palestinians that they can commence sacrifice on Temple Mount - up to that point - and indeed for those not aware of Daniel 9:24-27 & 12:1-13 until 3.5 years later - this person will seem as some sort of peace bringing hero. Only those understanding Biblical Prophecy will be aware of the true nature.
I understand and agree with what you are saying, I was just being obnoxious because every time I say that William is the result of a hundreds of years old breeding program (Royal Order of the Garter), was conceived in the supposedly most evil/haunted castle (Balmoral) on a specific day for some Satanic reason, only to be born on the longest eclipse of the year which happened to fall on the summer solstice, I get attacked with "muh proof", despite the obvious Rosemary's Baby symbolism. There is no proof other than interpreting their symbolism. It is just obvious that that is what they believe, and it makes sense since the Balfour Declaration that created/set the stage for the creation of Israel retained the right to place a British royal on the throne as King of Israel. I personally believe that even though he may be the combination of the 13 bloodlines and all the above, but if nobody recieves/likes him can he really be "THE" AntiChrist? Which lines up with what you are saying.
The only proof ever as to who the antichrist is will be when the deal is agreed for Israel to commence sacrifice - everything else is, and indeed has prooved to be conjecture.
Diana left the same hospital and in a red dress when Prince Harry was born. It pegs the "troublemaker" child. Louis is to be the family headache. The one who is always causing "problems".
Not really, hers looks like a red overcoat over a white blouse, not a red dress with a lace collar. Quite the difference from wearing an exact match of Satan's mother from a 70s cult flick lol
Anons need to know how big a deal Rosemary's Baby symbology is. It ties into Hollywood pedophilia, it ties into Charles Manson. It ties into the child sacrifice system of Clown World as a whole.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/roman-polanski-science-and-christmas-comms/
Ties in with Roman Polanski and Quentin Tarantino and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and Leo DiCaprio and global warming sacrifice cults and …
Looks like there's British royalty symbology involved as well by way of Uranus.
"They were having grand jury Proceedings and on March 24th 1977, testifying about the night of March 10th, 1977, the victim talked about how it wasn’t just Roman Polanski, but there were 5 people there as well.
So, because there are plants at every level of the DOJ and the people with those plants are the ones most interested in hearing the secret details… how are these details relayed.
Critical Thinking: What would happen if someone inside the DOJ openly spilled the beans of the details of the case? They’d be fired/arrested! This is why symbolism is used to send comms. Hiding it in plain sight in places the public can’t verify.
This is why instead of saying “Roman Polanski on March 10th” they had a scientist say “Uranus on March 10th” and instead of saying “5 people involved outside of Polanski” they said “5 rings discovered”
For example, originally Uranus was known as “King George’s star” because this was when the U.S.A. became into being and so at the time Royals were rejecting the claim.
Don’t misunderstand tho. This doesn’t mean Uranus or its rings don’t exist, real things are used to send comms just as fake things are. I always default to things being real when possible because there’s no reason not to.
Anyway, once the name was changed from the British King’s property to “Uranus” it gained the symbolism of people being controlled by sex. Specifically castration and overthrow. Which is the core story of Uranus.
Understand now why they would choose Uranus to send a comm about Roman Polanski? "
Someone was discussing how his dumb boss’ thinking ability was largely limited to analogies. The employee said he countered by using other analogies, which he described as an unlimited resource.
“real things are used to send comms just as fake things are. I always default to things being real when possible because there’s no reason not to.”
There are so many possible analogies to draw upon to compare to a real story, that using fake things for comms is pretty lazy. Unless being discovered as fake is a comm itself. Normally they should be clever with using the real things.
What the public isn't aware of is how singular, how controlled our information regarding astronomy is. We are fed information via Astronomical Societies. We are fed information via NASA. Even our photography of our friggin Earth is monopolized.
I can only sympathize with non-Clown geniuses in the field, like Youtuber SuspiciousObservers. One inanity he constantly runs up against is the idea of "dark matter" and "black holes" being thrown around willy nilly, and told to be present near every star system.
He's essentially trying to reconcile a Comm sent from the 90s regarding Bill Clinton's affairs with actual logic. So much frustration this will cause to the genius non-Comms Aware mind.
High IQ people are usually more moral and honest because of their enhanced ability for abstract thinking. They can easily imagine themselves in others’ positions so there’s an intuitive grasp of the importance of the golden rule. High IQs can imagine the benefits of universal honesty, so they set a standard for themselves to be honest. If the person isn’t yet jaded, the person unfortunately also has a tendency to project honesty onto others. This can lead to gullibility. To an honest high IQ, the idea of faking something as important as an astronomical report is beyond reason. The genius unaware of comms is in for a bumpy ride.
The dark matter stuff is weird, but I’m open minded to the idea of a supermassive black hole at the center of each spiral galaxy. There’s probably some strong gravity causing all those stars to spiral, right?
Makes sense
imagine a star so big, that not even light can escape from it. What if supermassive black holes are just supermassive stars?
It is true that a lot of our info about space comes from NASA, but there are several other competing space agencies as well. The EU, India, China, and Russia all have space programs, so if NASA put out false info at least one of the other agencies could debunk the claim. China and Russia in particular would gleefully take the opportunity to publicly embarrass NASA if it put out bad info.
To your comments on dark matter and black holes, we can be reasonably confident that black holes exist. They don’t violate the laws of physics, they’ve been theorized to exist for decades, there are regions of space that behave as if black holes are there, and now we have photographs of them. Dark matter, on the other hand, is purely an invention of evolutionists because the current distribution of galaxies and galaxy clusters doesn’t match with what would be expected from the Big Bang. Dark matter/energy are attempts to fix a fundamentally broken Big Bang Theory because modern science considers any alternative to evolution unacceptable. That’s why dark matter/energy are allegedly completely undetectable and have no evidence supporting them; they don’t actually exist.
Not saying space related news isn’t used to send comms, it may very well be the case. Just adding my two cents.
"Every major technological accomplishment in history is always repeated over & over again with rapid improvements. Consider:
40 years after Columbus landed on America? Thousands had followed
40 years after Transatlantic flight in 1919? Thousands had followed.
40 years after the first Satellite Shot in space 1957? Thousands had followed.
And yet 40 years after man walks on the moon? Not a single person or country has followed, nor even attempted to do so! Does that not seem strange and illogical?
In some places the perspective on what happened is quite different than here.
07/27/2018 Only 24 percent of Russians believe that American astronauts landed on the moon https://sputniknews.com/science/201807271066736384-russians-polled-on-moon-landings/
So which country is right?"
It is a mistake to think that "China" and "Russia" (I am hesitant to homogenize nation states into a single actor) have something to gain from openly "embarrassing" the Pyramid/Clowns. You underestimate Mockingbird Media control of every Western Country + every Country who doesn't want to draw negative attention to itself. The country would be effectively branded as more backwards than North Korea, the report itself propaganda stemming from an Inferiority Complex, or simply never mentioned. Like that 24% Russian factoid.
There was absolutely nothing to be gained and everything to lose by attempting to humiliate Clowns. Certainly pre-2019.
Again, Q said "Truth would send 99% to the hospital". You don't get to that % without fundamental beliefs of our world and our history being stripped away.
“Every major technological accomplishment in history is always repeated over and over”
Every accomplishment you listed has direct economic or personal benefits, hence why others followed suit. Coming to the Americas provided land, natural resources, and religious liberty. Transatlantic flight provided travel and business opportunities. Satellites provide communication, navigation, and military intelligence. Going to the Moon had some benefits, such as increased scientific understanding of our solar system, but not as many personal benefits as the other accomplishments you listed.
Americans have physically landed on the Moon 6 times, with 30 total missions to the moon ( the other 24 missions orbited the Moon). Russia/USSR has had 23 missions to the Moon, all of theirs being orbital. China landed a rover on the Moon in 2007, and India has orbited the Moon twice in 2008 and 2019. Your assertion that no one has been to the Moon after the first moon landing is false.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/09/which-countries-moon
“You underestimate Mockingbird Media”
If MSM was as powerful as you say it is then you yourself wouldn’t know about the 24% or Russians stat that you cite. Every MSM narrative that has been fielded in the past 2 years has been debunked in weeks if not days or hours. Covid origins, Covid jabs, election fraud, the truth about Ukraine; it has all been debunked by ordinary people doing their own research, often without any funding. The MSM is not nearly as good at censoring the truth as you think it is.
Also, whether 24% of Russians believe the Moon landing is fake is irrelevant. Belief doesn’t matter, what matters is whether you have evidence and sound reasoning. And when it comes to Moon landing denial (and also flat earthers), they have neither. All their arguments ultimately boil down to: “I don’t like NASA, therefore everything they say is a lie. Also I don’t have to provide any evidence, and if you contradict me then you’re and idiot or a NASA shill”.
When Q talked about the truth sending people to the hospital, it’s more reasonable to suspect he’s talking about everyone in government/entertainment being Satan-worshipping pedophiles who orchestrated 9/11. There’s far more evidence for that than for the Moon landing being fake or the earth being flat.
Also, the building is important. It was parodied in "Ghostbusters" for being a locus of Evil (yes, "Capital E").
I don't believe that steel and rock can have Evil in it, but also I always allow for the possibility that this mudman (me) doesn't fucking get it and that those things are real.
What does seem to be real is that that building has a long history of weird shit happening in it, like murders, people walking off the top of it, people being killed on the street in front of it, etc.
"The Dakota".
https://maps.roadtrippers.com/us/new-york-ny/points-of-interest/rosemarys-baby-apartment
I suspect that that is an HQ of a sort, for Satanists, in NYC.
Such a good rabbit hole. Thanks
I wAnT tO sEe YoUr PrOoF tHaT tHe RoYaLs BeLiEvE wIlLiAm iS tHe AnTiChRiSt
Since satan knows he must have an Antichrist ready for the day, he does not know when that day will be, thus at all times there will be a potential Antichrist waiting in the wings - even if that person is not conscious of it.
Thus over the years we have seen many cited as the AntiChrist yet time passes and they leave the stage - to be replaced by another/others.
The AntiChrist when he comes will be the one to agree a deal between Israel and the in main the Palestinians that they can commence sacrifice on Temple Mount - up to that point - and indeed for those not aware of Daniel 9:24-27 & 12:1-13 until 3.5 years later - this person will seem as some sort of peace bringing hero. Only those understanding Biblical Prophecy will be aware of the true nature.
I understand and agree with what you are saying, I was just being obnoxious because every time I say that William is the result of a hundreds of years old breeding program (Royal Order of the Garter), was conceived in the supposedly most evil/haunted castle (Balmoral) on a specific day for some Satanic reason, only to be born on the longest eclipse of the year which happened to fall on the summer solstice, I get attacked with "muh proof", despite the obvious Rosemary's Baby symbolism. There is no proof other than interpreting their symbolism. It is just obvious that that is what they believe, and it makes sense since the Balfour Declaration that created/set the stage for the creation of Israel retained the right to place a British royal on the throne as King of Israel. I personally believe that even though he may be the combination of the 13 bloodlines and all the above, but if nobody recieves/likes him can he really be "THE" AntiChrist? Which lines up with what you are saying.
The only proof ever as to who the antichrist is will be when the deal is agreed for Israel to commence sacrifice - everything else is, and indeed has prooved to be conjecture.
Good catch.
Ive seen this. Kate doesn't choose everything she wears. Ill bet this dress was brought by the handlers for the 'leaving the hospital photo op.'
I assumed her handlers did this on purpose because they hate her.
Maybe it’s Veruca Salt she’s emulating.
🐸❤
https://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/royal-style/20220910150716/kate-middleton-tribute-princess-diana-style-photo-comparisons/
Yeah, people make these memes without bothering to spell anything correctly, making us all look like a bunch of retards if we share them.
https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/kate-middletons-baby-reveal-dress-likened-to-rosemarys-baby-frock-on-twitter
Diana left the same hospital and in a red dress when Prince Harry was born. It pegs the "troublemaker" child. Louis is to be the family headache. The one who is always causing "problems".
Louis... Lucifer?
A play on phonetics.
Kendrick Lamar seems to refer to Lucifer in his lyrics, "The evils of Lucy was all around me"...
Lady Di too
https://ibb.co/zJfDZX8
Not really, hers looks like a red overcoat over a white blouse, not a red dress with a lace collar. Quite the difference from wearing an exact match of Satan's mother from a 70s cult flick lol
Exactly what you're supposed to believe. Normies are too stupid to believe anything else.
awww, its the antichrist.
Nice spelling on your picture.