Christmas trees are evil, huh? I think this is taking 1 selection of the Bible out of context, not considering the original text + translation, and really the biggest reason (back-to-the-basics to keep-it-stupid-simple), it boils down to the sin of idolatry. If you value a Christmas tree over Christ, it is a sin. If you use the tree, the "Christmas spirit" to proclaim Jesus the Christ, when people's hearts are more open, then absolutely go for it! It's (like many things) a matter of the heart.
EDIT: I used interpretation instead of translation, which made the comment confusing.
I don't agree with everything this woman has to say, particularly as I am an atheist who doesn't hate anyone (more annoyed/angry with my fellow man for being sheep), but needless to say, something is afoot.
Edit: Additionally, the phrase "revelation of the method" is in this book. In the past, I had purchased this book to verify.
Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Michael Hoffman
You watched a "purportedly" live broadcast of a moving image on a channel of main stream media that is aided and abetted by the intelligence community, a channel known for its bias, that is dedicated to pushing narratives, and you call bullshit? It is difficult to admit to yourself, but you have been hoodwinked.
There's a guy who dove deep into this, explaining HOW it was done. Adding in filters in live filming. This is reportedly WHY all of the OG footage had significant lighting differences in the building compared to the sky. Building was much darker, making the light layers easier to navigate the plane into. All they had to do was set the vertical filter in the right location, so the make believe plane didn't cross the building and keep allegedly flying afterwards (which reportedly happened on Fox News helicopter footage).
The possibility of the plane colliding into the building does seem quite far-fetched.
I've looked at the CGI plane theory. If we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job, explosives were used for controlled demolition, and the deep state grabbed power and money as a result, I don't think it matters if the planes were real or faked.
Nope. You're proposing that a live newscast was involved in a vast conspiracy to broadcast a FAKE video of a plane crashing into a WTC tower. That is utter nonsense.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. To not question something because many people believe it to be true is stupid. If you seek the truth and find it, you can have a sure foundation, not just other's talking points. I personally think it's a globe earth, but I could be convinced that it is actually flat, with supporting science. I have heard arguments from both sides, considered the facts and resources, and I have come up with my own conclusion. If I go to the pearly gates and God asks why I believed the earth was a globe when he says it was flat, I'd respond with, you right God, my bad. I wouldn't argue my point with him. (unlikely that it will be a point of discussion anyways, but I digress)
You believe one “conspiracy theory” therefore you believe them all theory.
Instead, each theory should be weighted out on its own. Each theory deserves to be explored, so long as their a rationale behind it.
You seek to extinguish discussion, that’s a losing point. You do nothing but strengthen our resolve -> to seek the truth.
If a flat earther believes the earth is flat based on science and logics, then he is seeking truth. Whether or not he is misguided is a separate conversation. He could be persuaded provided more compelling evidence is shown for a globe earth. If a flat earther doesn’t care about facts and logics, then he is that of a cult minded koolaid drinking type. He is useless, no amount of information will persuade and dissuade him. The same is true in the opposite direction.
Not everyone cares all that much about the shape of the earth, they want a norm, and that’s enough for them. But they deeply care about other issues.
You are desiring to stir up strife. For that I will be reporting your comment to the mods. You have no interest in edifying this community, but only feeling vindicated by your talking points. What does it matter to you if people want to question the validity of 9-11? Are you afraid it will destroy your world view?
No. I watched for hours on CNBC. There is simply no way that coverage could have been faked. And cellphones were in their infancy when the towers were struck. The first cellphone with a camera was released in Korea in the year 2000:
Christmas trees are evil, huh? I think this is taking 1 selection of the Bible out of context, not considering the original text + translation, and really the biggest reason (back-to-the-basics to keep-it-stupid-simple), it boils down to the sin of idolatry. If you value a Christmas tree over Christ, it is a sin. If you use the tree, the "Christmas spirit" to proclaim Jesus the Christ, when people's hearts are more open, then absolutely go for it! It's (like many things) a matter of the heart.
EDIT: I used interpretation instead of translation, which made the comment confusing.
Symbolism? KEK
Now we know why Q has put such emphasis on the watch posts.
Yeah. I would think so.
This will fuck you up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY
BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11
I don't agree with everything this woman has to say, particularly as I am an atheist who doesn't hate anyone (more annoyed/angry with my fellow man for being sheep), but needless to say, something is afoot.
Edit: Additionally, the phrase "revelation of the method" is in this book. In the past, I had purchased this book to verify.
Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Michael Hoffman
Oh yes. I know about the book. I have not read it but I heard about it. Thanks fren.
The woman in the video says that there were no planes used on 9/11. Complete bullshit. I was watching live on CNBC as the second plane hit.
You watched a "purportedly" live broadcast of a moving image on a channel of main stream media that is aided and abetted by the intelligence community, a channel known for its bias, that is dedicated to pushing narratives, and you call bullshit? It is difficult to admit to yourself, but you have been hoodwinked.
There's a guy who dove deep into this, explaining HOW it was done. Adding in filters in live filming. This is reportedly WHY all of the OG footage had significant lighting differences in the building compared to the sky. Building was much darker, making the light layers easier to navigate the plane into. All they had to do was set the vertical filter in the right location, so the make believe plane didn't cross the building and keep allegedly flying afterwards (which reportedly happened on Fox News helicopter footage).
The possibility of the plane colliding into the building does seem quite far-fetched.
I've looked at the CGI plane theory. If we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job, explosives were used for controlled demolition, and the deep state grabbed power and money as a result, I don't think it matters if the planes were real or faked.
You're on the right track.
We need to stop arguing the "how?" and get into the "why?"
Planes, no plans, remote controlled, Saudi controlled, thermite, nuclear... None of this matters. The end result does .
So what was there to gain by orchestrating this catastrophe?
^This
Nope. You're proposing that a live newscast was involved in a vast conspiracy to broadcast a FAKE video of a plane crashing into a WTC tower. That is utter nonsense.
I am not alone in this proposal, have a nice day and continue watching television for all the real information.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. To not question something because many people believe it to be true is stupid. If you seek the truth and find it, you can have a sure foundation, not just other's talking points. I personally think it's a globe earth, but I could be convinced that it is actually flat, with supporting science. I have heard arguments from both sides, considered the facts and resources, and I have come up with my own conclusion. If I go to the pearly gates and God asks why I believed the earth was a globe when he says it was flat, I'd respond with, you right God, my bad. I wouldn't argue my point with him. (unlikely that it will be a point of discussion anyways, but I digress)
You believe one “conspiracy theory” therefore you believe them all theory.
Instead, each theory should be weighted out on its own. Each theory deserves to be explored, so long as their a rationale behind it.
You seek to extinguish discussion, that’s a losing point. You do nothing but strengthen our resolve -> to seek the truth.
If a flat earther believes the earth is flat based on science and logics, then he is seeking truth. Whether or not he is misguided is a separate conversation. He could be persuaded provided more compelling evidence is shown for a globe earth. If a flat earther doesn’t care about facts and logics, then he is that of a cult minded koolaid drinking type. He is useless, no amount of information will persuade and dissuade him. The same is true in the opposite direction.
Not everyone cares all that much about the shape of the earth, they want a norm, and that’s enough for them. But they deeply care about other issues.
You are desiring to stir up strife. For that I will be reporting your comment to the mods. You have no interest in edifying this community, but only feeling vindicated by your talking points. What does it matter to you if people want to question the validity of 9-11? Are you afraid it will destroy your world view?
I don't agree on every point she made either, but there's a lot of coincidences for 911 that cannot be explained away.
But the remark about no planes makes her seem to be a loon, much less credible.
Any chance possible it's a cgi? Do you know whether anyone was there with a cell phone video? I have not heard.
No. I watched for hours on CNBC. There is simply no way that coverage could have been faked. And cellphones were in their infancy when the towers were struck. The first cellphone with a camera was released in Korea in the year 2000:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/camera-phone-history/
I will take it that she is wrong on no plane until something else come along.
https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
Oh this is good.
I have not seen this one. What an amazing report.