As titled; the US house of usurpers just passed an act attacking the original Electoral Count Act of 1887, apparently at the behest of their fraudulent "January 6 committee" and they did this specifically to "prevent another Jan. 6."
The senate also has their own version...AND 10 "REPUBLICAN" SENATORS SUPPORTING IT!!!!!!!!
This is absolute fucking lunacy and sheer evil. I'm fucking enraged.
If these faggots "won fair & square in the most secure, free & fair election in history" WHY THE FUCK ARE THEY LITERALLY CHANGING OUR ENTIRE VOTING SYSTEM???
That's not to even mention the fact they unleashed an entire God damned biowewapon upon the planet to give them an excuse to ram through mail-in voting and drastically alter how votes are counted and ballots are handled.
WINNERS DO NOT SEEK TO CHANGE THE RULES OF THE GAME!!!!!!!
LINKS:
(Sorry; IDK if we are not supposed to use archive.org, but I tried archive.is and both times I tried, it literally said I was 1,500 in queue..... no joke.....)
Another archive with more info, specifically about the senate's version:
######## ..
EDITED TO ADD::
***Hey shoot frens; you know what; I just realized that I accidentally used the word "COLLEGE" in the title, where it should have been "COUNT". ***
The title SHOULD have read "Electoral COUNT Act" and NOT "Electoral COLLEGE Act."
This was an honest mistake on my part.
I see where the title is different from the article & I apologize; it was absolutely NOT intentional and NOT an attempt to get clicks / mislead / mis-inform; just an honest brain fart.
Obviously I was thinking about the Electoral COLLEGE, and typed that instead of "Count."
This IS still extremely significant, however....... none of my other sentiments change based on this one word.
X
This post is extremely misleading. Title says electoral college reform - this is the electoral count act. Not the same thing. Electoral college reform would require amending the constitution.
Am I the only one looking at this differently? This would stop Kamala from interfering in 2024. If you think they wouldn’t let her because they swore Pence couldn’t in 2020, you haven’t been paying attention. They would have her interfere and pretend like they never said a word 4yrs earlier.
"Am I the only one looking at this differently?"
::Looks wistfully off into the night through his bedroom window, as a cartoon thought bubble appears::
"We are watching a movie"
Nope! Not the only one not at all! Keep up the good work Joe & Co!
🤣
Hey shoot you know what; I just realized this and it was an honest mistake.
I see where the title is different from the article & I apologize; it was absolutely NOT intentional and NOT an attempt to get clicks / mislead / mis-inform; just an honest brain fart.
Obviously I was thinking about the Electoral COLLEGE, and typed that instead of "Count."
This IS still extremely significant, however....... none of my other sentiments change based on this one word.
I do believe that maneuver is on page 666 of the Cannanite Playbook.
Yes. Dems still want payback from 1876 and were really the ones pushing well meaning but gullible MAGA to support the misguided theory that President of Senate has the authority to reject certificates Republicans certainly argued that theory in 1876, and it's true that Jefferson basically exercised that authority in 1800 (in 1796 Adams accepted VT, as he should have, and gave opportunity for objections but nobody did). BUT that doesn't necessarily mean that the theory is correct. Presiding officer is to preside in a ministerial manner. Problem is that 12th isn't explicit about the validation of certificates or disputes to them.
Dems were trying to use this theory so that should 2024 come up and they have the VP/POTS then they could say "ha! You said they had that power back in 2020!"