Only read the first page and was amused to read that Pizzagate was a conspiracy theory, but had no mention of the John Podesta emails where the "Pizza related handkerchief map" or the 65,000 dollars worth of hotdogs being flown in from Chicago etc.
Then it mentions something about a statue being demolished and the kidnapping of children, as crimes, along with Jan 6th. Hadn't heard a thing about the first two alleged crimes and I started looking at drops early 2018.
So in essence it's just another hit piece, a report by so called intellectuals for the purpose of being smug and furthering their little lives in some way?
So..... I slogged through the whole document. It says basically nothing, it is bereft of any intellectual substance. My guess is every one of the authors has "future triple Ph.D", or something similarly validating their Dunning-Kruger intellect in their twitter bio. It's like reading another student's paper in an english 102 class where the person has either copied everything from wikipedia or borrowed an idea from someone and "put it in their own words", certainly the paper meets the 7500 word requirement, but it's as hollow as a ping pong ball and about as original as a fart joke.
Very 1st paragraph referred to the "seditious storming of the capital". That's all I needed to read to learn their bias. No thanks. Not going to waste my precious time on BS. Now my frens.....that is not a waste!
Only read the first page and was amused to read that Pizzagate was a conspiracy theory, but had no mention of the John Podesta emails where the "Pizza related handkerchief map" or the 65,000 dollars worth of hotdogs being flown in from Chicago etc.
Then it mentions something about a statue being demolished and the kidnapping of children, as crimes, along with Jan 6th. Hadn't heard a thing about the first two alleged crimes and I started looking at drops early 2018.
So in essence it's just another hit piece, a report by so called intellectuals for the purpose of being smug and furthering their little lives in some way?
So..... I slogged through the whole document. It says basically nothing, it is bereft of any intellectual substance. My guess is every one of the authors has "future triple Ph.D", or something similarly validating their Dunning-Kruger intellect in their twitter bio. It's like reading another student's paper in an english 102 class where the person has either copied everything from wikipedia or borrowed an idea from someone and "put it in their own words", certainly the paper meets the 7500 word requirement, but it's as hollow as a ping pong ball and about as original as a fart joke.
Very 1st paragraph referred to the "seditious storming of the capital". That's all I needed to read to learn their bias. No thanks. Not going to waste my precious time on BS. Now my frens.....that is not a waste!
It must be accurate, it has lots of numbers and colorful graphs......due diligence obviously
I wonder if this helped someone get their PhD in Wokeness.
Fascinating… 🤡
Quelle or Q gospels are the writings of Jesus.