160 () posted 2 years ago by Cucker_Carlson 2 years ago by Cucker_Carlson +160 / -0 39 comments share 39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
A "third" DNA strand is not needed. Viruses are already genetically imprinted on our DNA. That DNA is believed to be inactive/active depending on the paper you read.
Making it active, and playing with it, is not beyond the possible.