If you look at Q post 3417, it starts talking about LDR (Lynn Forester de Rothschild). You can see her here:
https://www.sott.net/image/s17/352044/full/Rothchild_Clinton_.jpg
Q asks how does LDR connect to the Bronfman's? Find the bridge. Think Company.
The answer is Wealthspire Advisors. It is a Rothchild / Bronfman company.
https://www.wealthspire.com/news/nfp-to-acquire-bronfman-rothschild/
The Bronfman that plead guilty is Clare Bronfman. The Bronfman sisters inherited their father's wealth who started the Seagram alcohol company.
Clare Bronfman Pleads Guilty in Nxivm ‘Sex Cult’ Case, Leaving Leader to Stand Trial Alone
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47996207
How is Pizzagate connected to NXIVM?
James Alefantis who owned Comet Ping Pong Pizza, he went by the name Jimmy Comet when posting online.
Here is a very detailed breakdown of Pizzagate, including all of James Alerfantis creepy online posts.
https://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=59526
Here is James Alefantis wiki page, you see they do not mention who his parents are. You can search the web everywhere and you will not find the name of his parents. Kinda weird I would say, what could he be hiding?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Alefantis
Here is a photo of the Rothchild family, you can see a red circle in the picture, that is James Alefantis. James Alefantis grandfather married in to the Rothchild family
https://i.redd.it/25x1nc75t2yz.jpg
In 2018 there was a whistleblower that came out named Ben Szemkus who took a polygraph test that claimed he went to a NXIVM recruitment party and he saw Stormy Daniels, James Alefantis, Anthony Weiner, Huma Abedin and Eric Schneiderman at the party.
https://www.canucknews.ca/post/nxivm-the-new-york-politicians
Ben Szemkus – who claims to have been to a NXIVM recruitment with Stormy Daniels, Wiener, Abedin, Alefantis, Schneiderman – “passes” lie detector test
Eric Schneiderman was a New York AG that resigned after the NXIVM story came out. They said he abused several women.
Not one time does Q type the word "Pizzagate", I assume it is a sensitive subject? He does talk about Allison Mack and gives use many clues about the people associated with NXIVM and it directly ties to Pizziagate using terms like "Watch New York" and "Watch California".
There was a Hunter Biden email that names many New York / California names that Q calls: Pandora's "Political elite" box that I talked about this in a post this morning. It ties NXIVM to the people mentioned in Hunter Biden's email. Here it is if you would like to read it. Hillary Clinton and Kristen Gillibrand were close friends, so many ties, Q told us we have everything, just have to find it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYiKDku/fox-news-article-from-oct-2020-p/
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
EDIT: Here is an extensive article that associates LDR with the Clintons, Jefferey Epstein and many other names. Talks about trips to Epstein Island, its a good one to save.
Thank you.
I must have missed the part about Alefantis as the party! Yes, I see that now.
I read through the linked article about Gillibrand and Clinton's Senate Seat. I didn't see anywhere that Clinton specifically chose her, just that the Governor named her to succeed. I suppose that is how it works, legally. A governor appoints the replacement if a senator retires/resigns? It's logical to assume that Clinton chose her, but is it a fact? Did you find direct references to Clinton choosing her?
Well, that's right. I don't think anyone could look at your research and say "Bah! Humbug! It's all a coincidence!"
It's a really good bunch of digs and connections. There seems there's certainly something going on there, but what exactly?
That said, isn't there a reason for making distinctions between speculation, assumptions, facts, circumstantial evidence and direct evidence?
In a place like a court, for example, these distinctions are really important. For a reason. If you don't distinguish between these, one can easily leap to a wrong conclusion, just as easily as one can leap to a right conclusion. The idea of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is embedded in to the justice system established by our forefathers so that certainty prevails and mistakes aren't made.
E.g., Is there any conclusive evidence that Allison Mack is related to Gellibrand? It is entirely possible that their similarity IS just a coincidence. Or, it might not be. Could they be sisters, for example? We don't know. We can speculate, reasonably, but that is why real evidence is important in separating down fact from fiction, speculation from proven fact, imo.
Speculation is extremely useful for developing theories and hypotheses, but relying on speculation increases the risk of being wrong, right? so, that's where direct and hard evidence come in.
That's what I take away from Q emphasizing "Do due diligence". It's not that we shouldn't speculate, or make assumptions, postulations, etc. But we should recognize their limitations.
Distinguishing between speculation, postulation, assumption, fact, circumstantial and direct evidence is NOT a denial that any of these are relevant. Rather, we simply distinguish between them in order to correctly or appropriately weigh their significance in leading us to reach correct conclusions.
I guess you are being sarcastic here (yes sir?). I don't care what you typed; I'm asking the question in order to understand what you are writing. I'm not attempting to correct you; I'm just asking if "Watch NYC" etc was what you meant when you wrote "Think New York". (Because I spent around 20 minutes going through the q drops to try to find those expressions ("Think NNNN") and if it's clear that you actually mean "Watch NYC", then other anons too, will be able to see what you mean immediately instead of not.)
Hmm I didn’t read it as sarcasm- but as acceptance of a correction. This is a great post and really good dialogue. The best of gaw
Thanks for the comment! if I misread it, I'm glad! Either way, 39 clarified the meaning, which was the real point.
He's picked up some amazing connections here. Really great digs and imaginative connection linking.
Who was governor of NY at the time Hillary gave up her senate seat? Eliot Spitzer, who resigned months later after it was learned he was patronizing prostitution rings. Do you think Hillary would have any input on who would replace her? Its a sexual deviant club and you aint in it. Lol
https://www.detailedpedia.com/wiki-Eliot_Spitzer_prostitution_scandal
I think it's reasonable to assume that Clinton, or her puppet masters, decided who would replace her.