As I understand matters, on Friday (October 7), an injunction preventing Dennis Montgomery from speaking publicly was lifted. This brings Mr. Montgomery back to center stage. His story is unclear, and I thought I’d do what I could for the GAW community to describe his story as I understand it.
Mr. Montgomery is a software developer. He developed Hammer – which is one component of the infamous “Hammer and Scorecard” system, which you no doubt heard so much about.
Hammer is a generic tool for conducting man-in-the-middle (MITM) exploits. It can be pointed at any “secure” online communication session in order to eavesdrop on it. Mr. Montgomery licensed Hammer to the U.S. government, with a fee arrangement that obligated the government to pay him a royalty on a per-use basis.
The government has been using Hammer to eavesdrop on all sorts of communications: to spy on judges, politicians, political campaigns; to conduct insider trading; and so on. Evidently, this goes all the way up to Obama and Hillary.
The government also uses Hammer in connection with elections. If the government wants to alter an election, it uses Hammer together with Scorecard. Hammer intercepts the original data stream from election systems; Scorecard alters it; Hammer reintroduces the altered voting data into the data stream. So Hammer and Scorecard are designed to interoperate in order to alter elections. But Hammer can be used as a stand-alone tool to eavesdrop on secure communication, and that is how it is generally used.
Mr. Montgomery did not trust the government to actually pay him each time they used Hammer. So he designed the system to send all of the information it collected in the course of its use to his private servers – so he’d be able to prove that it was being used. That way he’d be able to enforce his royalty provisions. This means that when the government used Hammer and Scorecard to alter the 2020 election, all of the original voting data ended up on Mr. Montgomery’s private servers. This is the source of Mike Lindell’s PCAP data. It came from Mr. Montgomery’s private servers.
This is congruous with what Dr. Frank told me about the PCAP data more than a year ago. I attended an event that Dr. Frank (and others: Patrick Byrne, Jovan Pulitzer, General Flynn, etc.). was speaking at. At one point in the evening, I left the auditorium to hit the restroom and I saw Dr. Frank in the lobby, so I approached him. He was friendly as could be. Very open. Great man. He’s everything you hear about him and more. Anyhow, I asked him about the PCAPs. He told me that they are real. He further said that Mike Lindell was approached by insiders from three different agencies – including the NSA – and was given software to run. They told him the software would reach out through the Internet and retrieve the original election data. We now know that it reached out to Mr. Montgomery’s private servers to obtain the data.
One further thing. Dr. Frank told me that the real reason they couldn’t reveal the PCAP data was that the packets would reveal the method by which they were intercepted, and that would jeopardize national security. Well, they’d have the IP address of Mr. Montgomery’s private servers, and that would mean Hammer was used. So that’s correct.
Here’s a picture of me and Dr. Frank from the event, BTW: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYrQlIP/
The hilarious part of all of this is that the entire thing is going to collapse on the evildoers because Mr. Montgomery didn’t trust the government not to cheat on royalty payments!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask away.
Or was it? Maybe his software was so good that it exposed the true terrorist - - maybe some who even worked inside the Pentagon. So they try and slander him by saying he’s a con man and his software didn’t exist.
I’d trust outside information before I’d believe anything our government or Wikipedia says.