Not trying to say I know the details, but isn't this similar to Lincoln ending slavery for all states? The southern states felt it was thier right to decide/succeed, and the loss in the Civil War was a loss of state rights? From what I understand the railroad was mainly northern so states with the railroad grew in population which gave the south less representatives in government therefore less representation in the government decisions. To be clear, im not for slavery, and this post is from memory of some video I watched years ago. Seems the federal government has worked hard to erode state rights for centuries. Not letting the south succeed was a blow to state rights and a set back for freedom IMHO.
The Emancipation Proclamation only applied to slavery in the states engaged in the rebellion against the United States. It did not end slavery in states that did not secede. Not surprisingly, the Confederacy ignored it.
After the Confederacy surrendered in April 1865 the Proclamation was enforced. But, at that point the Confederacy was occupied territory and had not regained their statehood, so they had no states rights. The 13th Amendment was ratified later that year and unequivocally made slavery unconstitutional.
Thanks for the education. Thats what I love about gaw. Post an opinion, ask a question and get quality information back rather than snow flakes peeing themselves.
Roe v Wade overturn was about giving power back to the states, and this bill would take that power right back. Nullifying any good that was done and enabling the libs to once again bring back Roe v Wade.
Maybe voting to give money to Ukraine is actually a vote to destroy the Federal Reserve system and create an opportunity to replace it with sound money.
Its not about abortion. Its about NATIONAL. We are sovereign states and that would give the same power back to DC that was and is being stripped. This is a States Rights issue.
This is a state’s rights issue, not federal. We either agree with the SCOTUS decision, and therefore the Constitution, or we don’t.
This bill was always a bullshit attempt by Lindsey Graham to fuck over conservatives in the midterms. Nothing more.
Exactly ^!
Exactly Exactly
If they pass a federal law to ban it, there is no reason there cant be a new federal law tomorrow to guarantee it.
Exactly Exactly Exactly. What they said.
Plain as jam, we'll said.
...because this is a state issue, not a federal issue??
It will end up thrown out of the Supreme Court, again.
It belongs in/with the state legislatures. Remember? That is why he does not believe in a national ban.
Not trying to say I know the details, but isn't this similar to Lincoln ending slavery for all states? The southern states felt it was thier right to decide/succeed, and the loss in the Civil War was a loss of state rights? From what I understand the railroad was mainly northern so states with the railroad grew in population which gave the south less representatives in government therefore less representation in the government decisions. To be clear, im not for slavery, and this post is from memory of some video I watched years ago. Seems the federal government has worked hard to erode state rights for centuries. Not letting the south succeed was a blow to state rights and a set back for freedom IMHO.
The Emancipation Proclamation only applied to slavery in the states engaged in the rebellion against the United States. It did not end slavery in states that did not secede. Not surprisingly, the Confederacy ignored it.
After the Confederacy surrendered in April 1865 the Proclamation was enforced. But, at that point the Confederacy was occupied territory and had not regained their statehood, so they had no states rights. The 13th Amendment was ratified later that year and unequivocally made slavery unconstitutional.
Thanks for the education. Thats what I love about gaw. Post an opinion, ask a question and get quality information back rather than snow flakes peeing themselves.
Your welcome. It’s an era that interests me, mainly because my Great Great Grandfather was a Union Soldier.
The problem that slavery had to begin it. It was unconstitutional to begin with.
No where in the constitution was color mentioned. The deep state changed the definition of what a man / woman means.
Just like they are doing right now.
Roe v Wade overturn was about giving power back to the states, and this bill would take that power right back. Nullifying any good that was done and enabling the libs to once again bring back Roe v Wade.
The mirror goes both ways.
REEEEEEE UNCLE SUGAR MAKE THEM DO WHAT I WANT!
Maybe voting to give money to Ukraine is actually a vote to destroy the Federal Reserve system and create an opportunity to replace it with sound money.
Its not about abortion. Its about NATIONAL. We are sovereign states and that would give the same power back to DC that was and is being stripped. This is a States Rights issue.