Looks like they threw in a few outlier discussion topics in some cases (5G - covid for example) and lumped them into things definitely mentioned in Q drops.
A hallmark of hack coverage about Q is that every article (this USSS writeup included) must conflate Things Q Actually Said with Things Anons Talk About/Discuss/Ponder, Especially in Times When Q Is Silent.
That kind of reductio ad absurdum focus is in every smear piece, taking the most sensational, incredible allegations tossed around by AN anon, and blown up and held as a cohesive set of beliefs shared by millions.
I still cant believe they printed VAxx, 5G and what essentially stands for mind control in the same statement. How very curious, it's almost as they acknowledge it as truth.
That seems to be a common tactic; discuss the absurd as a way to discredit the fairly well documented. It seems to have been used on the Sandy Hook shooting (people like Alex Jones saying there was nobody killed), 9/11 (people saying there were no jets), and many others.
Looks like they threw in a few outlier discussion topics in some cases (5G - covid for example) and lumped them into things definitely mentioned in Q drops.
A hallmark of hack coverage about Q is that every article (this USSS writeup included) must conflate Things Q Actually Said with Things Anons Talk About/Discuss/Ponder, Especially in Times When Q Is Silent.
That kind of reductio ad absurdum focus is in every smear piece, taking the most sensational, incredible allegations tossed around by AN anon, and blown up and held as a cohesive set of beliefs shared by millions.
I still cant believe they printed VAxx, 5G and what essentially stands for mind control in the same statement. How very curious, it's almost as they acknowledge it as truth.
That seems to be a common tactic; discuss the absurd as a way to discredit the fairly well documented. It seems to have been used on the Sandy Hook shooting (people like Alex Jones saying there was nobody killed), 9/11 (people saying there were no jets), and many others.