Ex-Special Forces Physicist Reveals...WiFi/EMF damages human female baby's eggs. ie the mother's future grandchildren at 10x rate of other cells.

posted 2 years ago by USA1st_Guy 2 years ago by USA1st_Guy +33 / -1

https://rumble.com/v1oku6b-ex-special-forces-physicist-reveals-greatest-danger-from-wifi-cell-towers-a.html

4 min. video. an uplifting break from covid covid covid news.

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– USA1st_Guy [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610718301007

" Many studies have demonstrated the effect of EMF at high and low frequencies on human sperm"... "Spermatozoa are highly complex specialized cells designed to survive a long and perilous journey from the site of insemination to the upper reaches of the female reproductive tract where fertilization occurs. The results indicated that such exposure led to formation of ROS that decreased motility along with vitality but increased DNA adducts formation."....

"A fall in reproductive capacity was detected for both types of GSM radiation. "... "These data attest to the harmful impact of mobile phone's radiation on female fertility."

started here but note I had to scroll down a bunch past the mainstream stuff that says everything is fine, no worries, emf away. https://search.brave.com/search?q=non+ionizing+electromagnetic+radiation+damages+human+eggs&source=web

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– FlySciFiGuy 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The first study you cite is funded and organized by the WHO. That alone makes you truly dumb
If you learned anything from the past 2 years it should have been that “scientific studies” are complete hogwash designed to find what the financial backers of the study want to be found. At best studies find correlation, not causation.
Neither study you cite establishes a causative mechanism for how non ionizing radiation damages human cells. So I’ll ask again: HOW does radiation damage you cells if the radiation in question is too weak to alter a single molecule? If it can alter molecules in your body it is by definition ionizing radiation.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– DeathRayDesigner 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You are aware that oxygen can kill you, right? Yet we go on breathing it anyway. Why is that? (Leading question. There is a correct answer. And it pertains to your belief that 5G is deadly.) Clue: hormesis.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q