YO! Haters! So, GAW rolling with the Danchenko trial verdict is "moving the goalposts," is it? Like Danchenko was our big end goal or something? That's your big 'gotcha' for us? That's *retarded*. LOOK INTO MY EYES:
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
What i found most fascinating during the denchenko trial, was that durham went after the fbi more than denchenko. This leads me to believe, like sussman, these trials were solely to get info out to the public and on record…. The verdict doesnt suprise me…
It's plausible, but wouldn't it be more effective if convictions occurred? The same "get[ing] info out to the public and on record" would occur with convictions. Moreover, the convictions would provide more leverage for individuals to come clean in return for leniency.
If it's proven in court that no one lied to the FBI, then the FBI will be accountable for the lying. Durham is eliminating scapegoats.
I haven't really read any evidence of this. It doesn't mean it's not so, and could actually be a possibly, but I think we're left with only speculation at this point.
Your premise would also suggest the FBI, or members thereof, would be contenders for indictment. I hope you are right. Nevertheless, a conviction of Danchenko and Sussman would normally leave them in peril of spending time behind bars, and set the stage for leverage for leniency. This would allow revelations for opening more criminal cases. Yet, we are not dealing with normal judges within the beltway and sentencing could be as little as a slap on the wrists with some probation and a fine.
To be honest, I really don't know where this is heading. And no one else knows, except perhaps for Durham himself. And even with that, Durham's chess game hasn't even taken any of the Deep State's pawns yet. The strategy seems to be recognizable. He is positioning, but will he be able to make his move for a checkmate?
My statement was taken entirely from my (hopeful) Imagination. I should have specified that, but your response is spot on.