"We have everything.
How can we use what we know?
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
What are you witnessing unfold?
Trust the plan.
Q"
uhhh yes...good point...I stick by my thoughts! I recognize your point and it is valid but out of stubbornness, I will assume it was the only sink he was able to get ahold of....
that gave me a good chuckle. Thanks for that. Some theories are so lightweight that I don't have an issue hanging onto it. Call me crazy world, bring it on!
It is, but it's harder to carry a double kitchen sink, I think. If he's making a point, just any sink will do. Every one got the notion "everything, including the kitchen sink".
"...no outside coms..." I always took that to mean Q drops will never come from another source. We were both assuming, as far as I can tell, but there was an issue with a 'fake Q' of some sort when that dropped, as I recall. What Musk is doing there is a proof, (a work of anons), and not "coms".
Of course, some people wouldn't be able to cope with a Musk anon, because they can't get passed some past deed or other. That reminds me of many of the tactics I've seen used to cast shade on President Trump. If I don't buy it when it's done to Trump, I can't reasonably treat Musk that way, either. People change. The change is not always public-facing. Musk changed in some way and that change was evident when it split the leftist wife out of his family. There's evidence to be recognized in his situation.
How about current deeds? Saying Twitter will accelerate his creation of the X "everything app" (oh hello technocratic feudalism, China-style), or how Starlink plays perfectly into the technological control grid desired by our enemies? There are plenty of reasons to be skeptical besides some "past event"
Any set of tools can be abused. This is a freshman business discussion known as "business ethics" or "engineering ethics". Recognizing the risks of a design but pressenting those risks as the purpose of the design is fallacy: assigning motive. Any instrument can be used abusively, but we're not going back to the cave just because someone might get an owwie while we're on the journey.
Thanks for talking down to me by making sure to present business ethics as a "freshman" concept as though I am unfamiliar. If you don't think technology being created that lines up almost too perfectly with globalist goals while providing marginal, if any, benefit (especially looking at X) is not worthy of skepticism I don't really know how we can have a conversation.
Yes, I should keep my integrity and loyalty to Elon because you think he is a white hat.
I should keep my loyalty to Elon, a guy whos business interests are in China. A guy is continuing to expand his manufacturing in China, not America. A guy using Chinese companies to mine his rare earth minerals. His Neuralink chip is still rolling through, and is facing lawsuits from the seizures it caused to monkeys during testing. (Notice this information not being pushed by the media). Neuralink aligns with Klaus Schwabs agenda for micro chips.
X, the everything app is poised to combine Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter into a new super company. (But we're somehow sure that crypto and Neuralink wont be combined? From the same guy who made Paypal?) What was the original name of PayPal? X.com
X is indicative of a hand gesture of a Master Mason. X, the unknown variable. X the symbol on the Pharoah's sarcophagus and part of Skull and Bones fraternity symbol.
"B-b-but, he did the Twitter, and was holding a sink!"
What happened to that Mark of the Beast scare from 2021? Is it not the current thing?
I have to say this. This movie is bizarre AF. I know the plot but damn I am on the edge of my seat with all the twists and turns. I even forget it's a movie sometimes.
The whole future proves past is kinda clever, coming up with a bunch of clues that couldn't possibly be used to predict you actions but that you could use actions you controlled to confirm.........
Can Q be an AI program. This would make ot able to monitor and react instantly to real-time and move and counter move? I'm watching the AI video on YouTube but it all feels fake?
Q might make use of an AI but I don't believe Q is an AI; there are reasons that AIs make obvious (and non-obvious) mistakes when dealing with human issues as opposed to more narrow areas with hard boundaries and rigid rules.
It's definitely come across my mind only because I look at the way Q writes stuff and try to imagine if anyone has a similar way of talking. Of course, I haven't spent a lot of time thinking about this so there are likely a lot of holes that need to be filled.
The dude would likely also have some higher level of clearance due to his work with the government for satellites etc.
We need more, all the coincidences we can get. The more the better, the more we get, the easier it will be to silence the opposition when the storm comes. If we have 1000 coincidences now, that’s great. If we have 5000 at the time of the storm, even the weakest amongst us will be able to stand strong in the midst of the storm, knowing we won and it will all be okay. The more proofs we have the easier it will be to awaken the normies in their time of horror that is to come.
If we had 10,000 proofs maybe by now there would be no normies. We can always use more ammo fren.
Sink or SYNC, as in sync data? I still dont trust Musk. Between starlink, neuralink and now all the more data he will have on NUMEROUS people worldwide... just dont trust him and what his intentions are with all the data he has at his fingertips.
My wife has just pointed out that she feels the bottom of that sink is shaped like a Q, it struck her immediately when I showed her this. It's just subtle enough to alert Anons and allow public deniability at the same time.
It has been opined since the beginning that Q is an AI or used AI in some fashion to look ahead or whatever you want to call it. Elon has mentioned many times how much power and much worse AI can be than a nuke. Could it be that he is either part of this developed AI or now privy to it?
The other side of the coin could also be he is just smart enough to use Q info to buddy up to believers?
Ok Frens...hear me out here..
"Everything but the kitchen sink..."
Well...he has the kitchen sink too!
Which means obviously...
"WE HAVE EVERYTHING!"
Post 1181:
"We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence? What are you witnessing unfold? Trust the plan. Q"
Thats a bathroom sink, ser!
uhhh yes...good point...I stick by my thoughts! I recognize your point and it is valid but out of stubbornness, I will assume it was the only sink he was able to get ahold of....
I admire your tenacity, fren. Have an updoot.
that gave me a good chuckle. Thanks for that. Some theories are so lightweight that I don't have an issue hanging onto it. Call me crazy world, bring it on!
he could have been a cryptic cockney and walked in with a little chinaman under his arm. we would have got it! lol
It is, but it's harder to carry a double kitchen sink, I think. If he's making a point, just any sink will do. Every one got the notion "everything, including the kitchen sink".
Holy crap! Musk is on board!
I was hoping but still had my doubts. Sure happy he’s on our side. Thank God!
Or maybe he was q all along
You poor, poor, people.
Remember when everyone on this board used to scream "no outside comms"?
We could remind each other of that more often.
"...no outside coms..." I always took that to mean Q drops will never come from another source. We were both assuming, as far as I can tell, but there was an issue with a 'fake Q' of some sort when that dropped, as I recall. What Musk is doing there is a proof, (a work of anons), and not "coms".
Of course, some people wouldn't be able to cope with a Musk anon, because they can't get passed some past deed or other. That reminds me of many of the tactics I've seen used to cast shade on President Trump. If I don't buy it when it's done to Trump, I can't reasonably treat Musk that way, either. People change. The change is not always public-facing. Musk changed in some way and that change was evident when it split the leftist wife out of his family. There's evidence to be recognized in his situation.
How about current deeds? Saying Twitter will accelerate his creation of the X "everything app" (oh hello technocratic feudalism, China-style), or how Starlink plays perfectly into the technological control grid desired by our enemies? There are plenty of reasons to be skeptical besides some "past event"
Any set of tools can be abused. This is a freshman business discussion known as "business ethics" or "engineering ethics". Recognizing the risks of a design but pressenting those risks as the purpose of the design is fallacy: assigning motive. Any instrument can be used abusively, but we're not going back to the cave just because someone might get an owwie while we're on the journey.
Thanks for talking down to me by making sure to present business ethics as a "freshman" concept as though I am unfamiliar. If you don't think technology being created that lines up almost too perfectly with globalist goals while providing marginal, if any, benefit (especially looking at X) is not worthy of skepticism I don't really know how we can have a conversation.
Wow, cognitive dissonance much? 😆😆😆
It's called integrity, not "cognitive dissonance". You should try it out someday.
Yes, I should keep my integrity and loyalty to Elon because you think he is a white hat.
I should keep my loyalty to Elon, a guy whos business interests are in China. A guy is continuing to expand his manufacturing in China, not America. A guy using Chinese companies to mine his rare earth minerals. His Neuralink chip is still rolling through, and is facing lawsuits from the seizures it caused to monkeys during testing. (Notice this information not being pushed by the media). Neuralink aligns with Klaus Schwabs agenda for micro chips.
X, the everything app is poised to combine Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter into a new super company. (But we're somehow sure that crypto and Neuralink wont be combined? From the same guy who made Paypal?) What was the original name of PayPal? X.com
X is indicative of a hand gesture of a Master Mason. X, the unknown variable. X the symbol on the Pharoah's sarcophagus and part of Skull and Bones fraternity symbol.
"B-b-but, he did the Twitter, and was holding a sink!"
What happened to that Mark of the Beast scare from 2021? Is it not the current thing?
Are YOU supporting the current thing?
"...because you think he's..."
I didn't say any such thing... and you're assigning motive (fallacy).
If you don't know the person or people behind Q how do you know what's an outside com?
Haha. If you don't know the person or people behind Q how do you know what's an inside com?
I'm not claiming it's inside. I'm saying we don't know.
Strange argument, sir. 🤨
So your saying the sink is Q?
20% public
So you dont think that anyome could read this site, read the q posts and set up comms for us to follow?
Musk is Q? Wait until you find out whos be talking to you! hmmmmm
My money is on Michael Jackson, personally.
You have to love the big grin.
From the look on his face he hasn't had this much fun in a while.
"Sir, you cannot bring that sink in here." "I am your new boss, you fuckwit, and this is high level performance art."
throw the whole kitchen sink at it
But that's a bathroom sink...
oh, well he can throw that at em too lol
Makes sense, since Twatter is a toilet. He's just adding to the decor.
You try carrying around a farmhouse sink lol
I have to say this. This movie is bizarre AF. I know the plot but damn I am on the edge of my seat with all the twists and turns. I even forget it's a movie sometimes.
Now that I'm done laughing I have to comment...
The whole future proves past is kinda clever, coming up with a bunch of clues that couldn't possibly be used to predict you actions but that you could use actions you controlled to confirm.........
i wonder if he is Q and Q+ is trump ;)
That's . . . that's just crazy enough it might be true!
OK, probably not. But fun to contemplate anyway.
https://qalerts.app/?n=918
Can Q be an AI program. This would make ot able to monitor and react instantly to real-time and move and counter move? I'm watching the AI video on YouTube but it all feels fake?
Q might make use of an AI but I don't believe Q is an AI; there are reasons that AIs make obvious (and non-obvious) mistakes when dealing with human issues as opposed to more narrow areas with hard boundaries and rigid rules.
Q is not an AI program. Think Nikola Tesla and time travel. How do you think they can hit dates and the correct time on so many events re: Q drops.
It's definitely come across my mind only because I look at the way Q writes stuff and try to imagine if anyone has a similar way of talking. Of course, I haven't spent a lot of time thinking about this so there are likely a lot of holes that need to be filled.
The dude would likely also have some higher level of clearance due to his work with the government for satellites etc.
Q+ is definitely Trump. Q told us that.
How many more coincidences are required? I think it’s pretty conclusive at this point.
We need more, all the coincidences we can get. The more the better, the more we get, the easier it will be to silence the opposition when the storm comes. If we have 1000 coincidences now, that’s great. If we have 5000 at the time of the storm, even the weakest amongst us will be able to stand strong in the midst of the storm, knowing we won and it will all be okay. The more proofs we have the easier it will be to awaken the normies in their time of horror that is to come. If we had 10,000 proofs maybe by now there would be no normies. We can always use more ammo fren.
Twitter was dirty, Musk gets to work with a good cleaning! Should we all send in some scrubbing bubbles?
u/#q4337
Biden admin also just threatened 70k COVID deaths this winter.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/10/with-covid-boosters-dragging-and-70k-deaths-projected-biden-admin-scrambles/
Draining the swamp
Sink or SYNC, as in sync data? I still dont trust Musk. Between starlink, neuralink and now all the more data he will have on NUMEROUS people worldwide... just dont trust him and what his intentions are with all the data he has at his fingertips.
Thank you so much for clarifying the meaning of this! Appreciate you.
I love this man. Like literally in love.
I live ten mins from Giga Texas too.
My wife has just pointed out that she feels the bottom of that sink is shaped like a Q, it struck her immediately when I showed her this. It's just subtle enough to alert Anons and allow public deniability at the same time.
Look at the smile on his face! Can you imagine… Walking into Twitter, knowing you’re the owner. That’s just awesome.
"Nobody is sleeping tonight" = Nessun Dorma.
Vincero!
Sinks have the capacity to drain volumes of dirty water (swamps).
Sink = sync
621 = 9
621 mirrored is 126 = 10/26
I'm missing your point in adding 621.
Video is 9 seconds long.
126 = 10/26?
It has been opined since the beginning that Q is an AI or used AI in some fashion to look ahead or whatever you want to call it. Elon has mentioned many times how much power and much worse AI can be than a nuke. Could it be that he is either part of this developed AI or now privy to it?
The other side of the coin could also be he is just smart enough to use Q info to buddy up to believers?
Also used in post 4337.
Something was being said about portable sinks, except I'm not a techie and don't know what they are, exactly.