Any set of tools can be abused. This is a freshman business discussion known as "business ethics" or "engineering ethics". Recognizing the risks of a design but pressenting those risks as the purpose of the design is fallacy: assigning motive. Any instrument can be used abusively, but we're not going back to the cave just because someone might get an owwie while we're on the journey.
Thanks for talking down to me by making sure to present business ethics as a "freshman" concept as though I am unfamiliar. If you don't think technology being created that lines up almost too perfectly with globalist goals while providing marginal, if any, benefit (especially looking at X) is not worthy of skepticism I don't really know how we can have a conversation.
Any set of tools can be abused. This is a freshman business discussion known as "business ethics" or "engineering ethics". Recognizing the risks of a design but pressenting those risks as the purpose of the design is fallacy: assigning motive. Any instrument can be used abusively, but we're not going back to the cave just because someone might get an owwie while we're on the journey.
Thanks for talking down to me by making sure to present business ethics as a "freshman" concept as though I am unfamiliar. If you don't think technology being created that lines up almost too perfectly with globalist goals while providing marginal, if any, benefit (especially looking at X) is not worthy of skepticism I don't really know how we can have a conversation.