No, that means they must not have been divorced and remarried or bigamous.
Sorry, but interpretations that have no existence until Calvin hold no weight.
Read early church fathers before constantine sanctioned the Catholic faith.
You are also incorrect about gnostics. There were multiple gnostics. Some believed Christ did not have flesh; some taught that merely adopting in one’s mind the knowledge of Christ was enough. But all were “false gospels“ which we were warned about. The early church was catholic and you cam read about it; current bishops can trace their spiritual lineage through the laying on of hands all the way back to the apostles. St Ignatius of Antioch for instance was ordained by St John the Apostle, for instance.
Your point about paul is made up - sorry, you don’t get to interpret it differently 2000 years later than his own contemporaries did.
No, that means they must not have been divorced and remarried or bigamous.
Sorry, but interpretations that have no existence until Calvin hold no weight.
Read early church fathers before constantine sanctioned the Catholic faith.
You are also incorrect about gnostics. There were multiple gnostics. Some believed Christ did not have flesh; some taught that merely adopting in one’s mind the knowledge of Christ was enough. But all were “false gospels“ which we were warned about. The early church was catholic and you cam read about it; current bishops can trace their spiritual lineage through the laying on of hands all the way back to the apostles. St Ignatius of Antioch for instance was ordained by St John the Apostle, for instance.