So, was the David guy in his underwear or not? Conveniently omitted from this whole discussion.
"Of course Paul Pelosi was in his underwear. It was 2:30 in the morning."
No mention of the " attacker" being in his underwear, or the discussion I read about the "attacker" being in his undewear. Is it an "Of course he was--it was 2:30 in the morning" explanation for him also?
Just shows ya. What "they" omit is often more important than what "they" say.
So, was the David guy in his underwear or not? Conveniently omitted from this whole discussion.
"Of course Paul Pelosi was in his underwear. It was 2:30 in the morning."
No mention of the " attacker" being in his underwear, or the discussion I read about the "attacker" being in his undewear. Is it an "Of course he was--it was 2:30 in the morning" explanation for him also?
Just shows ya. What "they" omit is often more important than what "they" say.