THE MOST IMPORTANT MESSAGE OF ALL TIME? WHAT COULD IT BE?
-
Trump announces his 2024 Presidential run
-
Trump announces his bid for Speaker of the House - 3rd in line for current term presidency
-
Trump announces his merger and expansion of TV Media; Trump TV take over of a failing MSM network
-
Under the LAW of WAR manual,Trump as 'President in Exile' announces and makes public this fact that America is at war with foreign and domestic entities. Announces the 'End of Occupying Territory'
-
As with the Law of War manual outlines, investigations, arrests and indictments will follow; Fast & Swift
-
Military - Devolution plan of Trump's first term
-
Trump announces the irrefutable evidence of 2018, 2020 & 2022 Election fraud/cheating/stealing as captured by US SPACE FORCE
-
Trump's speech tonight will be a quasi; State of the Union Address, for the future direction of our nation for We, the People to take back control of our country
-
Trump will announce a new political party; the AMERICA FIRST or MAGA party.
-
Trump highlights the Mid-Term election results of his endorsed candidates
-
Pence will not be present at Mar-a-Lago (I wonder if DeSantis will be present?)
-
Trump will expose this 'party divide' push by RINOs wanting to keep control of the criminal syndicate (mafia-like) in Wash DC
REMEMBER, THIS TAKING BACK CONTROL DOES NOT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT OR IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE. IT SEEMS A 10+/- YEAR PLAN AND A LENGTHY ENDEAVOR, AS THE CORRUPTION IS DEEP AND WIDE
No worries, though I do share PeePeeHead69's opinions on this subject.
You are correct that there is a dearth of truth in our world, and there are many things that we can't verify for ourselves; to use your example, we can't go see JFK Jr.'s body in person. However, if you (or anyone) are going to assert that official records (and Q) are lying, that he's actually alive, then it is your obligation to provide credible evidence to support your assertion. It is the duty of the proponent of a theory to provide evidence.
Do mainstream news sources lie? Yes, and arguably more often than not. Should we question everything? Yes, indeed we should. But our distrust of news sources and questioning of popularly held opinions must be guided by what evidence is actually available. Simply asserting that current evidence is untrustworthy isn't helpful, unless counter evidence is presented.
Evidence in favor of JFK Jr. being dead:
Evidence against him being dead (based on my discussions with proponents of this theory):
However, you'll observe that the "evidence" in the second category isn't really evidence. The first item is wishful thinking, and the second item, while notable and anomalous, doesn't prove that he's alive. The third item is an assumption.
Your desire to pursue truth and inherent distrust of mainstream news is admirable. However, your attitude that anything you can't put your hands on and verify for yourself is, in my opinion, taking things a little too far. The fact of the matter is that neither you, nor I, nor anyone can verify for ourselves literally everything. None of us have the time or energy for that, and there are many things still classified or otherwise hidden from us. So then we must do the next best thing; take everything and weigh the available evidence for and against it. And yes, sometimes that does require relying on sources that can't be directly verified. But as long as the evidence is followed to its conclusion, and you update your thinking to incorporate new evidence when it surfaces, you won't be led astray.