The word is "lying." The word "groomer" is not aimed at any category of people at all, except for sickos trying to get kids used to being sex objects. Perhaps most of the "groomers" are dirty old men who have been at this since way before LGBTQ ever was a thing.
And I told you his debate "tactic." It's simply lying. His very first sentence is an absolute lie.
He also has a problem with the mathematical concept of sets, as do most liberals. They confuse groups, subgroups, and particular individuals. His last sentence confuses the larger set of all the LGBTQ weirdos with the subset of faggots. I suppose you could call that a form of "false equivalence."
Yep, conditioning the retards not to use ceetain words or phrases because of X, Y or Z. Even if it perfectly describes them you cant say it because it goes against the agenda. Fuck these cunts
lol.. it's like this clown calling an abortion "healthcare".... meanwhile the unborn baby meets a violent doom inside the "mother" where the screams of agony will NEVER be heard.
Funny how these folks never cry about the other libels that are tossed around pretty casually...like "racist". Using the word "racist" is most definitely designed to create hate against certain people and is chosen just as deliberately as the word "groomer".
So I guess what I'm saying is that if I can learn to live with people slandering me because they don't like the way I think, Weiner-boy and the rest of the LGBTBBQ people will just have to get used to being called "groomers". It's only fair.
I saw a stat somewhere that almost all gay men were sexually abused as children. Who do you think abused them? It’s not straight men doing it!
Look, whenever the left thinks there’s a problem with straight white men as a group, they openly discuss it. For example they’ll talk about men perpetuating rape culture (even though that’s mostly black men, but I digress).
Goose, meet gander. The same rules apply. There’s a problem among gay men of sexualy abusing children. Stop trying to sweep it under the rug
Do you have a link to that post rather than the Republican list that the Groomers posted. The list from Q included both but was very heavy with Dem Kidfukkers.
Actually yes he is gay. Dude was also behind several California Bills lowering punishment for exposing people to HIV without their knowledge and various other sexual offenses. And loosening restrictions on the state Sex Offender registry he claimed unfairly targeted Alphabet soup people.
So what he's admitting here is that Groomer is effective at calling out what they're doing. The way they rush to hide being the 'slur' label proves it. They know they're desensitizing children to sexual activities so that people like Weiner can get in the guts of children. Disgusting.
Does Senator Wiener know San Francisco has the word faggot as an option on their application for free money for homeless lgbtqxyz? No? I didn't think so.
For years leftist and their media played down Islamic child rape gangs by calling them grooming gangs. This was to make immigrant Pakistani men who plied white English children with alcohol and drugs, kidnapped them, held them prisoner and passed them around the local Muslim community to be repeatedly raped, sound not so bad so as not to anger the English.
The Left chose the word groomer to refer to men who prey on children. Now it's been flipped onto their protected gay and tranny groups and suddenly they have a problem with it.
U faggots try to groom kids. Trans do it, other deviants do it. You are putrid rotten people for what you do to kids. Otherwise you would be opposing it. Do you oppose it?
Ok Wiener, if you insist. You're a faggot AND a groomer.
Kidfukkers Gonna Kidfuk
Their protective government wall is crumbling. Then it's open season
Pasta lovers
Well, yea...but he is among the chosen...
Does anyone know if there is a specific word or phrase to describe the type of argument Weiner used?
“If you do this, then you are that” - is it framing?
Syllogistic fallacy methinks.
Sounds appropriate, thanks.
The word is "lying." The word "groomer" is not aimed at any category of people at all, except for sickos trying to get kids used to being sex objects. Perhaps most of the "groomers" are dirty old men who have been at this since way before LGBTQ ever was a thing.
Specifically, I am cataloging debate tactics and this format is commonly used. It’s more insidious than lying, if only it were that simple.
And I told you his debate "tactic." It's simply lying. His very first sentence is an absolute lie.
He also has a problem with the mathematical concept of sets, as do most liberals. They confuse groups, subgroups, and particular individuals. His last sentence confuses the larger set of all the LGBTQ weirdos with the subset of faggots. I suppose you could call that a form of "false equivalence."
False equivalence is a good one. See why I was trying to move beyond just calling it lying (which is, well, quite obvious).
I don’t disagree with your observations, btw.
I just didn't see how any of the usual things would apply here.
I do believe it is a type of fallacy.
I had to go back and check. His name is actually Wiener.
I have no problem pissing off Lgbltat&t groomers. Gtf off my porch.
“If you call someone a groomer, you are worse than the people grooming children.”
That’s what I got out of it.
Yep, conditioning the retards not to use ceetain words or phrases because of X, Y or Z. Even if it perfectly describes them you cant say it because it goes against the agenda. Fuck these cunts
These idiots are outing themselves. Gotta love Terry Schilling for his response!
Representative Scott Weiner is a flaming fag and he has promoted pedo sex. I loathe the cocksucker. The DNC has plans to elevate him.
Not just promoting it, but working within the legislature to make it legal and not a crime.
You have to wonder................................ why is he so triggered?
He is always triggered. Has been since he was on the SF Board of Supervisors.
They use the same play book over and over again. Yawn.
The bigger deal they make about "groomer", the more eyes that'll be on it. So keep it up!
Where are the Adults? Are we not suffering huge inflation.
Separate battles, same war.
Yeah Wiener doesn't get to redefine words.
lol.. it's like this clown calling an abortion "healthcare".... meanwhile the unborn baby meets a violent doom inside the "mother" where the screams of agony will NEVER be heard.
Says the guy who wants to fuck minors so he made it legal...
Funny how these folks never cry about the other libels that are tossed around pretty casually...like "racist". Using the word "racist" is most definitely designed to create hate against certain people and is chosen just as deliberately as the word "groomer".
So I guess what I'm saying is that if I can learn to live with people slandering me because they don't like the way I think, Weiner-boy and the rest of the LGBTBBQ people will just have to get used to being called "groomers". It's only fair.
I saw a stat somewhere that almost all gay men were sexually abused as children. Who do you think abused them? It’s not straight men doing it!
Look, whenever the left thinks there’s a problem with straight white men as a group, they openly discuss it. For example they’ll talk about men perpetuating rape culture (even though that’s mostly black men, but I digress).
Goose, meet gander. The same rules apply. There’s a problem among gay men of sexualy abusing children. Stop trying to sweep it under the rug
https://twitter.com/Schilling1776/status/1594507592562352128
I don't have Twitter but wondering why nobody Tweeted the list of Groomers that Q posted.
They did yesterday
Do you have a link to that post rather than the Republican list that the Groomers posted. The list from Q included both but was very heavy with Dem Kidfukkers.
Tough shit, Wiener. Deal with it, just like we have had to deal with all the Leftist crap for years.
Not at all like what we had to deal with. We aren't trying to have them mass executed, yet.
No amnesty
So a child molester is and isn't a part of the alphabet soup? Scott likes Wiener's I'll bet.
Actually yes he is gay. Dude was also behind several California Bills lowering punishment for exposing people to HIV without their knowledge and various other sexual offenses. And loosening restrictions on the state Sex Offender registry he claimed unfairly targeted Alphabet soup people.
People like that are active enough to deserve prison IMHO or ...
You know he is just drooling to take Nancy's seat.
So what he's admitting here is that Groomer is effective at calling out what they're doing. The way they rush to hide being the 'slur' label proves it. They know they're desensitizing children to sexual activities so that people like Weiner can get in the guts of children. Disgusting.
Sodomites aren't born -- they're made.
Lets start with the fact that groomers actually exist.
Then we can discuss whether thats ok or not.
#weinergroomer
Does Senator Wiener know San Francisco has the word faggot as an option on their application for free money for homeless lgbtqxyz? No? I didn't think so.
OK groomer indeed.
Oops wrong post
There are few people worse than SW.
List
https://twitter.com/TPM61964/status/1589433035879251968?s=19
Ok groomer.
Maybe if you left the children out of your sexually deviant behavior, it wouldn't be an issue?
Straight people can be groomers, too. It's just that the alphabet people are doing it right in the public eye and the media promotes it.
List
Challenge accepted, Senator Groomer. Feel violenced yet?
Color me shocked that someone with the last name Weiner is offended by being called a groomer.
Fuck off, stupid groomer faggot.
For years leftist and their media played down Islamic child rape gangs by calling them grooming gangs. This was to make immigrant Pakistani men who plied white English children with alcohol and drugs, kidnapped them, held them prisoner and passed them around the local Muslim community to be repeatedly raped, sound not so bad so as not to anger the English.
The Left chose the word groomer to refer to men who prey on children. Now it's been flipped onto their protected gay and tranny groups and suddenly they have a problem with it.
Aww horseshit.
Gays and trannies are as liable to put groomers in the (edit:)woodchipper as anyone else.
Stop using us as shields for your crimes!
U faggots try to groom kids. Trans do it, other deviants do it. You are putrid rotten people for what you do to kids. Otherwise you would be opposing it. Do you oppose it?
Meanwhile on GAW, we call ourselves faggots... HA!