Okay, I'm not trying to forum slide, but I have something incredibly stupid I have to know.
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
...Did anyone ever ask Q what Covfefe meant before s/he went dark?
...Did anyone ever ask Q what Covfefe meant before s/he went dark?
Others here have covered "covfefe" adequately, so I will address another part of your question, about "before s/he went dark." I think the common belief here is that Q is not a person, but rather a team consisting of fewer than 10 people, some of whom are in military intelligence. Whenever I see Q referred to as an individual in the negative MSM reports, I think the author(s) knows NOTHING about Q.
It first dawned on me that Q was not a single person was about a year into the posts when the tone (or "voice") changed from phrases and talking points, to more fully formed sentences and vocabulary. Then it changed again to a different writing style.
I'm sensitive to such things because for many years I worked as a technical writer and technical editor of scientific documents. I came to believe that whoever was writing those posts were at least 3 different people. Much later came the widespread belief in this community that Q was made up of fewer than 10 persons, some of whom served in military intelligence.
I hope that helps.
It's convenient to speak of Q as an individual. The alternative is what? Every time you say Q include a lesson about how Q is probably a group and maybe even Trump, at times. But Trump is actually thought to be Q+.
Maybe Q's pronouns are "them" and "they"? 8>)