Interesting how the article begins as a discussion about how sloppily Morgan Stanley handled the decommission of client servers, and the loss of sensitive client data, then switches to an attack against Trump and his "theft" of documents from the White House.
Looks to me that the info on Morgan Stanley was just the excuse for the main point of the article.
I noticed that too. "First Donald Trump Purloins Top Secret Documents..." Even the mangy FBI said there was nothing in those documents they seized. Further, since it adds nothing to the article's theme of misfeasance by Morgan Stanley, its placement as the FIRST part of the headline is just TDS in print.
Who runs "Wall Street On Parade" anyway? Some retarded millennial?
Interesting how the article begins as a discussion about how sloppily Morgan Stanley handled the decommission of client servers, and the loss of sensitive client data, then switches to an attack against Trump and his "theft" of documents from the White House.
Looks to me that the info on Morgan Stanley was just the excuse for the main point of the article.
I noticed that too. "First Donald Trump Purloins Top Secret Documents..." Even the mangy FBI said there was nothing in those documents they seized. Further, since it adds nothing to the article's theme of misfeasance by Morgan Stanley, its placement as the FIRST part of the headline is just TDS in print.
Who runs "Wall Street On Parade" anyway? Some retarded millennial?
This is the important part of the article.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2022/34-95832.pdf
READ THE LITIGATION.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2022/34-95832.pdf
Sue them if you can. I want to see people hitting them in their pocketbook to where they are completely collapse. I don't have them.