I have hardly ever heard anything by Nick Fuentes but once a black guy left him a supporting message and he mocked him for being dumb enough to think that Nick would be cool with that. Based on that I suspect he is a plant.
Yeah I don’t trust Fuentes. There is also a clip around 2015/2016 when he was part of Conservative Inc., seemingly being groomed as the next Shapiro, where he was shitting over Trump. Then he has a “falling out” and starts a brand called “America First”? Where he plays an exaggerated version of who the left pretends Trump supporters are? Also he seems extremely gay to me. Owen Benjamin has dug up some clips on Fuentes acting like a fruitcake with his sister - very gay mannerisms, wrist flipping, the lispy voice, hairless, effeminate.
Even when I agree with Fuentes on an issue, the way he presents it, my natural instinct is to want to disagree with him. Not because he offends me, but because his mannerisms and tone seems so anti-masculine. He seems like a weak, whining, petulant boy.
Sometimes that is also a tactic to guide support towards controlled opposition.
I’ve noticed that Crowder, for example, when he starts to get scolded by the right for some stupid thing he said or did, will suddenly be “under attack” by YouTube censors. Then everyone forgets the criticism and rallies around him and buys his mugs. But then he never actually seems to be censored, does he?
Tim Pool is also questionable when he says he was “swatted” by the FBI repeatedly. Apparently that’s not how it actually works, according to people I trust who have been swatted. Once the prank call is exposed and the FBI realized they were tricked into going into a false location guns blazing, they flag that address as a target for prank swatting. Then when another prank call comes in, the flag comes up in their system and instead of setting twenty guys in with body armor and machine guns, they give the address a phone call and ask if everything is okay. They don’t keep kicking in your door week after week after week. This should be common sense.
Also I don’t think controlled opposition has to be fully rejected, especially since we don’t ever know for certain who is who. Instead I think we monitor them for what narratives they push or what subjects they won’t pursue. Crowder, for example, told his team not to mention the pharmaceutical company that makes the puberty blockers for kids, which suggests he wants to drum up clickbait about trans kids, but doesn’t actually want to STOP trans kids. At that point I don’t think it’s possible to fully trust Crowder on this issue and we should ask, “Does this guy want us to run around in circles on this issue but never accomplish anything?” But on gun rights, he might be good, and his content on that might be worth sharing.
It could be, but when his team presented him with the research they did on puberty blockers, he shut it down because it connected back to Israel, and he won’t criticize Israel to such an extent he won’t even allow criticism of a single pharmaceutical company in Israel. Could he have a mental block here? Possibly, but then once he was shown the information, if he truly cared about protecting kids from these chemical pushers, why would he shut it down? He could have criticized that one company and not extended it to all of Israel or all Jewish People. Personally I think Mossad money/Jewish funding explains it better than a mental block. I mean the company is destroying the sexual organs and hormonal functioning of children. This might even be worse than straight out raping them like the Epstein Island crowd did!
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers." – Socrates
So true. Seems to be the ONLY thing leftards can do anymore.
They used to have actual arguments to debate. Mostly dumb arguments with zero facts to back them up, but at least they had SOMETHING.
Not anymore.
I have hardly ever heard anything by Nick Fuentes but once a black guy left him a supporting message and he mocked him for being dumb enough to think that Nick would be cool with that. Based on that I suspect he is a plant.
Yeah I don’t trust Fuentes. There is also a clip around 2015/2016 when he was part of Conservative Inc., seemingly being groomed as the next Shapiro, where he was shitting over Trump. Then he has a “falling out” and starts a brand called “America First”? Where he plays an exaggerated version of who the left pretends Trump supporters are? Also he seems extremely gay to me. Owen Benjamin has dug up some clips on Fuentes acting like a fruitcake with his sister - very gay mannerisms, wrist flipping, the lispy voice, hairless, effeminate.
I had no idea who he was & just searched. Gotta say, he has that egotistical, Shapiro, "I'm think I'm the shit" punchable face🐸
Even when I agree with Fuentes on an issue, the way he presents it, my natural instinct is to want to disagree with him. Not because he offends me, but because his mannerisms and tone seems so anti-masculine. He seems like a weak, whining, petulant boy.
Lol, I feel the same about Shapiro's condescending air👌
I believe you because he’s always been pretty flamboyant and his “fling” with that retard catboykami, but I can’t find that clip.
I don't know much about nick,but he must be a good man,from all the labels the commies put on him.
Sometimes that is also a tactic to guide support towards controlled opposition.
I’ve noticed that Crowder, for example, when he starts to get scolded by the right for some stupid thing he said or did, will suddenly be “under attack” by YouTube censors. Then everyone forgets the criticism and rallies around him and buys his mugs. But then he never actually seems to be censored, does he?
Tim Pool is also questionable when he says he was “swatted” by the FBI repeatedly. Apparently that’s not how it actually works, according to people I trust who have been swatted. Once the prank call is exposed and the FBI realized they were tricked into going into a false location guns blazing, they flag that address as a target for prank swatting. Then when another prank call comes in, the flag comes up in their system and instead of setting twenty guys in with body armor and machine guns, they give the address a phone call and ask if everything is okay. They don’t keep kicking in your door week after week after week. This should be common sense.
You are right,they can be tricky bastards.
I don't follow or watch any of the people you mentioned,so I can't really comment on them.
Also I don’t think controlled opposition has to be fully rejected, especially since we don’t ever know for certain who is who. Instead I think we monitor them for what narratives they push or what subjects they won’t pursue. Crowder, for example, told his team not to mention the pharmaceutical company that makes the puberty blockers for kids, which suggests he wants to drum up clickbait about trans kids, but doesn’t actually want to STOP trans kids. At that point I don’t think it’s possible to fully trust Crowder on this issue and we should ask, “Does this guy want us to run around in circles on this issue but never accomplish anything?” But on gun rights, he might be good, and his content on that might be worth sharing.
Could be he's not fully awake yet,you run into people like that all the time.
It could be, but when his team presented him with the research they did on puberty blockers, he shut it down because it connected back to Israel, and he won’t criticize Israel to such an extent he won’t even allow criticism of a single pharmaceutical company in Israel. Could he have a mental block here? Possibly, but then once he was shown the information, if he truly cared about protecting kids from these chemical pushers, why would he shut it down? He could have criticized that one company and not extended it to all of Israel or all Jewish People. Personally I think Mossad money/Jewish funding explains it better than a mental block. I mean the company is destroying the sexual organs and hormonal functioning of children. This might even be worse than straight out raping them like the Epstein Island crowd did!
Sounds correct to me,they know the power of globalhomo. Should he stay in his lane and red pill people on guns ot talk the truth and be canceled?
I've seen other YouTube struggle with this,mostly they carefully stay in their lane.......
What happened? Character limit didn't allow them to add more adjectives?
Did kymylia write that headline? Cause it needs some croutons...
What the fugg is a nick fuentes?
Wow
Throwing every buzzword they can at him, lmao
Charlottesville racist Kanye West at the airport