Also I don’t think controlled opposition has to be fully rejected, especially since we don’t ever know for certain who is who. Instead I think we monitor them for what narratives they push or what subjects they won’t pursue. Crowder, for example, told his team not to mention the pharmaceutical company that makes the puberty blockers for kids, which suggests he wants to drum up clickbait about trans kids, but doesn’t actually want to STOP trans kids. At that point I don’t think it’s possible to fully trust Crowder on this issue and we should ask, “Does this guy want us to run around in circles on this issue but never accomplish anything?” But on gun rights, he might be good, and his content on that might be worth sharing.
It could be, but when his team presented him with the research they did on puberty blockers, he shut it down because it connected back to Israel, and he won’t criticize Israel to such an extent he won’t even allow criticism of a single pharmaceutical company in Israel. Could he have a mental block here? Possibly, but then once he was shown the information, if he truly cared about protecting kids from these chemical pushers, why would he shut it down? He could have criticized that one company and not extended it to all of Israel or all Jewish People. Personally I think Mossad money/Jewish funding explains it better than a mental block. I mean the company is destroying the sexual organs and hormonal functioning of children. This might even be worse than straight out raping them like the Epstein Island crowd did!
You are right,they can be tricky bastards.
I don't follow or watch any of the people you mentioned,so I can't really comment on them.
Also I don’t think controlled opposition has to be fully rejected, especially since we don’t ever know for certain who is who. Instead I think we monitor them for what narratives they push or what subjects they won’t pursue. Crowder, for example, told his team not to mention the pharmaceutical company that makes the puberty blockers for kids, which suggests he wants to drum up clickbait about trans kids, but doesn’t actually want to STOP trans kids. At that point I don’t think it’s possible to fully trust Crowder on this issue and we should ask, “Does this guy want us to run around in circles on this issue but never accomplish anything?” But on gun rights, he might be good, and his content on that might be worth sharing.
Could be he's not fully awake yet,you run into people like that all the time.
It could be, but when his team presented him with the research they did on puberty blockers, he shut it down because it connected back to Israel, and he won’t criticize Israel to such an extent he won’t even allow criticism of a single pharmaceutical company in Israel. Could he have a mental block here? Possibly, but then once he was shown the information, if he truly cared about protecting kids from these chemical pushers, why would he shut it down? He could have criticized that one company and not extended it to all of Israel or all Jewish People. Personally I think Mossad money/Jewish funding explains it better than a mental block. I mean the company is destroying the sexual organs and hormonal functioning of children. This might even be worse than straight out raping them like the Epstein Island crowd did!
Sounds correct to me,they know the power of globalhomo. Should he stay in his lane and red pill people on guns ot talk the truth and be canceled?
I've seen other YouTube struggle with this,mostly they carefully stay in their lane.......