304
LOL (media.greatawakening.win) 🐸 KEKPOST 🐸
posted ago by StormzAComing ago by StormzAComing +305 / -1
Comments (14)
sorted by:
7
GoingCamaro 7 points ago +8 / -1

The only one's I call "groomer" are the drag queen story hour groomers. No reasonable person is assuming every fudge plunger is a groomer. Reasonable suspicion, however is justified since some homo-couples have in fact been trafficking children.

8
MahaYoshi 8 points ago +8 / -0

Considering the "Gays against groomers" group has been censored and met with the same hostility from these people, they know as well as I do that you aren't slandering all gays, only the groomers.

These people are sick.

4
logos_ftw 4 points ago +4 / -0

People on the left want people in the middle to think that the right is conflating gays and groomers. It makes us look like the bad guys. Heterosexual individuals are just as capable of abusing young people, although I expect that the statistics show that it is not at the same rate. I believe that most people have an instinct to protect children, including gay people. However, certain types of abuse can corrupt that instinct.

If the first person in the screenshot is serious about protecting gay and trans people, then they should be speaking out against drag queen story hour activities. You do not get to endorse PR that associates gay people with child abuse and then complain when people start associating gay people with child abuse.

1
PepeSee 1 point ago +1 / -0

18+ participants on this thing I just posted about definitely count.

https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZEIgVg8v/what-the-fuck-gays-against-groom/

1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

The left constantly seeks to manipulate your ability to think by redefining words

What's funny is, by stating the words pedo and groomer are direct threats against homosexuals and inciting violence, they are directly confirming that homosexuals are pedos and groomers, that there's no daylight between the terms. (I use homosexual instead of the LGB thing...if I'm gonna type out ten letters, they may as well spell a word. :)

1
LongTimeListener 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tyranny loves to paint with the widest brush possible.

5
LordKekingtonEsquire 5 points ago +5 / -0

These people are bots, and if they're not bots, they're NPCs, which is the same thing. They do and say what they're programmed to.

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

I called trannies mentally ill and got banned.

3
Maccachook1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I bet that dumb fark also supported no jab no medical care etc, hypercrite

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the way.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Words are explicitly NOT violence

It's why the Founders included Freedom of Speech in the First Amendment

To prevent violence

When people have the right to speak their minds, they feel no need to assert that right violently...they can just speak

Left wingers think every thought spoken by others that they don't agree with puts their brain in a state of violence—THEY are the violent ones, not the right

(BTW 2A also exists to prevent violence)

I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it

People who grow up with and embrace this sentiment are called 'American Patriots'

1
Cheesecakecrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most are ok with adults making the choices they make when dealing with other adults. The line gets drawn when children become involved. If some tranny absolutist takes a parent's child, behind their back, and gets them hormone treatment or PERMANENT MUTILATING SURGURIES, they DESERVE to be publicly beheaded or hung until dead. There is no child on earth who knows what they are sexually until puberty, and anyone promoting prepubescent children transitioning is a fucking GROOMER. They are confusing the child to prepare them for radical medical interventions and LYING to them to say they are "reversible" if they change their mind. But HEAVEN HELP THE CHILD if they DO change their mind, because they will find that not only are the changes not reversible, the 'community' will turn on them like rabid dogs.

1
KewMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I lived in NYC in the 80's... In the travel industry. It was filled with fags. Fags are groomers.