(By the way...This info was found on another site. I am grateful for the work this anon did for us.)
The jist is that 388 election certifiers did not follow the law, because they did not review the 2020 election within 10 days of Jan 6th. Because there was information available to Congress about foreign interference from China and election fraud, which posed a national security threat, they did not do their duty, and the election could be ruled by the Supreme Court as invalid.
A single individual who filed suit in UTAH against 388 “Federal” officials for rigging the 2020 Election and running the J6 Committee Sham. The underlying case is: RalandJBrunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al., No. 1:21- cv-00111-CMR, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. Judgment entered February 2, 2022. [That is, Brunson lost in the Federal Trial Court. Actually he was dismissed without a hearing] He appealed to the 10th Circuit. The 10th Circuit (Denver Colorado) oversees UTAH appeals. The 10th Circuit Affirmed the dismissal of the Utah Trial Case. See, RalandJBrunson v. Alma S. Adams, No. 22-4007, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Judgment entered October 6, 2022. Brunson then filed a Petition for Certiorari (Cert.)to the United States Supreme Court. Petitions for Cert. are always by Permission. Neil Gorsuch oversee the Cert calendar for the 10th Circuit so he must have accepted it an allowed it to go forward – at least to the making it to Cert. in the S.Ct. stage. It was filed in the S.Ct. on OCT 20 2022 and was assigned Cert. Petition Number 22-0380. (You can search for it on Google. Use your own terms and Google 22-380 or 22-0380 Brunson v Adams). The United States Government was required to file a Response on or about Nov. 23, 2022. But the US Government “waived” its right to a Response. The US Government’s formal response reads: WAIVER The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court. ELIZABETH B. PRELOGAR Solicitor General Counsel of Record. November 23, 2022 //// So, the Petition for Cert. is still “alive”.
This lawsuit did receive a bit of attention, but it was reported that the case was dead. Thankfully, I am not a lawyer - and therefore have no opinion about the legalities of the case.
Basically, it seems like you are saying that the case is not dead, and instead is in fact proceeding to the next phase?
If that is the case, some information about the next phase would be useful.
Some more info about the case at this link:
https://t.me/candlesinthenight/48550
THIS?
Nov 23 2022-Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
It is dead as a door nail. US waived a reply because they aren’t the least bit concerned that SCOTUS is going to take the case. Gorsuch only handles emergency relief requests in the 10th. Anyone who has lost at the circuit level can try to appeal to SCOTUS. Out of about 12,000 petitions a year, they grant about 120 of them.
Thanks so much. I appreciate that link.
Yes, the next phase will lead to the arrests of those 388 who broke the law. But, you know...
Maybe nobody was watching this path. Feels like Frodo sneaking into Mordor.
To which Geek movie do you refer?
it's all geek to me.
The one to rule them all.
Uh-huh, ok then.
Ha. I love that.
THIS??
Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner
Essentially the case asks for the removal of 388 'Respondents' in the House for their refusal to investigate election fraud with evidence presented. This refusal is an act of treason and violates their oath of office. Also for the removal of the 'President' for illegally taking the office
Search for: 22-380
Search Results: file type icon Docket for 22-380
Title: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.
No. 22-380 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2022)
Nov 23 2022-Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
what does this mean? a reply i received
'It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s).'
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
The OP would have us believe otherwise... so... which is it?
Is the case dead, or not?
Some more info about the case at this link:
https://t.me/candlesinthenight/48550
sounds like it is still alive. gonna have to wait and see.
looks dead to me. thx for ur reply
Oh. Good response. But, I hope there is more to it. Thanks so much for your reply
yvw apparently the inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
Oh. I see that could be true. I hope not.
I don't think 2020 will be 'fixed'. It's the new wave that seems to have momentum as 2022 is such blatant fraud, the new elections IF 2020 IS FIXED can restore / correct the corruption.
I say the patriots should stuff the ballot boxes just like the Democrats/commies, and maybe we can win enough state-wide seats to change the voting laws across the country to one vote on one day and all paper ballots. Nothing else to say, except I don't think this case will go anywhere-too many times the heartening news gets pulled out from under us. I am tired of being Charlie Brown with Lucy holding the football.
patriots are already doing that through their sheer numers. This is why it is taking so long to count the votes, because the cheaters are printing and stuffing ballots so that they can win. the trick is to catch them red-handed. They are already desperate, because in AZ they all voted on the day. This threw them through a loop, so they resorted to breaking the system in Repub areas.
I can only pray and hope that you are correct.
Nehemiah... Sounds like prayer is your work, but a sword or spear is exactly that. Neh 4:17
I agree wholeheartedly with the statement.
One reason this might work is because the lame duck Congress is about to attack the Supreme Court by installing term limits and stacking the court. So, the SC may want to fight back, and this lawsuit gives them a tool to do so.
The Brunson's say the SC urged them to hurry and submit the case and even advised them about what needs to be in it.
The dems think they will have the Senate majority next term..enabling them to fill the SC with traitors to our Constitution. GA is already being stolen by Warnick. So, the SC has a big motive to take the Brunson case seriously.
So, to me, the case would be about proving the Congress had the intel, and that there was indeed a national security threat.