This is an excellent interview with Nino, Brunson, Juan, and Ghost!
I urge all Anons to watch this, and contemplate the ideas and theories postulated within. They talk about the Supreme Court case Brunson vs Adams, and what might happen between now and January should the Supreme Court step up to the plate and fulfil their duty and oath of office.
Regardless of what happens between now and then, it is undeniable that we are in a state of Devolution, and that everything we are witnessing Biden and his cohorts do can easily be undone when the curtain falls on this movie.
I, like many other Anons here, still believe that the Patriots are in control of the situation, and that our enemies are right where we want them; in the limelight, soaking up all the blame for everything that is going catastrophically wrong in our country right now. They have completely incriminated themselves, and it is only a matter of time before the hammer of Justice swings swiftly down upon them.
For those who are interested, here is the Supreme Court filing for the Brunson vs Adams case.
"and that everything we are witnessing Biden and his cohorts do can easily be undone when the curtain falls on this movie."
This is not true - unfortunately.
There are now about 1.1 million vaxxine-attributable deaths in the US alone. This salient fact is frequently ignored when discussing and evaluating "the plan" and allowing the "biden administration" to continue its deadly charade, its dance of death and corruption.
I believe we are in the midst of devolution. What I can't figure out is, why the delay?
I get it that Trump can't be put back into the presidency until after January 20th but why are the "dogs of war" still collared and chained?
How does the the vaxxine death toll figure in the plan?
If present trends contine the excess deaths worldwide are going into the billions and the world "on the other side" is going to be a very different place.
We need to include this salient fact in all our considerations of devolution. If we don't do that we're just cherry picking data and ignoring the elephant.
I hear you and I wonder the same. Perhaps it goes back to, people cannot be told -- they have to see it and feel it. The precipice isn't a picnic in the park.
If people still trust Pfizer and Moderna, they aren't ready for the Great Awakening. If they have caught on, they can look up treatments that we have discussed here numerous times, like Ivermectin, the Zelenko protocol, and others. We on this site cannot comprehend how brainwashed the sheep are. It will not be easy to deprogram them.
Sorry, but the remaining folks are literally blind. They cannot see a thing and the only thing that gets through are the short sound bite treats they have been trained to respond to. You want everybody in the camp, got to re-capture the Main Steam Media and start sending out our very own tailored sound bite treats.
This is the reality. Unless we gain control of the propaganda apparatus i.e the MSM, we cannot expect folks to awaken themselves. At least not in the numbers we need to make a difference. Elon buying Twitter seems nice and all, but it's just a drop in the bucket when compared to the global MSM networks. Does that mean we should give up? Of course not, but at the current rate we will all be dead before the masses awaken, if they awaken at all. Maybe when we reach a precipice, this will all change. However, I like many others believe we have yet to reach such a point.
So where's the hope? My hope is in the only person who can save me or anyone else, and that's Jesus Christ. I thank him everyday for awakening and saving me. He is the only way.
Some people aren't interested in the "news". All they need to be happy is their bread and circuses - as long as their lifestyle isn't disturbed, they won't care. They'll tell you straight to your face that they just don't care.
It's even worse than that, if you can imagine...
A previously close to my heart friend was proud to get shot up, and I'm thinking she was one of the fortunates who got saline instead, because she's healthy. We're still friends because we have been for many long years, and there's plenty to talk about without going to politics, et al.
What's different about her is that she was open to join my blog site, but quit after watching a Joe M video that showed tanks. She asked me for the VAERS site link but said nothing about it after. She watched at least 15 minutes of the "Who owns the world" video about Blackrock and Vanguard, and her response after that much was about her belief that as a shareholder, she has a say. We never spoke of it again.
Here's the frustrating part (as though this isn't enough)...she's an artist, and a professional one at that. She's confessed that if she did know what I know, it would kill her ability to do what she came here to do.
There's nothing to fight against there...nothing for me to do to wake her up.
God gave us all free will and there are always casualties in war. Make no mistake we are in the midst of war and all we can do is try to educate to minimize the casualties but ultimately each person has to make their choice between living in fear or walking in faith.
Vax death toll ...war. for you to think death in war invalidates the plan is idiotic.
Happy endings are fantasy when it comes to war. Survival till the end of conflict is the goal.
Focus on the what isn't changing and that's what you'll see.
I expected 10 times worse casualties than we have suffered amd yet here we are sleeping comfortably in our beds in the midst of rhe worst war in our history.
I'll take the win we are getting if we can't have the ideal Hollywood last minute miracle where every one ends up just dandy.
It's all about the dollars. They, white hats, are tracking the usa money being paid out to Ukraine and other black holes. In other words, they are still following the money trail to determine who to round up and exterminate. That is my conclusion, and yes devolution is in play.
Even if people don't like Juan (I know there are some and that's fine), just listen to Brunson's summary of the case and what's been happening with it. It's the first 9-10 minutes.
It would look a lot better on the military if they were only enforcing the judicial branch's decision rather than conducting what would appear to many to be a coup against the entire government.
I believe under Devolution and the Continuity of Government, it would have to be the senior cabinet member of President Trump's administration prior to the initiation of Devolution. It all depends upon who incriminated themselves during the illegal transfer of power back in 2020.
There may be a short time where we have no President, and are in a temporary state of Martial Law while the Military oversees a new election for the entire government in order to return us to a Constitutional Republic.
One interview yesterday said Trump would have to step in since he did not hand off the presidency via concession. It would only be in the interim until a new election is held.
This is the type of suit, if it is found to be true by the court, is the type of punishment most of us speak about here in saying these people need to be punished, It shouldn't end with their removal from office, it should go toward the treason charge and end up with the full punishment of the law behind any guilty finding.
Caravan to Midnight, John B. Well's show had a great interview with him for episode 1923. You may have to sub to hear the whole thing, but his shows are amazing.
David Nino Rodriguez with Ghost, Juan O Savin and one of the Brunson brothers whose case is now with the Supreme Court. Talk about the possibility of all the member who did not protect the people by taking the 10 days senator Cruz asked for on jan 6 to consider certification of the vote due to possible foreign interference.
The nature of the Brunson legal action is that representatives certified election results without conducting an investigation into the evidence of election fraud which was presented by US intelligence agencies (President Trump's E.O).
The 388 members of the government failed to do so prior to their certification of the fraudulent vote on Jan. 6th - which means they committed some very serious crimes in the process and at the very minimum can no longer hold any elected office in the US.
The SC could have taken many actions to kill this case, but instead have taken steps to facilitate its progress through the proceedings... and it is now going to be up for review. It has already gone much too far through the process to be easily ignored or legally brushed aside at this point. Everything indicates that it is likely to be heard by the SC.
The SC has some good incentives to move on this rapidly (during December) prior to the next session of congress in January... and here we are...
Interesting point by Juan about this giving the Supreme Court a weapon to fight back against Congress/Executive action against them in the lame duck session regarding imposing term limits or packing the court.
Add it to the long list of failed PAYtriot narratives & predictions.
Sigh.... How many times do anons have to be duped by these type of grifters before they start to see the truth of what they are: Snake-oil salesmen shrouded in half truths claiming "secret insider knowledge". NO OUTSIDE COMMS. Careful who you follow.
The corporate "Federal" "The United States of America" and its corporate "Supreme Court" operate under military "Special Admiralty" jurisdiction of the sea. Very different from the "American" "the United States of America" operating within the "Law of the Land" (Common Law).
In the former, only LEGAL (dead/fictional) entities have "Standing" - Citizens, presidents, residents, persons, senators, etc. In the latter, only LAWFUL entities have "Standing" - e.g. men or women.
Thus, a "Man" cannot sue a "President" anymore then a "President" can sue a "Man". You're mixing the living (LAWFUL) and the dead (LEGAL) here.
If Brunson is none the wiser, which is likely the case, nobody is going to educate him in any position of power. And as such, they can LEGALLY declare the "Man" (Brunson) has no "Standing" in their special admiralty jurisdiction law-fare.
Maxim of Law: Ignorance of the law is no defense.
Rule of fair play: It's nobody's job to educate the ignorant (99% of the population).
If Brunson is using an attorney, he's already submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM where there are a thousand ways to dismiss the case, as it is designed to be this way. If he filed "Pro Se" he has also submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM as well.
Only filing a case "Sui Juris", as a man, against other men and women could produce the results he's ultimately looking for. Further, the supreme court justices would also have to change their hats and act as "Referees" rather than "Judges". Not sure how this would or could work without a jury of one's peers in the mix.
The Supreme Court already chose to bring it to conference where it needs 4 votes to proceed. They could have just ignored it, but the Court's Clerk wanted their filings as soon as possible.
All WoC are brought to conference. 100%. Thats where 98.7% of them go to die. The court gets about 7000 filings a year. They all go to conference. The Justices clerks review them first, write a short summary for their bosses, then they (the actual Justices) then decide. They burn through 100s a day during ‘conference’. In the end, They actually hear up to about150. This bullshit is dead on arrival
I realize that and I don’t disagree but the Court’s Clerk was going to accept their Rule 11 petition based on a national emergency bypassing the 10th Circuit Court before they ruled right before they filed. They then accepted their petition without the Rule 11 stuff. I would think if it was DOA they would never have accepted the Rule 11 petition (or we’re going to).
So why push Brunson to get it early though? Let's assume you are correct. The petition was properly filed, so they knew they had to process it and send it to the dumpster. Then why ask to get it early if that was their motivation? They could throw it out next week or next month just as easily as today.
There was a reason they wanted this case now. That implies it may not be headed straight for the dumpster. It could be as they say in the video, simply a defensive weapon against the Biden administration if they try and follow through on packing the court. Or it could be something more. But the events leading up to this indicate it is more than just an annoyance to them that they are planning on quashing.
We'll see I suppose. But the data on this one points to something with significance.
All I will say is, I truly hope you are correct and I hope I have to come in here and post how wrong I was. That is a fact. It would be incredible if somehow this passed in conference and was promoted to the docket. That being said … Im 99% certain this has all been weapons grade Hopium. A lot of people posted a lot of videos about this on the internet and didn't really think it through, or were intentionally preying on those of us praying for some kind of miracle to save our Republic.
I could be wrong, but my two cents....After the '20 election when there was a lot of hope that the SC would fix the fraud I thought they probably wouldn't, because it was too early.
To this day my thinking is that the election fraud was allowed to succeed (and that means SC didn't interfere) so DJT could be out of the picture while the Dems ran wild destroying the country right out in the open with everyone watching. If the SC or military would have interfered after the election the country would have been torn, and civil war could actually have been a real possibility. I believe intervention by the SC or military will not happen until we've hit the precipice and people are united and ready to demand change.
This is the correct response. Nothing will come of this case, the USSC is not about to toss every elected official. Just the fact that people believe this will happen is shocking and disheartening. This is why we aren't winning anything.
Yep, if the Executive and Legislative branches start attacking them in the lame duck session, the Supreme Court can interpret this case however they want to deem them all illegitimate.
I don't have much faith that the SCOTUS would vote in favor of having a hearing for this case, let alone voting in FAVOR of it. I mean, this is the same SCOTUS that voted 7-2 in 2020 to not hear that case filed by the State of Texas, PLUS now they have Ketanji Brown Jackson to vote against it. I wouldn't be surprised to see a 9-0 against a hearing, MAYBE an 8-1.
How long does the SCOTUS have to vote on a hearing?
Search Results:
file type icon Docket for 22-380
Title: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.
No. 22-380 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari FILED
(Response due November 23, 2022)
It means the government waived their right too offer a response to this filing. Nothing more. They didnt want to waste time with it.
This is being so blown out of proportion its embarrassing. I almost think this is a trojan horse to make us look stupid. Everything in the filing is 100% spot on. However, the USSC does play hot potato with political grenades. They dont. The idea that any law enforcement agency will arrest anyone on that defendant list is delusional. I want it more than most. It aint happening.
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s).
~~
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
That was on the side of the defendants. The 385 or so congresspeople plus Pence, whose attorney inexplicably did not follow through with his / her right to respond.
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s).
~~
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
In the end the military will have to show gaming models based on accrued deaths, if things were more kinetic. If naught, it will seem suspect to the population. But if they show how everything was based against humanity, in a colorful way, if may be accepted.
Nah, if they know and they do nothing then they include themselves in the guilt of the case. I dont think they have much of a choice, it needs to proceed.
Even "if" the supreme court could remove the sitting president, VP, members of congress and senate, it would not mean that Trump would magically become president again. If something this insane were to happen then it would be more likely that military would temporary take control of government to hold special elections.
Even if they could remove everyone and put Trump back as president then that would cause mass riots and far more trouble than we've seen in recent years. Even if everyone knew Trump would return to being president, it would have to be done with the public image of elections for people to accept it. Even with actual elections, those lunatics refused to accept it for 4 years so one can only imagine how crazy they'd be without an election.
Everyone needs to not continually get their hopes up that something big will happen all at once anytime soon. The most likely things to happen will be that Trump wins in 2024 by such huge numbers that no amount of fraud can overcome it and it might be to such a degree that even liberals will notice and realize that 2020 was not legitimate.
He could still be president but to appease a reasonable portion of the country would require elections even if it were for show. Even if the military came in and provided actual proof with video evidence, they'd still need to put on a show for an election or likely deal with months of mass riots.
Well, I'll take this over LARPers and gold/crapto Scholls reading us random message board posts as news or coming up with their own fever pitch pipe dreams. Unfortunately, I have to also weigh in the naysayers here and I'm not going to get my hopes up. Still, it's more than the usual Muller special nothing burger.
Let’s see something happen.. otherwise I’m tired of getting my hopes up over the last 10 things this board hyped up while callings doubters doomers and shills. Not to say I don’t think the good guys aren’t doing great things..
Very much appreciate the link and I read it. Thanks! My point was that those who would have to adjudicate and enforce this (arrests) are all compromised. So although it technically should and could happen, we have gone too far for it to be carried out. I have been hoping for something like this to happen since Biden got inaugurated illegitimately. Yet here we are. I try to have hope but it has been a long time.
I would say that less than half the Justices of the SCOTUS are compromised and the arrests would be made by federal marshals or by the Marines or other military. There is no evidence that those people are compromised.
Those same marshals that locked up Gregg Phillips and Catherine with literally no charges, taking away their clothing and bedding...those marshals? Very heroic they are.
Yes U.S. Marshals Service under the DOJ, however they are Federal Court Officers first and perform any duties ordered by the Federal Court. By tradition they also have individual State arrest authority.
Excellent round table discussion. One thing that was stated, is how various DC players have given themselves immunity, and this is the frightening part. Let’s hope that there are ways to penetrate this field of immunity.
So I was looking into some stuff about Freemasons and noticed their verbiage for their courts and hierarchies are word for word copypasted as our government terminology. They couldnt even create new words just blatently copied the same shit. I dont trust the civilian courts to save us here. Military is the only way.
This is an excellent interview with Nino, Brunson, Juan, and Ghost!
I urge all Anons to watch this, and contemplate the ideas and theories postulated within. They talk about the Supreme Court case Brunson vs Adams, and what might happen between now and January should the Supreme Court step up to the plate and fulfil their duty and oath of office.
Regardless of what happens between now and then, it is undeniable that we are in a state of Devolution, and that everything we are witnessing Biden and his cohorts do can easily be undone when the curtain falls on this movie.
I, like many other Anons here, still believe that the Patriots are in control of the situation, and that our enemies are right where we want them; in the limelight, soaking up all the blame for everything that is going catastrophically wrong in our country right now. They have completely incriminated themselves, and it is only a matter of time before the hammer of Justice swings swiftly down upon them.
For those who are interested, here is the Supreme Court filing for the Brunson vs Adams case.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
"and that everything we are witnessing Biden and his cohorts do can easily be undone when the curtain falls on this movie."
This is not true - unfortunately.
There are now about 1.1 million vaxxine-attributable deaths in the US alone. This salient fact is frequently ignored when discussing and evaluating "the plan" and allowing the "biden administration" to continue its deadly charade, its dance of death and corruption.
I believe we are in the midst of devolution. What I can't figure out is, why the delay?
I get it that Trump can't be put back into the presidency until after January 20th but why are the "dogs of war" still collared and chained?
How does the the vaxxine death toll figure in the plan?
If present trends contine the excess deaths worldwide are going into the billions and the world "on the other side" is going to be a very different place.
We need to include this salient fact in all our considerations of devolution. If we don't do that we're just cherry picking data and ignoring the elephant.
I hear you and I wonder the same. Perhaps it goes back to, people cannot be told -- they have to see it and feel it. The precipice isn't a picnic in the park.
If people still trust Pfizer and Moderna, they aren't ready for the Great Awakening. If they have caught on, they can look up treatments that we have discussed here numerous times, like Ivermectin, the Zelenko protocol, and others. We on this site cannot comprehend how brainwashed the sheep are. It will not be easy to deprogram them.
Sorry, but the remaining folks are literally blind. They cannot see a thing and the only thing that gets through are the short sound bite treats they have been trained to respond to. You want everybody in the camp, got to re-capture the Main Steam Media and start sending out our very own tailored sound bite treats.
This is the reality. Unless we gain control of the propaganda apparatus i.e the MSM, we cannot expect folks to awaken themselves. At least not in the numbers we need to make a difference. Elon buying Twitter seems nice and all, but it's just a drop in the bucket when compared to the global MSM networks. Does that mean we should give up? Of course not, but at the current rate we will all be dead before the masses awaken, if they awaken at all. Maybe when we reach a precipice, this will all change. However, I like many others believe we have yet to reach such a point.
So where's the hope? My hope is in the only person who can save me or anyone else, and that's Jesus Christ. I thank him everyday for awakening and saving me. He is the only way.
Yup, the globalists are actually winning their highest goal.
They WILL achieve global population reduction because they have ALREADY injected a serious enough percentage of the population to achieve their goal.
The battle is actually already over because the vaccine rolled out.
We have to accept that.
The war isn't done, but the battle against global depopulation had been lost.
As far as their control network goes. That's where the war is. That's what we can still win.
But it won't work as long as the MSM functions as cabal propaganda.
No they won't lol
They won't what?
Some people aren't interested in the "news". All they need to be happy is their bread and circuses - as long as their lifestyle isn't disturbed, they won't care. They'll tell you straight to your face that they just don't care.
It's even worse than that, if you can imagine... A previously close to my heart friend was proud to get shot up, and I'm thinking she was one of the fortunates who got saline instead, because she's healthy. We're still friends because we have been for many long years, and there's plenty to talk about without going to politics, et al.
What's different about her is that she was open to join my blog site, but quit after watching a Joe M video that showed tanks. She asked me for the VAERS site link but said nothing about it after. She watched at least 15 minutes of the "Who owns the world" video about Blackrock and Vanguard, and her response after that much was about her belief that as a shareholder, she has a say. We never spoke of it again. Here's the frustrating part (as though this isn't enough)...she's an artist, and a professional one at that. She's confessed that if she did know what I know, it would kill her ability to do what she came here to do. There's nothing to fight against there...nothing for me to do to wake her up.
God gave us all free will and there are always casualties in war. Make no mistake we are in the midst of war and all we can do is try to educate to minimize the casualties but ultimately each person has to make their choice between living in fear or walking in faith.
I think you mean Zelenko protocol? 🤔
Correct.
The Zelenski protocol is the one where you get 90 billion dollars from your colleagues and you launder it after taking a slice off the top.
Kek 🤣
Oh, man! Absolutely right. Yikes.
Vax death toll ...war. for you to think death in war invalidates the plan is idiotic.
Happy endings are fantasy when it comes to war. Survival till the end of conflict is the goal.
Focus on the what isn't changing and that's what you'll see.
I expected 10 times worse casualties than we have suffered amd yet here we are sleeping comfortably in our beds in the midst of rhe worst war in our history.
I'll take the win we are getting if we can't have the ideal Hollywood last minute miracle where every one ends up just dandy.
Those who have died are in effect soldiers in this war.
Let us not forget that if their plan had gone along as they wished a whole lot more would die.
I truly believe that
It's all about the dollars. They, white hats, are tracking the usa money being paid out to Ukraine and other black holes. In other words, they are still following the money trail to determine who to round up and exterminate. That is my conclusion, and yes devolution is in play.
It could be possible that as bad as it is this was the best option. This is war after all.
Even if people don't like Juan (I know there are some and that's fine), just listen to Brunson's summary of the case and what's been happening with it. It's the first 9-10 minutes.
It would look a lot better on the military if they were only enforcing the judicial branch's decision rather than conducting what would appear to many to be a coup against the entire government.
Looking at the line of succession who would end up being president temporarily, if those names in the civil suit are removed from their offices?
That is indeed the million dollar question.
I believe under Devolution and the Continuity of Government, it would have to be the senior cabinet member of President Trump's administration prior to the initiation of Devolution. It all depends upon who incriminated themselves during the illegal transfer of power back in 2020.
There may be a short time where we have no President, and are in a temporary state of Martial Law while the Military oversees a new election for the entire government in order to return us to a Constitutional Republic.
That reminds me of Lindell outside at the WH with a stack of “martial law” documents waiting to see President Trump.
One interview yesterday said Trump would have to step in since he did not hand off the presidency via concession. It would only be in the interim until a new election is held.
This sounds glorious!
Thank you for the link to the filing, should be interesting.
The Konnech Chinese connection will be huge in this case.
This is the type of suit, if it is found to be true by the court, is the type of punishment most of us speak about here in saying these people need to be punished, It shouldn't end with their removal from office, it should go toward the treason charge and end up with the full punishment of the law behind any guilty finding.
Caravan to Midnight, John B. Well's show had a great interview with him for episode 1923. You may have to sub to hear the whole thing, but his shows are amazing.
David Nino Rodriguez with Ghost, Juan O Savin and one of the Brunson brothers whose case is now with the Supreme Court. Talk about the possibility of all the member who did not protect the people by taking the 10 days senator Cruz asked for on jan 6 to consider certification of the vote due to possible foreign interference.
The nature of the Brunson legal action is that representatives certified election results without conducting an investigation into the evidence of election fraud which was presented by US intelligence agencies (President Trump's E.O).
The 388 members of the government failed to do so prior to their certification of the fraudulent vote on Jan. 6th - which means they committed some very serious crimes in the process and at the very minimum can no longer hold any elected office in the US.
The SC could have taken many actions to kill this case, but instead have taken steps to facilitate its progress through the proceedings... and it is now going to be up for review. It has already gone much too far through the process to be easily ignored or legally brushed aside at this point. Everything indicates that it is likely to be heard by the SC.
The SC has some good incentives to move on this rapidly (during December) prior to the next session of congress in January... and here we are...
This is kind of a big deal, no?
Can you point me to the 10 day requirement? I've searched the Constitution and can't find it directly.
That is my bad - I was looking at a combination of the 12th amendment, the Electoral Count rule of 1887, and more recent E.O's by President Trump.
You are correct, the 10 days for the review period was from Cruz. My bad on that.
Interesting point by Juan about this giving the Supreme Court a weapon to fight back against Congress/Executive action against them in the lame duck session regarding imposing term limits or packing the court.
Supreme Court is not "removing the president and VP" and installing Trump
Massive disappointment awaits any patriot subscribing to that fantasy
Thank you
I canceled out whoever felt the need to downvote the comment "Thank you"
;)
Another thank you is in order for you 😊
And here's one for you :)
Add it to the long list of failed PAYtriot narratives & predictions.
Sigh.... How many times do anons have to be duped by these type of grifters before they start to see the truth of what they are: Snake-oil salesmen shrouded in half truths claiming "secret insider knowledge". NO OUTSIDE COMMS. Careful who you follow.
Let me predict the Supreme Court response: NO Standing. Seems to be their response to any case they don't want to hear.
If the president has no standing, and voters have no standing, who on earth has standing?
The corporate "Federal" "The United States of America" and its corporate "Supreme Court" operate under military "Special Admiralty" jurisdiction of the sea. Very different from the "American" "the United States of America" operating within the "Law of the Land" (Common Law).
In the former, only LEGAL (dead/fictional) entities have "Standing" - Citizens, presidents, residents, persons, senators, etc. In the latter, only LAWFUL entities have "Standing" - e.g. men or women.
Thus, a "Man" cannot sue a "President" anymore then a "President" can sue a "Man". You're mixing the living (LAWFUL) and the dead (LEGAL) here.
If Brunson is none the wiser, which is likely the case, nobody is going to educate him in any position of power. And as such, they can LEGALLY declare the "Man" (Brunson) has no "Standing" in their special admiralty jurisdiction law-fare.
Maxim of Law: Ignorance of the law is no defense.
Rule of fair play: It's nobody's job to educate the ignorant (99% of the population).
If Brunson is using an attorney, he's already submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM where there are a thousand ways to dismiss the case, as it is designed to be this way. If he filed "Pro Se" he has also submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM as well.
Only filing a case "Sui Juris", as a man, against other men and women could produce the results he's ultimately looking for. Further, the supreme court justices would also have to change their hats and act as "Referees" rather than "Judges". Not sure how this would or could work without a jury of one's peers in the mix.
The Supreme Court already chose to bring it to conference where it needs 4 votes to proceed. They could have just ignored it, but the Court's Clerk wanted their filings as soon as possible.
All WoC are brought to conference. 100%. Thats where 98.7% of them go to die. The court gets about 7000 filings a year. They all go to conference. The Justices clerks review them first, write a short summary for their bosses, then they (the actual Justices) then decide. They burn through 100s a day during ‘conference’. In the end, They actually hear up to about150. This bullshit is dead on arrival
I realize that and I don’t disagree but the Court’s Clerk was going to accept their Rule 11 petition based on a national emergency bypassing the 10th Circuit Court before they ruled right before they filed. They then accepted their petition without the Rule 11 stuff. I would think if it was DOA they would never have accepted the Rule 11 petition (or we’re going to).
Correct. What I meant by DOA is when the justices clerks do their collective thing. They will in all likelihood send it to the trash heap.
Yep.
So why push Brunson to get it early though? Let's assume you are correct. The petition was properly filed, so they knew they had to process it and send it to the dumpster. Then why ask to get it early if that was their motivation? They could throw it out next week or next month just as easily as today.
There was a reason they wanted this case now. That implies it may not be headed straight for the dumpster. It could be as they say in the video, simply a defensive weapon against the Biden administration if they try and follow through on packing the court. Or it could be something more. But the events leading up to this indicate it is more than just an annoyance to them that they are planning on quashing.
We'll see I suppose. But the data on this one points to something with significance.
All I will say is, I truly hope you are correct and I hope I have to come in here and post how wrong I was. That is a fact. It would be incredible if somehow this passed in conference and was promoted to the docket. That being said … Im 99% certain this has all been weapons grade Hopium. A lot of people posted a lot of videos about this on the internet and didn't really think it through, or were intentionally preying on those of us praying for some kind of miracle to save our Republic.
I could be wrong, but my two cents....After the '20 election when there was a lot of hope that the SC would fix the fraud I thought they probably wouldn't, because it was too early.
To this day my thinking is that the election fraud was allowed to succeed (and that means SC didn't interfere) so DJT could be out of the picture while the Dems ran wild destroying the country right out in the open with everyone watching. If the SC or military would have interfered after the election the country would have been torn, and civil war could actually have been a real possibility. I believe intervention by the SC or military will not happen until we've hit the precipice and people are united and ready to demand change.
I think you are right. And I think we are still a long ways off from when "we've hit the precipice and people are united".
And everyone said, “military is the only way..”
This is the correct response. Nothing will come of this case, the USSC is not about to toss every elected official. Just the fact that people believe this will happen is shocking and disheartening. This is why we aren't winning anything.
Could this case be the ultimate Trump card?
It could be if the Judicial Branch of the United States Government decides to act proactively in defense of their Constitutional Authority.
Yep, if the Executive and Legislative branches start attacking them in the lame duck session, the Supreme Court can interpret this case however they want to deem them all illegitimate.
Silver Bullet!
u/#Durham
We can only hope but it sounds like there are possibly multiple Trump cards.
I agree. The talk about this case just made me think of it as a Trump card for the Supreme Court.
Super Major Red Pill. Knowledge is Power.
u/#q4966
I don't have much faith that the SCOTUS would vote in favor of having a hearing for this case, let alone voting in FAVOR of it. I mean, this is the same SCOTUS that voted 7-2 in 2020 to not hear that case filed by the State of Texas, PLUS now they have Ketanji Brown Jackson to vote against it. I wouldn't be surprised to see a 9-0 against a hearing, MAYBE an 8-1.
How long does the SCOTUS have to vote on a hearing?
True, or hope until the hopium is gone. Sometimes i just want a little pick me up.
I will pass out some hopium and even more if this passes the conference.
Damn this is huge. Merry Christmas America? Time will tell.
Sounds like it could be, I'm praying it is.
Search Results: file type icon Docket for 22-380 Title: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al. No. 22-380 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari FILED (Response due November 23, 2022)
Nov 23 2022-Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted. https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx?Search=22-380
What does this mean?
It means the government waived their right too offer a response to this filing. Nothing more. They didnt want to waste time with it.
This is being so blown out of proportion its embarrassing. I almost think this is a trojan horse to make us look stupid. Everything in the filing is 100% spot on. However, the USSC does play hot potato with political grenades. They dont. The idea that any law enforcement agency will arrest anyone on that defendant list is delusional. I want it more than most. It aint happening.
It means that we the people have no justice or recourse in law when our elections are obviously stolen in the current system.
Extremely well said fren. You nailed it.
what does this mean? a replies i received:
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s). ~~ Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
My understanding is that the SC accepted the case.
do u know what this means? "Waiver of United States of right to respond? filed by court 11/23 -- https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx?Search=22-380
That was on the side of the defendants. The 385 or so congresspeople plus Pence, whose attorney inexplicably did not follow through with his / her right to respond.
got it thx
what does this mean? a replies i received:
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s). ~~
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
Why would a court enforce an oath of office now when they've never done that before?
In the end the military will have to show gaming models based on accrued deaths, if things were more kinetic. If naught, it will seem suspect to the population. But if they show how everything was based against humanity, in a colorful way, if may be accepted.
Trump said very early on, "We have them all". This seems to be the high watermark and "they" are about to get the storm dumped right on their heads.
Juan thinks it's a tool that the Supreme Court will use to hold over congress if they try to pass term limits or pack the court. Could go either way.
Nah, if they know and they do nothing then they include themselves in the guilt of the case. I dont think they have much of a choice, it needs to proceed.
This is awesome information... thank God for these brothers!
Even "if" the supreme court could remove the sitting president, VP, members of congress and senate, it would not mean that Trump would magically become president again. If something this insane were to happen then it would be more likely that military would temporary take control of government to hold special elections.
Even if they could remove everyone and put Trump back as president then that would cause mass riots and far more trouble than we've seen in recent years. Even if everyone knew Trump would return to being president, it would have to be done with the public image of elections for people to accept it. Even with actual elections, those lunatics refused to accept it for 4 years so one can only imagine how crazy they'd be without an election.
Everyone needs to not continually get their hopes up that something big will happen all at once anytime soon. The most likely things to happen will be that Trump wins in 2024 by such huge numbers that no amount of fraud can overcome it and it might be to such a degree that even liberals will notice and realize that 2020 was not legitimate.
What if he still is President?
He could still be president but to appease a reasonable portion of the country would require elections even if it were for show. Even if the military came in and provided actual proof with video evidence, they'd still need to put on a show for an election or likely deal with months of mass riots.
Well, I'll take this over LARPers and gold/crapto Scholls reading us random message board posts as news or coming up with their own fever pitch pipe dreams. Unfortunately, I have to also weigh in the naysayers here and I'm not going to get my hopes up. Still, it's more than the usual Muller special nothing burger.
Let’s see something happen.. otherwise I’m tired of getting my hopes up over the last 10 things this board hyped up while callings doubters doomers and shills. Not to say I don’t think the good guys aren’t doing great things..
never happen
https://qalerts.app/?n=1927
Very much appreciate the link and I read it. Thanks! My point was that those who would have to adjudicate and enforce this (arrests) are all compromised. So although it technically should and could happen, we have gone too far for it to be carried out. I have been hoping for something like this to happen since Biden got inaugurated illegitimately. Yet here we are. I try to have hope but it has been a long time.
That's not true at all.
I would say that less than half the Justices of the SCOTUS are compromised and the arrests would be made by federal marshals or by the Marines or other military. There is no evidence that those people are compromised.
Those same marshals that locked up Gregg Phillips and Catherine with literally no charges, taking away their clothing and bedding...those marshals? Very heroic they are.
Most of top tier of miliary is woke and compromised, and US Marshals are part of DOJ
The joint chiefs are not in charge of the military.
Great - several place son the internet say the Marshals report to the DOJ
Yes U.S. Marshals Service under the DOJ, however they are Federal Court Officers first and perform any duties ordered by the Federal Court. By tradition they also have individual State arrest authority.
Is there a place that shows the current number of sealed indictments?
https://bad-boys.us/
Thanks! Holy hell, that's a lot of sealed indictments!
YW. before '17 the yearly ave was 1000 sealed. keep in mind too sealed r unsealed regularly yet the sealed #s keep growing. YUGE!!!
That's pretty crazy. Really makes you think about all those congressmen that decided to not run for re-election in record numbers.
Be ready for those to be indictments against patriots while at the same time being hopeful they are not.
Excellent round table discussion. One thing that was stated, is how various DC players have given themselves immunity, and this is the frightening part. Let’s hope that there are ways to penetrate this field of immunity.
I am hoping...but not expecting.
It's Gone
If Brunson wins, who decides on the remedy?
So I was looking into some stuff about Freemasons and noticed their verbiage for their courts and hierarchies are word for word copypasted as our government terminology. They couldnt even create new words just blatently copied the same shit. I dont trust the civilian courts to save us here. Military is the only way.
Video not found? Deleted?
So if the SC does not do their job of correcting the traitors whom did not do their job, what are we left with?
a corrupt Supreme Court, which in my opinion is most likely. Let's see what happens.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/28/ted-cruz-john-eastman-jan6-committee/
Read the above article to know some more details about the 10-day audit that was proposed