That third line does not make sense. Misusing "infer" when you should use "imply" is a very common mistake. I am no grammar nazi and I would not ordinarily consider it sufficiently important to flag up. BUT... this is Q and, as we know, literal meanings of words are important.
Yeah most of the first person singular references seem to be in the first like... few dozen drops or so. Even then there are only a handful of them, but they do exist.
No, it isn't. Here's an example -
https://qagg.news/?read=170
u/#q170
That third line does not make sense. Misusing "infer" when you should use "imply" is a very common mistake. I am no grammar nazi and I would not ordinarily consider it sufficiently important to flag up. BUT... this is Q and, as we know, literal meanings of words are important.
Well spotted! I learn something every day.
Interesting! Seems it’s not that common, though, and very interesting that first person was used in the very early days of the drops.
Yeah most of the first person singular references seem to be in the first like... few dozen drops or so. Even then there are only a handful of them, but they do exist.
Does Q saying he was there in the day infer he wasn't employed nine to five or his job was military intelligence and that's what he did all day?