Clandestine-Bioterrorism is alive and well.-link below
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
And this
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDh8tpLk/lets-have-a-talk-about-new-q-pos/
.
(I didn't down-vote you, btw). So I'm reading up on this issue and lots of pros and cons. Here's one that may support your take (though I'd have liked to actually hear your take other than "no").
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZE4aEKdc/so-you-think-trip-q-is-babyfist-/c/
.
I'm not convinced and you appear to be. Fog of war, I suppose.
Thanks for the clarification of your stance, but I'm thinking more in technical terms. I was not here from the beginning like many of you were; in fact, I didn't find GAW/Q at all until after the 2020 elections and Q had stopped posting by then. I've always been hazy on the technicalities of the trip code (though some really smart anons have taken the time to try and explain it to me). That said - and feel free to correct me - I thought there was some sort of technical threshold that had to be met to verify that the real Q had returned - whether that's this trip code or a combination of that and something else. And this is where I'm not seeing that there's clarity for these recent posts to be considered from the real Q. I'm still reading up on both sides of this, literally hundreds of comments and trying to understand this.
You're obviously of the mindset that whatever threshold the original Q (and, yes, I understand it's a team not a person) set forth before he left (to verify it would be him upon return) has been met. There was a "problem post", but you're saying that was an anomaly and doesn't detract from the validity of the others. I can respect that - no offense was intended in my original comment - but since I'm unclear on the original Q criteria, I'm unable to be convinced at this point in time. Plus... I'm looking at these latest Q posts and they have a decidedly different tone. I've read some commentary here by other anons that this could simply signify we're in a new phase.
In any case. Thank you for taking your time. I don't mean to be chewing up your time, but this fog of war is truly thick. Regards.
Busy day today. I'll try to get back to you later.
I just wanted to reply to this last comment of yours on this thread... I think you're saying post #4516 provided you with some kind of epiphany. I'm not sure I'm following, but if I had to guess regarding entry techniques, you're referring to how to drop red pills as the link in that post refers to as an example. (Some of the formerly-dead links in the Q-Posts appear to be active again so this will help). I could be out in left field now, am just going on the post link and the fact you had some sort of revelation related to "dragonfly". It's interesting that you chose that post to highlight as some of the posts around that time mesh with the newest posts regarding the "mission" for anons.
As with this example you've given, part of the problem with coming in late to the game is that a lot of analysis and discussion has happened amongst old-timers (including lurkers like yourself) who were around when these drops were occurring that newer anons are not privy to and can't possibly get the same perspective on. Ah, well, we fumble forward as best we can.
One other point of yours I wanted to comment on is this: "...Direct b/c you cast doubt on what may be important comms, right off the bat, based on a very specific incident that happened 10 drops and 5 months ago. ..." While I may not agree with you that this current poster is a "real Q", I also can't say definitively that it's NOT. All I can go on with my limited perspective is pro and con arguments I'm reading by people much more capable than me in making this determination. Others have noted that the recent drops are not providing any new intelligence and could have been written by anyone on the outside with a rudimentary grasp of the historical Q-drops. That notwithstanding, your saying that these (and perhaps future ones by the same person) may be important comms is a good, solid point. They're worth analyzing under the circumstances and if, in the future, current-Q ever goes off the rails and calls for civil war or the like I doubt anyone here will be following him/her over the proverbial cliff.
I really hope we can get clear answers at some point, even after-the-fact, about at least some of this strategy. One thing for sure... God Wins. That's good enough for me. Best regards, anon.