Everywhere that Whites live they are under attack. One really should think about why this is so. Do you really believe in the left's fake and canned reasons that they use to justify it? Don't give me the colonial narrative because it falls apart when other races are scrutinized. The conquest of Islam is a really good example, but we are never taught this in the public schools? Why is this? There's a huge cover-up here. I'll provide evidence of this in a moment, but let's first look at the hatred toward Whites, who are are arguably the most enslaved race in all of history. Islam has always been associated with slavery. Did you know Islam waged over 548 battles with the classic civilization of Greece and Rome?
There were over 200 battles in Spain alone. North Africa, the Middle East, and India are not included in this count. Islam has killed more people under its barbarous rule than any other conquest in all of history.**
A sample taken for a 25 year period (1975 to 2000) found there has been 225 books written on the Christian Crusades compared to only one book written on the Islamic conquest. Let’s be honest, the Crusades were a failure compared to the vast Islamic conquest of the lands extending from Spain to India.
All lands except Spain and India have been retained by Islam. The Islamic conquest was quick and brutal. We know in an expanse of only sixty years, Islam spread from the lands extending from Spain to India.
Islam is not a religion of peace. It is the exact opposite.
Islam is a political ideology of perpetual brutality and war masquerading as a religion.
It is comprised of despotic laws set over the masses for the purpose of controlling the populace under autocratic rule. Contrarily, the Muslim autocracy and its elite live their lives behind the security of guarded compounds. Their privacy, wealth, and political power, in effect, make them exempt from these same draconian laws. Under this ideology, the Islamic male is entreated to be master over women, who are treated as chattel with few rights if any.
Why isn't any other race today being attacked and marked for extermination? Did you know only the Caucasian race is decreasing while all the others are increasing? Maybe the the real reason is that Europeans have been the vanguards of Christianity and that Christianity is the real enemy to all these other people. Let's face it, it doesn't matter if you are an atheist or 'something' else, if you are White, you are already condemned to being Christian because your ancestors were. The liberal Whites who stand against Christians are useful idiots to all those who want to forever criminalize and destroy Christianity. Why did Christianity spread so readily to Europeans? Maybe this is why Jesus said-- “My sheep hear My voice.” Only the Lord’s true sheep follow and obey Him because they know and recognize His voice. Jesus said, “My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me” (John 10:27). Maybe this is why Jesus said- "Do not go in the way of the nations, but rather go to the lost sheep of the House of Israel." Why has a declaration of war been declared by the enemies Jesus Christ on Christians? Satanists have combined forces with Kabbalists, and Islam to exterminate us.
Yes, the anti-white crap is just satanic anti-Christian crap. Jesus lived in Asia, but Christianity gained more traction in Europe than in Asia, or in Africa which is closer to the land that Jesus walked than Europe is. Why was that? Some people say that Christianity found its people in whites, and that their historic breeding for empathy and altruism was fertile ground for adopting the Golden Rule.
Over the most recent century, American white Christians have become the most charitable group per capita in world history, and have done an immense amount of good work in spreading the gospel to billions of people around the world. That’s why the satanic communists want to harm America and white people.
I have always loathed the "religion of peace" phrase, especially when Bush used to fling it around whenever he could. It's like everything else with leftists; just the opposite of the truth.
Specifically they want to rule more Asians because they are more passive than other races. Look at China. Very low energy, very passive. Holding up blank sheets of paper, singing, taping everything on their cell phones. No action. The least they could do is swarm the cops when people are being taken and dismantle their vehicles by removing air from the tires. While the police are taking care of that, get the people off the van/bus. Look in the home and garden for tools to help you! There are THOUSANDS of ways. Japan prohibits guns, yet that guy who shot Abe made one at home.
Wait, whites are the biggest victims now? Historically and now? So they have historically lost but the winners are giving whites the trophies? I always thought of whites as the victors in a certain sense. So why are they weaker than all of the other races again?
The history of 'Whites' is far different than the 'permitted' history books report. Did you know the first slaves to America were White? Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too. The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the slave merchants themselves.
In George Sandy’s laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved "forever." The service of Whites bound to Berkeley's Hundred was deemed "perpetual."
I'm not really buying America had to carry the crucifix and be sacrificed for all of Christendom's slavery bit. In comparison to Islam and the rest of the world, Christianity wasn't big promoters of slavery. In fact, the Catholic Church condemned slavery in 1435. The Catholic Church unhesitatingly condemned racial slavery as soon as it began. In 1435, six decades before Columbus sailed, Pope Eugene IV condemned the enslavement of the black natives of the Canary Islands, and ordered their European masters to manumit the enslaved within 15 days, under pain of excommunication. In 1537, Pope Paul III condemned the enslavement of West Indian and South American natives, and explicitly attributed that evil, "unheard of before now," to "the enemy of the human race," Satan.
Papal condemnations of slavery were repeated by Popes Gregory XIV (1591), Urban VIII (1639), Innocent XI (1686), Benedict XIV (1741), and Piux VII (1815). In 1839, Pope Gregory XVI wrote,
"We, by apostolic authority, warn and strongly exhort... that no one in the future dare to bother unjustly, despoil of their possessions, or reduce to slavery Indians, Blacks or other such peoples."
Pope Leo XIII (1890), too, condemned slavery, and so did the Second Vatican Council
So, how did slavery continue in the Vatican influenced sphere? Most Americans don't realize either that the transatlantic slave trade was driven by the sugar trade and rum. By the very nature of this fact, it redirects us to where sugar cane grew. This of course was in the tropical regions of the Caribbean and Central and South America. This is where 97% of the transatlantic slaves went. The 3% came to America later. According to one well-regarded census, 9.6 million Africans arrived alive in the so-called "New World" from the 16th century through the 19th century. Of these, 427,000, were brought to what is now the United States.
I could continue and talk about Islam and Judaism's belief in slavery and its widespread involvement in slave trade. Europe as far away as Iceland have been the recipients of Islamic raids enslaving people living in coastal dwellings. The entire Dark Ages was a result of Islamic salve trade and piracy on the Mediterranean Sea and elsewhere. The estimates of Europeans being kidnapped and enslaved is unknown, but the estimates from that time frame is in the millions. Slavery is actually now bigger and widespread than it ever was.
There isn't an ideology on the planet that's come even close to killing as many people as what the mind of Jewish men has brought forth.
Communism, Marxism, Bolsheviks, Nazism, Fascism, Globalism etc. All of these are Jewish inventions. Pornography, the education system, banking, usury, multiculturalism, feminism, the LGBT movement etc are all Jewish born movements spread through out the world.
Christianity vs Islam during conquest is easily debatable. Islam hasn't even come close to spreading as far as Christianity did and if you think that was through voluntary order, you're in a coma.
Islam spread so quickly because the Persian and Roman empires were at war with each other and exhausted themselves. Of course if was gonna be quick.
"Women have few rights" in Islam? What's the difference between male rights over females when comparing Christianity and Islam? It's the exact same thing lmao.
"I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you." Genesis 3:16.
“Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.” Ephesians 5:22-24
If you're gonna compare at least follow the reality of the writings.
As far as Europeans being the chosen, get your head of out of your ass. That's now how God works and even if you did want to argue that, South America is the most Christian place on the planet and it's not even close to being as white as Europe.
Most Europeans don't even give a shit about religion especially in the West and North.
And population decline is not only affecting white people. Chinese, Japanese, most of the Middle East are all facing catastrophic birth rates. And those very same demographics are face birth declines in the west within one generation. They're drinking the same shitty water and shitty food as you and I.
Why isn't any other race being marked? Simple. The system is done with them. They brought the Chinese to the brink of extinction and then allowed them to explode for slave labor and now they're exterminating them again via various methods to ensure a compliant as possible state.
Japanese are being overworked to death, by the system. The same financial system that runs in the US and the rest of the world.
The Middle East has literally been bombed to smithereens. Entire generations of children are gone. "Marked for extermination" is subjective. There are more ways than one to kill people.
And I used to think like you about how different Muslims were. Then I went to the Middle East and saw for myself how regular people are. I can tell you one thing, anywhere there's money, no female is leaving. Saudi women would laugh at you if you asked them to go to the west even with all their "oppression".
You must be responding to a different person's post. I never mentioned "Jewish men" or "Jewish" anything, you did. It's not germane to my topic. So, you must be responding to 'some' other individual.
"Islam hasn't even come close to spreading as far as Christianity did and if you think that was through voluntary order, you're in a coma."
I never mentioned this subject. You did. It does not follow the topic. Again you must be responding to 'someone' else.
"Islam spread so quickly because the Persian and Roman empires were at war with each other and exhausted themselves. Of course if was gonna be quick."
Again, non sequitur. You mentioned this. I did not. Morever, the Persian Empire and Roman Empire were different eras many hundreds of years apart. So, they weren't ever at war with each other. Islam is much later.
< ""Women have few rights" in Islam?"
If you want to argue with leading academics (to which I quoted from) go forth and try. The consensus far outweighs your opinion though.
Bostom, A. G. ‘The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic holy war and the fate of the non-Muslims.’ Prometheus Books. New York. 2005.
Khan, M. A. ‘Islamic Jihad: A legacy of forced conversion, imperialism and slavery.’ iUniverse, Bloomington, IN. 2009. (An Indian ex-Muslim) – FULL PDF BOOK HERE
Lal [a], K.S. Muslims invade India p 433-455 in Bostom (1) above.
Lal [b], K.S. Jihad under the Turks and jihad under the Mughals p 456-461 in Bostom (1) above.
Lal [c], K.S. Slave-taking during Muslim rule p535-548 in Bostom (1) above.
Lal [d], K.S. Enslavement of Hindus by Arab and Turkish invaders p 549-554 in bostom (1) above.
Lal [e], K.S. The Origins of Muslim slave system p 529-534 in bostom (1) above.
Reliance of the Traveller: A classic manual of Islamic sacred law. In Arabic with facing English Text, commentary and appendices edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller Al-Misri, Ahmad ibn Naqib; Amana publications Maryland USA 1994.
Sookhdeo, P. ‘Global Jihad: The future in the face of Militant Islam.’ Isaac Publishing. 2007.
Trifkovic, S. ‘The sword of the prophet.’ Regina Orthodox Press, Inc. 2002.
Ye’or, Bat. ‘Islam and Dhimmitude: Where civilisations collide’ translated from the French by Miriam Kochan and David Littman. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press 2002, reprint 2005.
"As far as Europeans being the chosen, get your head of out of your ass."
I never said this. You did. Reread my post and stop inventing subject matter.
"Most Europeans don't even give a shit about religion especially in the West and North."
WTH are you talking about? This doesn't relate to what I was talking about. Your entire post sounds more like it was responding to 'someone' else. Again, if you want to argue with the academics, go for it. The weight of consensus is against you.
To summarize, you erect a false dichotomy by injecting the Jews into the topic, but it appears to have failed for garnering support. Your response contains repugnant remarks that are uncalled for and sit at the very bottom of Graham's Hierarchy of Argument. Then you jump to Contradictions and subject matter that is non sequitur to what I wrote. Reread the entire post. Review the linked article and video. And be respectful to all you meet. It seems your emphasis was intent on undermining Christian values and history. You should know you are to be an ambassador reflecting God's love.
I injected the Jewish inventions which have killed far more and destroyed far more than any ideology out there because you made a statement that Islam was the cause of the most.
You wrote 400m indians died during the Muslim conquest of India and the best estimates for the entire planets population at that time was 250m lmao.
The amount of lies or just outright bullshit you spewed out there is insane.
And the Roman and Persian empires went at it for decades "they were hundreds of years apart" lmao. It's literally called the Roman-Persian wars. How can anyone take your ass seriously when you don't even know about the Roman Persian wars there are even video games about it lmaoooo.
And stop pretending with the "I never said this". You implied everything I responded to and now you're weaseling your way out of it.
"Leading academics" lmao I posted quotes directly from the Bible. It's the exact same thing as the Quran in regards to how womens rights are.
Why would I need "leading academics" when I have two books to reference lol
I love the women's rights bullshit from so called Christians. Buddy, if you followed the Bible with the same energy you hate on Muslims you'd see there ain't much of a difference lol
Everywhere that Whites live they are under attack. One really should think about why this is so. Do you really believe in the left's fake and canned reasons that they use to justify it? Don't give me the colonial narrative because it falls apart when other races are scrutinized. The conquest of Islam is a really good example, but we are never taught this in the public schools? Why is this? There's a huge cover-up here. I'll provide evidence of this in a moment, but let's first look at the hatred toward Whites, who are are arguably the most enslaved race in all of history. Islam has always been associated with slavery. Did you know Islam waged over 548 battles with the classic civilization of Greece and Rome?
There were over 200 battles in Spain alone. North Africa, the Middle East, and India are not included in this count. Islam has killed more people under its barbarous rule than any other conquest in all of history.**
In India alone, over 400 million people were brutally murdered under Islamic occupation.
A sample taken for a 25 year period (1975 to 2000) found there has been 225 books written on the Christian Crusades compared to only one book written on the Islamic conquest. Let’s be honest, the Crusades were a failure compared to the vast Islamic conquest of the lands extending from Spain to India.
All lands except Spain and India have been retained by Islam. The Islamic conquest was quick and brutal. We know in an expanse of only sixty years, Islam spread from the lands extending from Spain to India.
Islam is not a religion of peace. It is the exact opposite.
Islam is a political ideology of perpetual brutality and war masquerading as a religion.
It is comprised of despotic laws set over the masses for the purpose of controlling the populace under autocratic rule. Contrarily, the Muslim autocracy and its elite live their lives behind the security of guarded compounds. Their privacy, wealth, and political power, in effect, make them exempt from these same draconian laws. Under this ideology, the Islamic male is entreated to be master over women, who are treated as chattel with few rights if any.
Why isn't any other race today being attacked and marked for extermination? Did you know only the Caucasian race is decreasing while all the others are increasing? Maybe the the real reason is that Europeans have been the vanguards of Christianity and that Christianity is the real enemy to all these other people. Let's face it, it doesn't matter if you are an atheist or 'something' else, if you are White, you are already condemned to being Christian because your ancestors were. The liberal Whites who stand against Christians are useful idiots to all those who want to forever criminalize and destroy Christianity. Why did Christianity spread so readily to Europeans? Maybe this is why Jesus said-- “My sheep hear My voice.” Only the Lord’s true sheep follow and obey Him because they know and recognize His voice. Jesus said, “My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me” (John 10:27). Maybe this is why Jesus said- "Do not go in the way of the nations, but rather go to the lost sheep of the House of Israel." Why has a declaration of war been declared by the enemies Jesus Christ on Christians? Satanists have combined forces with Kabbalists, and Islam to exterminate us.
Yes, the anti-white crap is just satanic anti-Christian crap. Jesus lived in Asia, but Christianity gained more traction in Europe than in Asia, or in Africa which is closer to the land that Jesus walked than Europe is. Why was that? Some people say that Christianity found its people in whites, and that their historic breeding for empathy and altruism was fertile ground for adopting the Golden Rule.
Over the most recent century, American white Christians have become the most charitable group per capita in world history, and have done an immense amount of good work in spreading the gospel to billions of people around the world. That’s why the satanic communists want to harm America and white people.
Thank you for your post. I have a sense that speaking the truth will get harder and harder as we progress.
I have always loathed the "religion of peace" phrase, especially when Bush used to fling it around whenever he could. It's like everything else with leftists; just the opposite of the truth.
KALERGI PLAN: Eliminate and dilute the white race so the leftover mixed people will be easier to control.Plan for a world wide Jewish Zionist government http://www.hist-chron.com/judentum-aktenlage/zionismus/op/Kalergi/ENGL-Kalergi-plan.html
Specifically they want to rule more Asians because they are more passive than other races. Look at China. Very low energy, very passive. Holding up blank sheets of paper, singing, taping everything on their cell phones. No action. The least they could do is swarm the cops when people are being taken and dismantle their vehicles by removing air from the tires. While the police are taking care of that, get the people off the van/bus. Look in the home and garden for tools to help you! There are THOUSANDS of ways. Japan prohibits guns, yet that guy who shot Abe made one at home.
Wait, whites are the biggest victims now? Historically and now? So they have historically lost but the winners are giving whites the trophies? I always thought of whites as the victors in a certain sense. So why are they weaker than all of the other races again?
The history of 'Whites' is far different than the 'permitted' history books report. Did you know the first slaves to America were White? Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too. The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the slave merchants themselves.
In George Sandy’s laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved "forever." The service of Whites bound to Berkeley's Hundred was deemed "perpetual."
I'm not really buying America had to carry the crucifix and be sacrificed for all of Christendom's slavery bit. In comparison to Islam and the rest of the world, Christianity wasn't big promoters of slavery. In fact, the Catholic Church condemned slavery in 1435. The Catholic Church unhesitatingly condemned racial slavery as soon as it began. In 1435, six decades before Columbus sailed, Pope Eugene IV condemned the enslavement of the black natives of the Canary Islands, and ordered their European masters to manumit the enslaved within 15 days, under pain of excommunication. In 1537, Pope Paul III condemned the enslavement of West Indian and South American natives, and explicitly attributed that evil, "unheard of before now," to "the enemy of the human race," Satan.
Papal condemnations of slavery were repeated by Popes Gregory XIV (1591), Urban VIII (1639), Innocent XI (1686), Benedict XIV (1741), and Piux VII (1815). In 1839, Pope Gregory XVI wrote,
"We, by apostolic authority, warn and strongly exhort... that no one in the future dare to bother unjustly, despoil of their possessions, or reduce to slavery Indians, Blacks or other such peoples."
Pope Leo XIII (1890), too, condemned slavery, and so did the Second Vatican Council
So, how did slavery continue in the Vatican influenced sphere? Most Americans don't realize either that the transatlantic slave trade was driven by the sugar trade and rum. By the very nature of this fact, it redirects us to where sugar cane grew. This of course was in the tropical regions of the Caribbean and Central and South America. This is where 97% of the transatlantic slaves went. The 3% came to America later. According to one well-regarded census, 9.6 million Africans arrived alive in the so-called "New World" from the 16th century through the 19th century. Of these, 427,000, were brought to what is now the United States.
I could continue and talk about Islam and Judaism's belief in slavery and its widespread involvement in slave trade. Europe as far away as Iceland have been the recipients of Islamic raids enslaving people living in coastal dwellings. The entire Dark Ages was a result of Islamic salve trade and piracy on the Mediterranean Sea and elsewhere. The estimates of Europeans being kidnapped and enslaved is unknown, but the estimates from that time frame is in the millions. Slavery is actually now bigger and widespread than it ever was.
There isn't an ideology on the planet that's come even close to killing as many people as what the mind of Jewish men has brought forth.
Communism, Marxism, Bolsheviks, Nazism, Fascism, Globalism etc. All of these are Jewish inventions. Pornography, the education system, banking, usury, multiculturalism, feminism, the LGBT movement etc are all Jewish born movements spread through out the world.
Christianity vs Islam during conquest is easily debatable. Islam hasn't even come close to spreading as far as Christianity did and if you think that was through voluntary order, you're in a coma.
Islam spread so quickly because the Persian and Roman empires were at war with each other and exhausted themselves. Of course if was gonna be quick.
"Women have few rights" in Islam? What's the difference between male rights over females when comparing Christianity and Islam? It's the exact same thing lmao. "I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you." Genesis 3:16. “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.” Ephesians 5:22-24
If you're gonna compare at least follow the reality of the writings.
As far as Europeans being the chosen, get your head of out of your ass. That's now how God works and even if you did want to argue that, South America is the most Christian place on the planet and it's not even close to being as white as Europe.
Most Europeans don't even give a shit about religion especially in the West and North.
And population decline is not only affecting white people. Chinese, Japanese, most of the Middle East are all facing catastrophic birth rates. And those very same demographics are face birth declines in the west within one generation. They're drinking the same shitty water and shitty food as you and I.
Why isn't any other race being marked? Simple. The system is done with them. They brought the Chinese to the brink of extinction and then allowed them to explode for slave labor and now they're exterminating them again via various methods to ensure a compliant as possible state.
Japanese are being overworked to death, by the system. The same financial system that runs in the US and the rest of the world.
The Middle East has literally been bombed to smithereens. Entire generations of children are gone. "Marked for extermination" is subjective. There are more ways than one to kill people.
And I used to think like you about how different Muslims were. Then I went to the Middle East and saw for myself how regular people are. I can tell you one thing, anywhere there's money, no female is leaving. Saudi women would laugh at you if you asked them to go to the west even with all their "oppression".
It's not as simple as "boohoo poor me"
You must be responding to a different person's post. I never mentioned "Jewish men" or "Jewish" anything, you did. It's not germane to my topic. So, you must be responding to 'some' other individual.
I never mentioned this subject. You did. It does not follow the topic. Again you must be responding to 'someone' else.
Again, non sequitur. You mentioned this. I did not. Morever, the Persian Empire and Roman Empire were different eras many hundreds of years apart. So, they weren't ever at war with each other. Islam is much later.
< ""Women have few rights" in Islam?"
If you want to argue with leading academics (to which I quoted from) go forth and try. The consensus far outweighs your opinion though.
I never said this. You did. Reread my post and stop inventing subject matter.
WTH are you talking about? This doesn't relate to what I was talking about. Your entire post sounds more like it was responding to 'someone' else. Again, if you want to argue with the academics, go for it. The weight of consensus is against you.
To summarize, you erect a false dichotomy by injecting the Jews into the topic, but it appears to have failed for garnering support. Your response contains repugnant remarks that are uncalled for and sit at the very bottom of Graham's Hierarchy of Argument. Then you jump to Contradictions and subject matter that is non sequitur to what I wrote. Reread the entire post. Review the linked article and video. And be respectful to all you meet. It seems your emphasis was intent on undermining Christian values and history. You should know you are to be an ambassador reflecting God's love.
I injected the Jewish inventions which have killed far more and destroyed far more than any ideology out there because you made a statement that Islam was the cause of the most.
You wrote 400m indians died during the Muslim conquest of India and the best estimates for the entire planets population at that time was 250m lmao.
The amount of lies or just outright bullshit you spewed out there is insane.
And the Roman and Persian empires went at it for decades "they were hundreds of years apart" lmao. It's literally called the Roman-Persian wars. How can anyone take your ass seriously when you don't even know about the Roman Persian wars there are even video games about it lmaoooo.
And stop pretending with the "I never said this". You implied everything I responded to and now you're weaseling your way out of it.
"Leading academics" lmao I posted quotes directly from the Bible. It's the exact same thing as the Quran in regards to how womens rights are.
Why would I need "leading academics" when I have two books to reference lol
I love the women's rights bullshit from so called Christians. Buddy, if you followed the Bible with the same energy you hate on Muslims you'd see there ain't much of a difference lol
You're full of shit.