I have noticed certain posters are posting constantly sometimes in 1 minute intervals which is physically impossible. Elon noticed the same thing on twitter. Is GAW infested with BOTS who don’t appear to sleep and have over one million posts?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
I still think there should be a post limit per day. There are a few accounts that post EVERYTHING THEY CAN POSSIBLY THINK OF and it's just insane.
I blocked one of them because it was mostly noise, and am considering another 1 or 2.... One of them only regurgitates stuff mainly from TS for example....
One person was called out for the constant posting 24 hours per day and they replied with verbally abusive BS that should never be tolerated here.
I would not be surprised. They probably won't see this discussion of course, as the people doing this basically almost NEVER interact in any post not their own. So I'm guessing whoever you're referring to has a very high likelihood of being in this category.
👍
😽
I counted 91 posts made by the same person one day. That's a lot.
And this morning 13 consecutive posts from one contributor, and its only the start of the day. Makes you wonder what drives this urge...
Thank you. I cannot stand the effing a-hole and have not posted here in a long time because of the likes of him and his ilk. This place has really become a sad parody and glad I at least saw this to get a chance to say my piece. Back to other more worthwhile pursuits.
u/bubble_bursts
u/catsfive
Is that even possible? Have to say, that might be worth considering. increase quality by slightly restricting volume.
I can probably answer this - the mods have stated they don't have access to the source code running the site, so probably not unless whoever's doing the .win site itself implemented the option and site mods could turn it on for their site. They can probably only admonish/remove users if they desire to do so (so far there does not seem to be this desire, so "power contributors" I suppose are being seen/appreciated as such). Perhaps an Elon-style poll....
Thanks for the thoughts, Pep.
I guess if they thought that the uber-posting of some of out more prolific contributors was problematic or less than helpful, they could easily message them with a request or guidance. So far, they seem happy.
I really like Ashlands, but when I see 12 posts all covering the NEW stream, well, I don't know. I guess I haven't really paid too much attention to whether there are any active sliders out there. Regarding Purkiss, I wish you guys would cool off a bit. I do think Pur is very touchy, and in the past, I challenged him quite a bit for some of his less than diligent posting practices (i.e. indicating source, posting in ways that simply lets board pedes think HE is the source, when he's just conveying Tgram stuff, etc.)
But, I put it up to good intent, and simply practices that I personally would take a lot more care on. These days, however, I very rarely look at Pur's stuff, and I'm also happy to see that other pedes are posting telegram etc content. Before, it seemed always pur, but these days, more folks have stepped up to convey and connect info from others sources, esp telegram.