It's been pointed out here (sorry I forget by whom) that it's a catch-22, because if they don't take it up THEY are failing to do their prime job, which is enforcing the Constitution - at which point the military would really be the only way.
The SC has already had MULTIPLE opportunities to quietly shut down this case before it ever got to this point. In fact, this is exactly what all the "expert" lawyers have been predicting every time this case is mentioned (Tracy Beanz is a good example).
The lawyers have been unanimous in their predictions that the SC would never touch this case. That it was a nothing burger. They have been proven wrong through every step of the process so far.
The SC has in fact gone out of their way to help bring the case forward. Let that REALLY sink in for a minute...
Why would the SC actively encourage the Brunson brothers to file the case (with modifications requested by the SC), only to then have it fail the conference vote on Jan. 6th? Does that make any sense to anyone?
Unless the whole thing is just a political move by the SC to warn the Congress not to try to impose term limits or pack the court. Who knows? We will see soon enough, starting with what the lame duck Congress does this month...
True but the Brunson's are arguing a national security breech which is technically a matter of military courts but still within the jurisdiction of the SC.
"modifications" - didn't the SC also reject one of the election ones (IIRC the big TX/several other states one) with instructions on how to resubmit, and that never actually happened? I swear I remember this....
They proved that when they wouldnt even hear the case in 2020. There is not going to be a court solution to this. Not unless Q lied when he said the military is the only way. Dopium.
You are not thinking about optics here. Remember, they had to let them steal 2020 and 2022 elections. We can't be the only ones awaken, the rest of the US population needs to be awake before things can start rolling. Think about it. If they had tried to drain the swamp when Trump was still president, at the time, 50% still thought Trump was a russian asset, so the DS could have easily said that Trump is doing a coup. Then we would have had civil war. Even when Trump did his 2024 bid for president live announcement, he even stated towards the end of the speech that not enough people have woken up yet. So what I think is that the SC aided the DS to steal the election by not taking the cases, which gave the DS their ego boost thinking they won without suffering losses. So the DS thinks it controls the SC until the Roe v Wade situation. That showed to us that maybe white hats are in control. Because of Roe v Wade, the Demorats got shit on by their voter base for allowing this to happen. Now the DS knows that they dont control SC, so they try to pack it and set term limits. This also gives me an inclination that white hats are in control.
It's been pointed out here (sorry I forget by whom) that it's a catch-22, because if they don't take it up THEY are failing to do their prime job, which is enforcing the Constitution - at which point the military would really be the only way.
A lot of people are not able to think logically.
The SC has already had MULTIPLE opportunities to quietly shut down this case before it ever got to this point. In fact, this is exactly what all the "expert" lawyers have been predicting every time this case is mentioned (Tracy Beanz is a good example).
The lawyers have been unanimous in their predictions that the SC would never touch this case. That it was a nothing burger. They have been proven wrong through every step of the process so far.
The SC has in fact gone out of their way to help bring the case forward. Let that REALLY sink in for a minute...
Why would the SC actively encourage the Brunson brothers to file the case (with modifications requested by the SC), only to then have it fail the conference vote on Jan. 6th? Does that make any sense to anyone?
Unless the whole thing is just a political move by the SC to warn the Congress not to try to impose term limits or pack the court. Who knows? We will see soon enough, starting with what the lame duck Congress does this month...
I have to agree.
I am surprised this case made it this far but burden of proof for civil cases is usually less than a criminal case.
So because of that reason alone I never say never because you don't know what the SC is thinking if they allowed it to pass so many obstacles so far.
Since the SC only rules on whether a lower court ruling was Constitutional, isn't whether the lower court case was civil or criminal irrelevant?
True but the Brunson's are arguing a national security breech which is technically a matter of military courts but still within the jurisdiction of the SC.
"modifications" - didn't the SC also reject one of the election ones (IIRC the big TX/several other states one) with instructions on how to resubmit, and that never actually happened? I swear I remember this....
They proved that when they wouldnt even hear the case in 2020. There is not going to be a court solution to this. Not unless Q lied when he said the military is the only way. Dopium.
You are not thinking about optics here. Remember, they had to let them steal 2020 and 2022 elections. We can't be the only ones awaken, the rest of the US population needs to be awake before things can start rolling. Think about it. If they had tried to drain the swamp when Trump was still president, at the time, 50% still thought Trump was a russian asset, so the DS could have easily said that Trump is doing a coup. Then we would have had civil war. Even when Trump did his 2024 bid for president live announcement, he even stated towards the end of the speech that not enough people have woken up yet. So what I think is that the SC aided the DS to steal the election by not taking the cases, which gave the DS their ego boost thinking they won without suffering losses. So the DS thinks it controls the SC until the Roe v Wade situation. That showed to us that maybe white hats are in control. Because of Roe v Wade, the Demorats got shit on by their voter base for allowing this to happen. Now the DS knows that they dont control SC, so they try to pack it and set term limits. This also gives me an inclination that white hats are in control.
Military could still be the only way - either way.
They rule for, DOJ fails to enforce (and may move to arrest SC themselves) Mil steps in.
They rule against, Mil steps in and takes out all of them incl SC.
1 is most aligned w/Q IMO because it follows the rule of law more closely - think SCOTUS
Agreed. I used to think that option 2 was more likely, but then the SC reversed Roe v. Wade, and I changed my mind.
I now think option 1 is more likely. Quick and clean.