Reflecting on it, I could not escape the perfect Hegelian dialectic described by the author.
“Two forms of terrorism can provoke such a situation [breakdown of the state]: blind terrorism (committing massacres indiscriminately which cause a large number of victims), and selective terrorism (eliminate chosen persons)…
This destruction of the state must be carried out under the cover of ‘communist activities.’ After that, we must intervene at the heart of the military, the juridical power and the church, in order to influence popular opinion, suggest a solution, and clearly demonstrate the weakness of the present legal apparatus. Popular opinion must be polarized in such a way, that we are being presented as the only instrument capable of saving the nation.”
All in all, I would recommend to cut the coloration and focus on facts alone. Then a different type of Hegelian dialectic appears, on a much higher level. It would explain the sudden changes in direction in policies, for example regarding Greece.
Interesting write-up. Thanks for sharing, P.
Reflecting on it, I could not escape the perfect Hegelian dialectic described by the author.
All in all, I would recommend to cut the coloration and focus on facts alone. Then a different type of Hegelian dialectic appears, on a much higher level. It would explain the sudden changes in direction in policies, for example regarding Greece.
Interestingly, This Q post is related to that: https://qagg.news/?q=loyalists
Also of note is the role of the SOE and we get to Maxwell and his progeny. https://searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3925401
More on the Maxwell history. https://searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3916720