How can Twitter interfere? How can a 'social media platform' interfere in an election? PEOPLE did things, yeah, criminals and conspirators/traitors/seditionists, yeah sure....
Treason is the issue here, not a social media platform.
Propaganda is a weapon. Just like yelling "fire!" in a theater can kill people, the tech co.s know exactly the power of their weapons. I'm this case, Twitter sold its weapon just like a mercenary army, to traitorous politicians and foreigners.
Yes, it's those who wield the weapons who are guilty, and those that commanded them.
Propaganda is not political interference, it is mere theater. Propaganda also is not a weapon unless 'you' accept it as such and compete on those terms.
As a private entity twitters owes no one any accountability or protections of free speech, it is not obligated to edit or censor either one, but may do so as it wishes.
Hang the government employees, the liars in DoJ and Congress, the judges and FBI rank and file who should obey their Oaths instead of agendas and illegal orders, yeah.
But their crimes have nothing to do with a social media platform such as twitters. Twitters is not physically able to interfere unless they helped program dominion or other such direct criminal acts.
Certainly good points. I disagree as to the utility of propaganda as a weapon, especially noting big tech's extensive awareness of its uses and effectiveness.
It gets down to who controlled what, and how they used that control. If Twitter directors sold their services directly to a foreign power, knowing that it would help in their attempt to usurp the US government, I think treason charges would be appropriate. Also if any of them were US Gov't employees knowingly participating in those same activities. But I'm sure there's a lot of activity that doesn't meet the standard. We'll keep reading the installments to learn what we can.
How can Twitter interfere? How can a 'social media platform' interfere in an election? PEOPLE did things, yeah, criminals and conspirators/traitors/seditionists, yeah sure....
Treason is the issue here, not a social media platform.
Propaganda is a weapon. Just like yelling "fire!" in a theater can kill people, the tech co.s know exactly the power of their weapons. I'm this case, Twitter sold its weapon just like a mercenary army, to traitorous politicians and foreigners.
Yes, it's those who wield the weapons who are guilty, and those that commanded them.
Propaganda is not political interference, it is mere theater. Propaganda also is not a weapon unless 'you' accept it as such and compete on those terms.
As a private entity twitters owes no one any accountability or protections of free speech, it is not obligated to edit or censor either one, but may do so as it wishes.
Hang the government employees, the liars in DoJ and Congress, the judges and FBI rank and file who should obey their Oaths instead of agendas and illegal orders, yeah.
But their crimes have nothing to do with a social media platform such as twitters. Twitters is not physically able to interfere unless they helped program dominion or other such direct criminal acts.
Certainly good points. I disagree as to the utility of propaganda as a weapon, especially noting big tech's extensive awareness of its uses and effectiveness.
It gets down to who controlled what, and how they used that control. If Twitter directors sold their services directly to a foreign power, knowing that it would help in their attempt to usurp the US government, I think treason charges would be appropriate. Also if any of them were US Gov't employees knowingly participating in those same activities. But I'm sure there's a lot of activity that doesn't meet the standard. We'll keep reading the installments to learn what we can.
https://truthsocial.com/@JordanSather/posts/109450242931752312