F) You need to start to making & justifying your arguments against my arguments and laying out what you believe if you intend to participate in this discussion in a meaningful way. Stop acting like a wounded animal, get over your emotions, and make an actual argument.
For example:
Person 1: God is judging the world. Satan is the dominating evil power behind the SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, global elections and, consequently, immoral ideologies are destroying society and humanity. Nobody is going to destroy Satan but Christ in the end. Sauce: https://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html
Person 2: No, you’re a black piller. You’re taking God’s name in vain. You’re just avoided everything and you don’t know my beliefs because I don’t share them.
Person 1: Okay, explain your beliefs and arguments that justify you disagreeing with me.
Do you see why trying to have a meaningful discussion with you is losing my interest. I would not stay this long or keep replying if the topics didn’t matter but they do. If you don’t care enough to state your beliefs, then why attack and disagree with anyone to begin with????
G) Using biblical phrases like “out of context,” and “taking the lord’s name in vain” is not a meaningful response to anything I said. If I had cursed by using the Lord’s name, intentionally rejected Him, blasphemed, or attributed something evil to Him, then, yea, that would be taking His name in vain. You’re obviously biblically illiterate outside of likely having faith in Christ and His life, death, and resurrection, but you chose to act this way and falsely accuse me of something that has not occurred (taking God’s name in vain).
H) If you think my conclusion that God is judging all the nations of the world and that Satan will not be conquered by human beings (but only by Christ at the cross, spiritually, and then at the end of the age in the last judgment in the temporal/physical sense of eliminating evil and the works of Satan in the world) is faulty, then make your counter argument and be concise. Otherwise, I’m losing interest in what you have to say… Not because you think I’m a black-piller, but because you’re not capable of keeping up with the arguments (and you don’t understand the things you say regarding the Word of God).
I see now that your theological and doctrinal understandings differ from mine. For example, tares among the wheat as relating to the final judgment vs. the Tribulation. Even the subject of taking the Lord’s name in vain as relating to our entire discussion.
You and me are obviously on polar opposites regarding the current state of humanity (politically, religiously, and the nature of Satan’s work behind that). We differ as well on our expectations of the good guys vs. the bad guys, the white hats vs. the black hats, Trump/Q/Q+ and the patriots vs. the swamp/the cabal (intimately the devil and what is granted to him until the final judgment). Wherever your beliefs fall within the spectrum of the patriots/Trump/Q etc., you have an expectation of victory that does not comport with the Bible. I’ve done what I can to lay out how and why that is the case as I see it in Scripture and in reality.
Where am I going with this? Well, you seem to have the impulse of taking the lowest road and accusing me of taking the Lord’s name in vain. I am not convinced you truly believe that. You wrongfully accuse me, once again, of “invoking God to win political arguments.” But when I tell you that the victory you expect is not coming, and then I qualify that with God’s revelation of the future time to come (when Satan’s power in the world system of evil is defeated once and for all), that’s not using the Lord’s name in vain. I’m not politically motivated… but the nature of the discussion heavily involves politics and religion as they relate to the coming Tribulation and what God has ordained to happen to the world (including trumpets and bowl judgments).
Either you accuse me in ignorance, or you do it in defiance. But I’m convinced, either way, you do it because I’m obligated to be labeled as a black-piller. That’s not much different than two Christian’s debating sovereign election and free will and then one accusing the other of not being saved.
The underlying problem as I see it is this: You’re being petty because I “defected,” and you think I should be banned because of it. How are you much different than a leftist or a raging Democrat when your belief system is challenged? Like Dems on Twitter, are you wanting me to be banned? When did I wound you? When was I malicious?
I want serious and meaningful discourse. If you do not, then just say so.
F) You need to start to making & justifying your arguments against my arguments and laying out what you believe if you intend to participate in this discussion in a meaningful way. Stop acting like a wounded animal, get over your emotions, and make an actual argument.
For example:
Person 1: God is judging the world. Satan is the dominating evil power behind the SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, global elections and, consequently, immoral ideologies are destroying society and humanity. Nobody is going to destroy Satan but Christ in the end. Sauce: https://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html
Person 2: No, you’re a black piller. You’re taking God’s name in vain. You’re just avoided everything and you don’t know my beliefs because I don’t share them.
Person 1: Okay, explain your beliefs and arguments that justify you disagreeing with me.
Do you see why trying to have a meaningful discussion with you is losing my interest. I would not stay this long or keep replying if the topics didn’t matter but they do. If you don’t care enough to state your beliefs, then why attack and disagree with anyone to begin with????
G) Using biblical phrases like “out of context,” and “taking the lord’s name in vain” is not a meaningful response to anything I said. If I had cursed by using the Lord’s name, intentionally rejected Him, blasphemed, or attributed something evil to Him, then, yea, that would be taking His name in vain. You’re obviously biblically illiterate outside of likely having faith in Christ and His life, death, and resurrection, but you chose to act this way and falsely accuse me of something that has not occurred (taking God’s name in vain).
H) If you think my conclusion that God is judging all the nations of the world and that Satan will not be conquered by human beings (but only by Christ at the cross, spiritually, and then at the end of the age in the last judgment in the temporal/physical sense of eliminating evil and the works of Satan in the world) is faulty, then make your counter argument and be concise. Otherwise, I’m losing interest in what you have to say… Not because you think I’m a black-piller, but because you’re not capable of keeping up with the arguments (and you don’t understand the things you say regarding the Word of God).
No I don't. You're already breaking forum rules just being here.
Insinuating that I need to do anything on your behalf is simply silly.
FYI, the only reason I'm typing this much in your direction is to accurately detect the current capabilities of DARPA AI bots.
Invoking God to win political arguments is the epitome of taking the Lord's name in vain.
Millions of miles away from your original premise.
Fortunately for you, I have great interest in AI bots, as they're closely related to my line of work.
Here is an article on the subject of “taking the Lord’s name in vain”: https://www.gotquestions.org/Lords-name-vain.html
I see now that your theological and doctrinal understandings differ from mine. For example, tares among the wheat as relating to the final judgment vs. the Tribulation. Even the subject of taking the Lord’s name in vain as relating to our entire discussion.
You and me are obviously on polar opposites regarding the current state of humanity (politically, religiously, and the nature of Satan’s work behind that). We differ as well on our expectations of the good guys vs. the bad guys, the white hats vs. the black hats, Trump/Q/Q+ and the patriots vs. the swamp/the cabal (intimately the devil and what is granted to him until the final judgment). Wherever your beliefs fall within the spectrum of the patriots/Trump/Q etc., you have an expectation of victory that does not comport with the Bible. I’ve done what I can to lay out how and why that is the case as I see it in Scripture and in reality.
Where am I going with this? Well, you seem to have the impulse of taking the lowest road and accusing me of taking the Lord’s name in vain. I am not convinced you truly believe that. You wrongfully accuse me, once again, of “invoking God to win political arguments.” But when I tell you that the victory you expect is not coming, and then I qualify that with God’s revelation of the future time to come (when Satan’s power in the world system of evil is defeated once and for all), that’s not using the Lord’s name in vain. I’m not politically motivated… but the nature of the discussion heavily involves politics and religion as they relate to the coming Tribulation and what God has ordained to happen to the world (including trumpets and bowl judgments).
Either you accuse me in ignorance, or you do it in defiance. But I’m convinced, either way, you do it because I’m obligated to be labeled as a black-piller. That’s not much different than two Christian’s debating sovereign election and free will and then one accusing the other of not being saved.
The underlying problem as I see it is this: You’re being petty because I “defected,” and you think I should be banned because of it. How are you much different than a leftist or a raging Democrat when your belief system is challenged? Like Dems on Twitter, are you wanting me to be banned? When did I wound you? When was I malicious? I want serious and meaningful discourse. If you do not, then just say so.