I'm flustered right now, so you guys are gonna have to deal with me just giving you the pieces, but this was too good to ignore.
Yoel Roth constantly uses underscores in his communications on Twitter's backend to emphasize things, as shown in the recent Twitter Files drops. Using this, we can even presume he's the person speaking even in some of these drops where the names are orange-barred out. His writing habits sorta give him away.
Some Examples:
https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1601746253284798469/photo/1
https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602365655595962368/photo/1
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601359872528101376/photo/1
Well, what does that prove?
Considering the Yoel Roth Twitter Files content came out on Dec 10th-11th, it proves a lot considering a particular Q post during that same delta time frame in 2017:
Eerie how that lines up, aye? Files using that syntax come out on a Q delta of the same sentence structure.
Now, we also see a reference to owls, as well as Q unusually using underscores to emphasize text (Q usually uses [brackets] to indicate "targets" in speech).
But, where else did we see owls in the Twitter Files drops?
Oh yeah, that's right. Internal Twitter staff call themselves "Owls."
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598852182572298241
Now does post 328 make a lot more sense? Q was throwing shade at Yoel Roth all the way back in 2017.
Q, in December of 2017, was showing they had access to Twitter's back channels, particularly Yoel Roth, and were monitoring the internal conversations there.
Amazing...
It appears as though Post 328, with the underscores, was really Q mocking them for not being able to figure out how they can see the backend conversations. Patriots really do "have it all."
This post days prior indicates the Roth(s) may have included Yoel Roth and his under-stooges at Twitter (not just the Rothschilds) and other installed in various Social Media rackets such as Facebook(LifeLog).
I believe that Elon Musk's Twitter purchase is a pretense for merely showing files on the Twitter back-end that Trump and Frens have had access to for 4+ years now. Which may indicate that we are finally in the DECLAS phase, where the public can now learn of these events without threatening ongoing operations.
Due to Q's posts, it's evident that these communications have been visible to White Hats for YEARS and I think it's a safe hopium dose to assume the DeepState Cabal still, to this day, have no idea how White Hats can read their back-channels and not get caught doing so.
Tell me what you think.
Repost until it happens.
If there is anyone who could claw back the tweets from this secret little account, it would Elon.
We should petition for the results to be revealed.
Free speech and all.
That way it can be put to bed on who exactly this Yoel Roth really is at heart. Is he a misunderstood gay man that sent out a few questionable tweets, which everyone slips up sometime, OR is he a rank-and-file degenerate who persecuted others while spewing his filth all over Twitter?
Despite privacy and all that, if he put it on Twitter, then it is public information and should not be protected.
If he tweeted degenerate stuff then, the truth would reveal him for who he really is.
There will always be people who will feel bad for him, simply because he is the perceived underdog (people are easy like that). He got chased out of his house, although it was his choice to leave, they will blame it on the right being violent.
Expose him for who he really is and put the whole matter to rest.
This might help you decide:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/yoelroth
He was hired onto Twitter for the express purpose of silencing speech, AND training others to do so as well. His previous position at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet suggests as much. He was put in charge of that.
Later, his title was changed to "safety" in an obtuse way of saying the same thing. He's making Twitter "safe" by protecting kiddie porn merchants from the big, bad meanies and their "hate speech."
I'm not disagreeing with you, but we have plenty enough to go on to assume he's a POS and has been well before his time at Twitter. His Tweets are just icing on the cake, in my opinion.
Also, there's this:
Holy shit, that last line though.
What were the "combat information operations and suspected state-backed activity" he's talking about?
Could it be? Dare I say?
Q?
Makes sense what we know now given Q's posts, aye?
Your post is amazing. I am still going through it. Thanks for the reply too. Great job!
As for Roth, you are right there, it is pretty safe to say he is POS, but I would love the satisfaction of it getting posted far and wide.
People are such easy targets; he can claim he has been driven from his home by right wingers and they will boo hoo for him. Of course, feeding their narrative.