I think this is a very sad situation, but how do you assassinate someone making an unprotected left turn? Did you read the article? Edit to be clear: I could give you my car's description, and probably even my daily routine, and I don't think you could 'assassinate' me in this manner if you tried every day for a year. So much conspiracy.
Can a satellite see the hair on your arm from space? Does geo location exist? Is he a sherriff in a hotly contested part of this whole ordeal? Do we not carry around things on such devices as vehicles, phones, and the like, that can ID us?
Is he really that hard to single out as a target?
Not hard to see where the logic in your argument falls flat.
"Isn't technology a thing?" is not great rhetoric, because it leads to a lot of hand-waving of logic. If I gave you my location in real-time, and I don't think this drunk Gilbert Arizona yocal had such, you still would have a very hard time hitting me oncoming while I made an unprotected left. You conspiracy folks are very 'Let no tragedy' go to waste. It's childish, gross, and a dumb way of thinking.
Occam's freaking Razor. I could give you my location in real-time, and I STILL don't think YOU could hit me as ONCOMING traffic, while I make an unprotected left turn at an intersection. This is so incredibly childish, and worse, takes a very TRAGIC event that has happened to someone we might admire, and adopts it for a narrative that might not be true
This is the exact same "Let no tragedy go to waste" BS from the other side.
I think this is a very sad situation, but how do you assassinate someone making an unprotected left turn? Did you read the article? Edit to be clear: I could give you my car's description, and probably even my daily routine, and I don't think you could 'assassinate' me in this manner if you tried every day for a year. So much conspiracy.
True. There is no guarantee a person will die In a crash like that. Stupidity doesn't have a political party.
To a VERY specific target - you left that part out. So yes... it'd be very tough. Grow up.
Can a satellite see the hair on your arm from space? Does geo location exist? Is he a sherriff in a hotly contested part of this whole ordeal? Do we not carry around things on such devices as vehicles, phones, and the like, that can ID us?
Is he really that hard to single out as a target?
Not hard to see where the logic in your argument falls flat.
"Isn't technology a thing?" is not great rhetoric, because it leads to a lot of hand-waving of logic. If I gave you my location in real-time, and I don't think this drunk Gilbert Arizona yocal had such, you still would have a very hard time hitting me oncoming while I made an unprotected left. You conspiracy folks are very 'Let no tragedy' go to waste. It's childish, gross, and a dumb way of thinking.
It's the method that is no good. Nobody said assassinations don't happen.
To think this is one defies logic and common sense.
Occam's freaking Razor. I could give you my location in real-time, and I STILL don't think YOU could hit me as ONCOMING traffic, while I make an unprotected left turn at an intersection. This is so incredibly childish, and worse, takes a very TRAGIC event that has happened to someone we might admire, and adopts it for a narrative that might not be true
This is the exact same "Let no tragedy go to waste" BS from the other side.