Now there is a good argument.
I haven't been to Australia. Always had wanted to. Not likely I will. If you visit the states, I wouldn't put NG at the top of the list to visit, certainly not in terms of attractions. (The one they had is gone now anyhow). That said, it's rural. Even today it is more than 90% white Christian. In 1980 that was likely 99.9% and still very rural. Not many coming or going either. Most families on the same land for generations,...pretty much since the trail of tears. Every small community tight knit. Go to any local cemetery in any town for 5 counties around and you find headstones with my surname going back to 1700. Not the most welcoming of places. Lots of farmers, working people. God fearing family folks. Could be none of that is relevant, or maybe at the heart of it. Interesting it was generally glossed over.
The stones will never be viewed as intended. The chances they would have ever been found were always deemed very low in any case. In the end I do agree this has been a better solution... their destruction that is... It was something of a surprise (likely not to everyone) they became an attraction at all. They were definitely not placed where they were to be an attraction. Of all the verbiage in all the languages and the time capsule and the astral alignments, one segment of one line..."maintain the population at 500,000,000", was continuously miss-read where in the misreading was the actual reading from the original manifesto it was taken from and accused of exposing. This was the crux of it. The exposure of elite eugenicists plans that are now in the public domain as a result of people made aware of the stones is staggering. One could argue that in the end their reach was far greater than ever imagined at their conception.
Ah the bliss of ignorance, as you clutch on to the rumours you all repeat to each other about how this amazing "brothers" who had "secret knowledge", just wanted to save humanity and nothing else, inscribed a message to the survivors of the future - not a message of hope or encouragement or empowerment, but one that told them how many of them could be allowed to survive and who gets to procreate.
Oh, the horrors these anonymous people (reminds of a typical CNN article with "anonymous sources close to the matter") must have suffered by being "ostracized" and "relieved of certain positions" - thank God they had to sacrifice only "certain positions" and not all.
The Great Awakening is gonna be much harder for those who are half awake in stupor specially created by the very same Satanic scum.
My question: Is there any difference between the average Lefty that calls for controlling the world's population based on what Schwab or Gates tells them VS someone like you, calling for the same thing for the future survivors, based on some unknown anonymous rumoured "brothers" "secret knowledge" ?
Hint: Different delivery mechanism, same brainwashing medicine.
Could be none of that is relevant, or maybe at the heart of it.
To people living there, I can easily imagine how important this is. For those of us looking from outside, it's simply another town with its secrets, not all benign.
"maintain the population at 500,000,000", was continuously miss-read where in the misreading was the actual reading from the original manifesto it was taken from and accused of exposing. This was the crux of it.
I agree that literally it says "maintain" and not "reduce", but imo its simply a question of semantics. You can read it how you want.
Example: Doctor says "I should maintain my weight below 70 kgs" and I weight 100 kg. Does it mean that first I have to lose some weight, and then maintain?
To me it does, and thats how I always read this, but even if you take it literally to mean "maintain at 500 mil after a cataclysm", who are these f*ckers to tell the surviving humanity what population they should have?
I don't think you are a shill and your heart seems to be in the right place, but your methods are insanely ineffective, and hope you take this advice in the spirit its intended - Its not enough to accumulate knowledge, its also important to disseminate it, and you have shown you can indeed do it, but its a bit of uphill battle.
You originally asked me for my comments, and maybe you just wanted to goad me. I took the time to first understand your points and then write down my comments.
Some day when you are in a calm mood, do read all the points I wrote down. You may disagree with me, but you wont waste your time.
Wow. You agree now, for the first time as far as I can tell, that it actually said what it said,...while qualifying your acknowledgement in "semantics"... meaning you have always read it other than written and intended, knowingly, so as to alter the message to fit your agenda. You then take your own distorted interpretation as grounds to call for violence and physical destruction of property. Those who with nothing but honorable intentions who with their own effort and funds, neither asking nor demanding anything of others, left ridiculed, threatened, accused of heresy, satanism and just generally being murderous demons. Good show, mate.
"who are these fckers to tell the surviving humanity what population they should have?" ( by the by...no where did the stones tell anyone what they "should or shouldn't" by coercion or force...more interpretation semantics' I suppose) That would be the "fuckers" who at great expense, facing excommunication, and ridicule both from those they were exposing and future beneficiary recipients of the exposure, made an effort to do something for the benefit and survival of humanity.
I read your 12 points. Do you claim any of them as your own thoughts?...or parroted thought/ statements of others? I ask because I saw nothing I hadn't seen many times before. I won't comment on them separately. In general I agree with the sentiment...in general, as applies generally to conspiratorial things across the board. None of it has jack to do with the stones or their creators other than as applied by your admitted intentional distortions and false allegations and agenda.
When I asked if you had any comments actually regarding the stones it was to clarify your intent in interceding in a thread where someone got their feelers hurt for being called on BS. I honestly had no idea I was disrupting the rumors of the good folks of Melbourne.
Now there is a good argument. I haven't been to Australia. Always had wanted to. Not likely I will. If you visit the states, I wouldn't put NG at the top of the list to visit, certainly not in terms of attractions. (The one they had is gone now anyhow). That said, it's rural. Even today it is more than 90% white Christian. In 1980 that was likely 99.9% and still very rural. Not many coming or going either. Most families on the same land for generations,...pretty much since the trail of tears. Every small community tight knit. Go to any local cemetery in any town for 5 counties around and you find headstones with my surname going back to 1700. Not the most welcoming of places. Lots of farmers, working people. God fearing family folks. Could be none of that is relevant, or maybe at the heart of it. Interesting it was generally glossed over. The stones will never be viewed as intended. The chances they would have ever been found were always deemed very low in any case. In the end I do agree this has been a better solution... their destruction that is... It was something of a surprise (likely not to everyone) they became an attraction at all. They were definitely not placed where they were to be an attraction. Of all the verbiage in all the languages and the time capsule and the astral alignments, one segment of one line..."maintain the population at 500,000,000", was continuously miss-read where in the misreading was the actual reading from the original manifesto it was taken from and accused of exposing. This was the crux of it. The exposure of elite eugenicists plans that are now in the public domain as a result of people made aware of the stones is staggering. One could argue that in the end their reach was far greater than ever imagined at their conception.
Ah the bliss of ignorance, as you clutch on to the rumours you all repeat to each other about how this amazing "brothers" who had "secret knowledge", just wanted to save humanity and nothing else, inscribed a message to the survivors of the future - not a message of hope or encouragement or empowerment, but one that told them how many of them could be allowed to survive and who gets to procreate.
Oh, the horrors these anonymous people (reminds of a typical CNN article with "anonymous sources close to the matter") must have suffered by being "ostracized" and "relieved of certain positions" - thank God they had to sacrifice only "certain positions" and not all.
The Great Awakening is gonna be much harder for those who are half awake in stupor specially created by the very same Satanic scum.
My question: Is there any difference between the average Lefty that calls for controlling the world's population based on what Schwab or Gates tells them VS someone like you, calling for the same thing for the future survivors, based on some unknown anonymous rumoured "brothers" "secret knowledge" ?
Hint: Different delivery mechanism, same brainwashing medicine.
Take care.
To people living there, I can easily imagine how important this is. For those of us looking from outside, it's simply another town with its secrets, not all benign.
I agree that literally it says "maintain" and not "reduce", but imo its simply a question of semantics. You can read it how you want.
Example: Doctor says "I should maintain my weight below 70 kgs" and I weight 100 kg. Does it mean that first I have to lose some weight, and then maintain?
To me it does, and thats how I always read this, but even if you take it literally to mean "maintain at 500 mil after a cataclysm", who are these f*ckers to tell the surviving humanity what population they should have?
I don't think you are a shill and your heart seems to be in the right place, but your methods are insanely ineffective, and hope you take this advice in the spirit its intended - Its not enough to accumulate knowledge, its also important to disseminate it, and you have shown you can indeed do it, but its a bit of uphill battle.
You originally asked me for my comments, and maybe you just wanted to goad me. I took the time to first understand your points and then write down my comments.
Some day when you are in a calm mood, do read all the points I wrote down. You may disagree with me, but you wont waste your time.
Wow. You agree now, for the first time as far as I can tell, that it actually said what it said,...while qualifying your acknowledgement in "semantics"... meaning you have always read it other than written and intended, knowingly, so as to alter the message to fit your agenda. You then take your own distorted interpretation as grounds to call for violence and physical destruction of property. Those who with nothing but honorable intentions who with their own effort and funds, neither asking nor demanding anything of others, left ridiculed, threatened, accused of heresy, satanism and just generally being murderous demons. Good show, mate. "who are these fckers to tell the surviving humanity what population they should have?" ( by the by...no where did the stones tell anyone what they "should or shouldn't" by coercion or force...more interpretation semantics' I suppose) That would be the "fuckers" who at great expense, facing excommunication, and ridicule both from those they were exposing and future beneficiary recipients of the exposure, made an effort to do something for the benefit and survival of humanity. I read your 12 points. Do you claim any of them as your own thoughts?...or parroted thought/ statements of others? I ask because I saw nothing I hadn't seen many times before. I won't comment on them separately. In general I agree with the sentiment...in general, as applies generally to conspiratorial things across the board. None of it has jack to do with the stones or their creators other than as applied by your admitted intentional distortions and false allegations and agenda. When I asked if you had any comments actually regarding the stones it was to clarify your intent in interceding in a thread where someone got their feelers hurt for being called on BS. I honestly had no idea I was disrupting the rumors of the good folks of Melbourne.