I was also pointing out that your statement "Constitution does Not Allow for a State to be made inside a State, or from part of a State or parts of States, meaning it has to be an Original State made from a Territory...." was untrue. It is conditional.
As for Lincoln, he was put in a tough situation where he had to either let the Cabal win or break the constitution. They are experts in cooking up such situations.
The only question I am interested in is whether, if he had allowed the South to secede, it would have hastened the enslavement by the Cabal or not. I strongly believe it would have.
Trump definitely learnt from this, and while people hate him for wanting to do everything by the book, this is exactly what he is trying to avoid.
Every breath we exhale should be a gratitude for the past mistakes that helps us avoid them in future.
Either the Republic is Voluntary or it is forced....
If it is Voluntary, it is a True Republic, if it is Forced, it is Not a Republic, but something else....
Call it a Democracy, or anything else, but not a Republic, as it implies True Freedom to Self Govern....
IF it is a Voluntary Republic, then States have Sovereignty, and Sovereign Rights, and in those is the Right to LEAVE the Union without encumbrances....
If they Don't, then we have Feudalism under a Sovereign, and the states have nearly no Rights, as they ALL equally lost Lincolns war....
Lincoln had way better Choices, and more choices than to simply STEAL Congress's powers, and Declare War....
But he chose POORLY, and not only did he violate the U.S. Constitution, he Violated the Law of Nations, mentioned in U.S. Constitution Article I. Legislative Branch. Section VIII. Clause X. To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
I never said he did not violate the constitution, so why are you arguing that part?
I asserted that if he did not do that the Cabal would have enslaved up much earlier. Why are you not debating that? Provide counter points, if you can.
Well, your point about Lincoln, is missing something, yes the Rothschilds planned the majority of it, yes maybe Lincoln was getting heat from the Bankers, yet again being the Rothschilds....
The split WAS planned in France about 5 years earlier, one half was to go to the Husband and the other to the Wife of two cousins who were newlyweds, maybe you knew....
But still, Lincoln did not have to STEAL the Powers from Congress, just call them to session....
As for the Cabal, well you give Lincoln way too little Credit, why would he ever go against the wishes of his superiors and Overlords??
He did exactly as ordered, and before he had a chance to Properly End the war with a formal Declaration as Commander in Chief, they had him offed....
Had he pulled the Troops out of Ft. Sumpter, and sent a stern warning to the Confederacy, he would have been assed-in a lot earlier....
He chose to obey his Masters, ignore the Banking Cabal, Murder in my estimates, about 1.8 Million Americans, and Change our Republics into a Feudalist Demonocracy....
If he had just left well enough alone, his VP would have followed orders upon seeing Lincoln get assed in, and the whole thing would've still gotten blamed on the confederacy....
So, no, it wouldn't have changed anything, Lincolns assassins were all around him, FreeMasons one and all....
I know you are very focused on all the laws Lincoln broke, but my question is simple. Whatever alternative you are arguing Lincoln could have done, would any of them have resulted in the Union being intact, or are you suggesting he should have let the country split into two?
I was also pointing out that your statement "Constitution does Not Allow for a State to be made inside a State, or from part of a State or parts of States, meaning it has to be an Original State made from a Territory...." was untrue. It is conditional.
As for Lincoln, he was put in a tough situation where he had to either let the Cabal win or break the constitution. They are experts in cooking up such situations.
The only question I am interested in is whether, if he had allowed the South to secede, it would have hastened the enslavement by the Cabal or not. I strongly believe it would have.
Trump definitely learnt from this, and while people hate him for wanting to do everything by the book, this is exactly what he is trying to avoid.
Every breath we exhale should be a gratitude for the past mistakes that helps us avoid them in future.
Is the United States a Republic or is it not??
Either the Republic is Voluntary or it is forced....
If it is Voluntary, it is a True Republic, if it is Forced, it is Not a Republic, but something else....
Call it a Democracy, or anything else, but not a Republic, as it implies True Freedom to Self Govern....
IF it is a Voluntary Republic, then States have Sovereignty, and Sovereign Rights, and in those is the Right to LEAVE the Union without encumbrances....
If they Don't, then we have Feudalism under a Sovereign, and the states have nearly no Rights, as they ALL equally lost Lincolns war....
Lincoln had way better Choices, and more choices than to simply STEAL Congress's powers, and Declare War....
But he chose POORLY, and not only did he violate the U.S. Constitution, he Violated the Law of Nations, mentioned in U.S. Constitution Article I. Legislative Branch. Section VIII. Clause X. To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
I never said he did not violate the constitution, so why are you arguing that part?
I asserted that if he did not do that the Cabal would have enslaved up much earlier. Why are you not debating that? Provide counter points, if you can.
Well, your point about Lincoln, is missing something, yes the Rothschilds planned the majority of it, yes maybe Lincoln was getting heat from the Bankers, yet again being the Rothschilds....
The split WAS planned in France about 5 years earlier, one half was to go to the Husband and the other to the Wife of two cousins who were newlyweds, maybe you knew....
But still, Lincoln did not have to STEAL the Powers from Congress, just call them to session....
As for the Cabal, well you give Lincoln way too little Credit, why would he ever go against the wishes of his superiors and Overlords??
He did exactly as ordered, and before he had a chance to Properly End the war with a formal Declaration as Commander in Chief, they had him offed....
Had he pulled the Troops out of Ft. Sumpter, and sent a stern warning to the Confederacy, he would have been assed-in a lot earlier....
He chose to obey his Masters, ignore the Banking Cabal, Murder in my estimates, about 1.8 Million Americans, and Change our Republics into a Feudalist Demonocracy....
If he had just left well enough alone, his VP would have followed orders upon seeing Lincoln get assed in, and the whole thing would've still gotten blamed on the confederacy....
So, no, it wouldn't have changed anything, Lincolns assassins were all around him, FreeMasons one and all....
I know you are very focused on all the laws Lincoln broke, but my question is simple. Whatever alternative you are arguing Lincoln could have done, would any of them have resulted in the Union being intact, or are you suggesting he should have let the country split into two?