If I'm such a wacko conspiracy theorist you would laugh at me and move on but you seem defensive and angry. You might want to question why that is. My argument stands. Too bad you're so resistive to the truth. Either way I'm not going down the rabbit hole with you and your deflection.
I'm not going to argue the validity of the moon landing with a close minded person who insulted me. I'm only interested in debating people who are beyond that pettiness. Otherwise we're both wasting our time
If I'm such a wacko conspiracy theorist you would laugh at me and move on but you seem defensive and angry. You might want to question why that is. My argument stands. Too bad you're so resistive to the truth. Either way I'm not going down the rabbit hole with you and your deflection.
you seem defensive and angry
Feel free to keep arguing with yourself. Have a good day!
How come you never answered his question about the Apollo missions?
You talk about deflection while deflecting a good point, not good optics.
I'm not going to argue the validity of the moon landing with a close minded person who insulted me. I'm only interested in debating people who are beyond that pettiness. Otherwise we're both wasting our time
So what do you have to say about the Apollo photographs of the Earth? Those are pictures of the globe.