Looks to me like they put the vax in the "placebo"

This way they get the results they want.

Yea right, it's all in everyone's head. Ahhh, maybe it's not a placebo. They'd never lie to us would they?

I don't believe anything these morons say.

Every commercial on TV is someone pushing the vax. Now it is Martha Stewart.

The team came to the conclusion that there was a nocebo effect after performing a systematic review and meta-analysisTrusted Source of 12 articles including adverse event (AE) reports for 45,380 people.

Systemic AEs were reported by 35.2 percent of those who received their first dose of a placebo, while 16.2 percent reported at least one local AE.

Systemic AEs are those that occur away from the injection site, like having a headache after receiving an injection in your arm. Local AEs occur near the injection site.

Following the second dose, 31.8 percent of study participants said they had at least one systemic AE, while 11.8 percent reported at least one local AE.

Significantly more study participants reported an AE among those who did receive the vaccine, with 46.3 percent reporting at least one systemic AE and 66.7 percent reporting at least one local AE following the initial dose.

“reports for 45,380 people”?!?! So the researchers knew that a significant portion of those 45k people received placebos while the people themselves didn’t know? That’s a pretty irresponsible experiment if it was really a dangerous pandemic that could only be defeated if we all got vaxxed. The vaxxers broke their own guidelines, because they didn’t believe their own propaganda.

Then the last paragraph I quoted above says, “Significantly more study participants reported an AE among those who did receive the vaccine,” So they admit that the adverse effects from the real vaxx were significantly more than those from their supposed nocebo effect.

I consider people who gaslight and write propaganda like this complicit. Nancy, you deserve to swing at the gallows

IMPORTANT FACT THAT IS BEING OMITTED:

There were actually 3 groups in this study.

1. the Real Vaccinated - who got the real CV-19 vaxx

2. the Unvaccinated - those who got nothing (the control group)

3. the Placebo Group that received a specifically designed shot

The 'Placebo Shot' that the study participants received was not saline as you might expect, but a specific shot, manufactured by one company to be used for the trials.

The shot did not have the vaccine ingredients, but did include something that was designed to cause irritation in those receiving it, thus causing even the Placebo recipients to report adverse events, distracting and minimizing the REAL adverse events from the poison shot.

In the animal trials, it was like a scientific three-card Monte, adding an 'intermediary' between the inoculated and the control group.

Called appropriately, the Sham Cohort.

The intent was to make the vaccinated look better than the control group!

The Naïve group (no injection) in all cases fared better than the Sham group (PLACEBO recipients), and the vaccinated animals when challenged with the disease.

In other words, it seems that they gave the animals a “placebo” Vaccine that made them less healthy than the control group, and then compared the sham animals to the vaccinated animals.

https://static-content.springer.com/.../41541_2021_324...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-021-00324-5#Fig2