This is misleading. In the article they repeat the headline, then say 986 K + died, then repeat the "excess deaths" as about 102 K. Some of these weren't excess deaths: some were expected deaths according to mortality history, apparently about 880 K, if the rest were "excess." This does not at all mean that a million people got VAIDS or regular AIDS or died due to vaccines, it implies that 102 K died.
This is misleading. In the article they repeat the headline, then say 986 K + died, then repeat the "excess deaths" as about 102 K. Some of these weren't excess deaths: some were expected deaths according to mortality history, apparently about 880 K, if the rest were "excess." This does not at all mean that a million people got VAIDS or regular AIDS or died due to vaccines, it implies that 102 K died.
You win. ⭐️ First thing I thought too.
How does a 10% higher number of deaths result in a 276% increase in the death rate?
A rate is a ratio, the other part of the ratio would have to be considered. It doesn't make sense to me, but I'm falling asleep right now too.