This is a theory that's been going around now for a couple of years and imo it's getting worse..
If you're old enough to remember, when Facebook appeared and blew up there was a large amount of real human activity on there. Myself and nearly everyone I knew were on there actively posting, writing and communicating with each other.
Fast forward to today, I don't know anyone who writes and debates with others on major social media accounts however everyone who does have social media will read comments on public topics and share the posts with others whom just like them do not participate yet share.
IMO it was during covid where they really unleashed these bots online.
I am a financial trader by trade and am part of several forums where I communicate with other traders. Well, the majority are just bots. They are designed to create sentiment towards price.
The scripts they use for these bots are getting better and better. They can blend in with various dialects and even create arguments and debates between humans.
The articles and studies are all bots. Everything online has become bot activity designed to give you an opinion and an emotional response.
Even this site is littered with bots. Any criticism of Trump or Q is met with immediate and repetitive angst and hostility. Even if the poster is just curious. On reddit it is the exact opposite. Any criticism of Obama for example is met with the same hostility.
Twitter same shit. All social media sites and forums are mostly bots now.
The bots are programmed to keep you in a state of total trust and never ending faith. Never questioning anything. Any deviation is seen as a threat and they quickly foment hatred toward you.
These scripts are extremely advanced. They can write and respond to you with human like behavior and can only be recognized with advanced language analysis models.
During the elections it was insanity the "red vs blue" narrative was unbelievable online on several platforms.
Remember the intense mask and jab debates? Well the majority of those weren't human beings online. They were bots from both ends. Any reasonable discussion between real human beings would immediately be infiltrated by a bot that would behave in an erratic and unreasonable matter often insulting one member or immediately spouting extreme responses where it would turn off one of the two humans speaking resulting in a unfinished, anger provoking dialogue.
Really think about it? How many people do you know that are active online in public debates? Or are they simply telling you what they read and sharing it?
Think about the fact that especially after covid and BLM the average person became terrified to write their true opinion online on any platform where their public name, email or identity was at risk in any fashion. This was by design to get YOU out of the debate and to live in "Read-Only" mode.
So you only have statistical probabilities but no specific evidence that people are bots if they disagree with your operation trust bullshit
That's funny cause you wrote about Operation Trust, not me. I never mentioned it once here.
There is no specific evidence for me to give it's a fact like "water is h2o" and "the sun is hot"
Do I need to fly to the sun and stick my finger in it to show you it's hot?
It is just is. You're very slow.
When you say “here”, do you mean just this thread, or all posts on GAW?
I mean throughout the website. All websites. Can post or comment. They are sentiment bots. They push narratives they are programmed to push whether they be for or against a topic(s), group or idea.
Think of that gold bot c3po from star wars and how it interacted with humans and then 10x it's capabilities online. It can mimic dialect and appear as it needs to.
You have a superior, non-boomer understanding of AI technology. Thank you for educating me. Is that what you wanted to hear? Can we move on now?
I asked about “here” in regards to this statement: “That's funny cause you wrote about Operation Trust, not me. I never mentioned it once here.”
So you didn’t mention Operation Trust on this thread until I did. Fine. Did you ever mention Operation Trust on GAW?
btw, this is retarded:
“There is no specific evidence for me to give it's a fact like "water is h2o" and "the sun is hot"
Do I need to fly to the sun and stick my finger in it to show you it's hot? It is just is.
You're very slow”
There is specific evidence that “water is h2o”. In a lab, you can combine molecules of hydrogen and molecules of oxygen in 2:1 ratios and get molecules of water. There is specific evidence that the “sun is hot”. You don’t need to use your finger, you can use thermometer technology. A fast-thinking techie like you should’ve figured that out before writing such drivel. Maybe that’s why you’re having trouble getting evidence of pro-Trump&Q bots. Maybe you haven’t thought enough about methods and tools for evidence gathering.
Everything you've written is drivel so far in this ridiculous argument. You didn't understand it at first and you're still confused to this very moment trying to make yourself feel better because I used water as an analogy. FFS man go get a life already.
What are you even trying to prove? I've told you 10 times now that bots are on every site on the internet and it's just a fact of the internet. Not an opinion. Not my opinion. But a fact.
I used hostility towards criticism as one example of their functions. There are many other functions they serve like "arguing" with "each other" to get the reader to relate to a point of view and lean to it and potentially share it with others.
During the election the "republican vs democrat" narrative was absolutely cemented and especially here. You think bots weren't promoting that? That's the box they keep you in.
Even I fell for that shit for about 10 mins.
No, you just assumed I didn’t understand because I used simple questions. Your shitty analogies are symptoms of your shitty and presumptuous thought process.
Next time you think a pro-Trump&Q commenter is a bot, point it out. I won’t demand evidence at that time, we’ll go with your hunch and take it from there and see if we can learn some more.
Right now it really looks like you’re lashing out at humans for disagreeing with your Trump-is-controlled-opposition narrative by blanket calling them bots, but without having the courage to make the accusation directly and specifically.