35
posted ago by CHAOS_ACTUAL ago by CHAOS_ACTUAL +35 / -0

17 Devices... my sides.

This is Kurt Olsen (former Navy Seal), lead attorney for Mike Lindell, trolling the shit out of Dominion's attorneys. Olsen also represents Kari Lake in her lawsuit in Arizona.

Update recent filings in Dominion v Lindell

Dominion and Lindell attorneys have been filling motions attempting to set the scope of discovery as it concerns what Lindell's attorney want to be able to have access to from a certain set of counties that used Dominion equipment to conduct the 2020 election.

Lindell's attorneys have been providing material for discovery as agreed to by the parties to Dominion.

Dominion's attorneys have been stonewalling coming to any agreement by contesting access to Dominion equipment used by certain counties, arguing the need for protective procedures to safeguard Dominion proprietary information and processes.

Lindell's attorneys are seeking subpoenas from the judge that would order a certain set of counties to turn over voting equipment and election data for inspection and analysis. Obviously, the counties are the legal owners and custodians of the equipment they have purchased to conduct elections and are the legal guardians of election information and data about the 2020 election.

Dominion is attempting to block or substantively restrict the scope of the subpoenas to the counties that would allow Lindell's attorneys and cyber experts access to the equipment because inspection and analysis would compromise Dominion's election management and tabulation software and any proprietary data stored in that equipment.

Keep in mind that Dominion is suing Lindell for defamation arguing damage from Lindell's statements about hacking and vote flipping during the 2020 election facilitated by Dominion equipment and software. Lindell's statements about vote flipping were initially based on analysis of the 32 terabytes of data that he received from Dennis Montgomery, who used Hammer and Scorecard (and probably other programs and systems) to monitor vote flipping nation wide during the 2020 election.

If Lindell were to have access to the equipment Dominion sold to states and counties and can use data gleaned in the discovery process confirming information from the 32 terabytes of data provided by Dennis Montgomery, Dominion's goose is cooked.

Lindell's motion in the District Court of Nevada to lift or constrain application of the 2007 government gag order on Dennis Montgomery from speaking about Hammer and Scorecard and other associated technologies is central to have Dennis Montgomery able to testify about Hammer and Scorecard and the 32 terabytes of data proving vote flipping in the 2020 election in the Dominion v Lindell defamation case.

If the 2007 government gag order is lifted or restricted by the judge in Nevada as only applying to the 2006 Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies case, then expect the government to attempt to have a new gag order issued. Expect a new gag order because one of Dennis Montgomery's claims is that not only does the 32 terabytes of data he provided Mike Lindell (via an intermediary) after the 2020 election show the vote flipping, but it also shows that, that portion of the vote flipping hacks that originated from China contains an electronic marker that Montgomery had inserted into a copy of the Scorecard software.

Montgomery had inserted the electronic marker into the Scorecard software that he surrendered to the FBI (unknown by the FBI) as part of an immunity agreement allowing him to seek whistleblower status from the Senate Judiciary Committee. Montgomery wanted to be able to testify about the use of the Hammer/Scorecard system / application to overturn elections in foreign countries. While Montgomery was not given the status he was seeking, the FBI did get the electronic marked Scorecard (and Hammer) programs, which were supposed to have been given to the Intel Community IG for safekeeping.

More on this subject in post below.

https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAvDTQCO/mike-lindell-china-originated-pc/

Lindell's attorneys finally had enough of the stonewalling and went to Judge Nichols and complained about the intransigence and lack of cooperation from Dominion's attorneys. Judge Nichols issued the following instruction to the parties that he wanted the two sides to try one more time to come to an agreement and provide him, in writing, summaries of what the issues are and proposals for resolving them.

From the docket...

01/10/23

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Carl J. Nichols: Status Conference held on 1/10/2023. The Court directed the parties to meet and confer no later than January 20, 2023, make a good faith effort to narrow the set of information requested of the counties and follow with the Court no later than January 27, 2023, on their agreement or respective proposals; filings shall be no more than 10 pages long.

So, on 27 January 2023, as stipulated in the above minute order, Dominion and Lindell attorneys submitted summaries and proposals of the outstanding issues as regard to discovery.

Below are links to Lindell's (Defendant) and Dominion's (Plaintiff) memorandums. They are 11 and 12 pages long respectively, so pretty quick reading.

Not prohibitively technical or in the weeds with legal expo facto inyourendo language. So don't not read these memorandum thinking it will be a slog. If interested they will catch you up to the current state of play without difficulty.

I rather liked this particular request for information by Lindell's attorneys...

"6. Copies of the bills for any cellular connection to Your ballot scanners or ballot marking devices."

Defendants Memorandum Concerning Scope of Subpoenas to Counties

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.227759/gov.uscourts.dcd.227759.157.0.pdf

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DOMINION’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.227759/gov.uscourts.dcd.227759.158.0.pdf

Link to full docket Dominion v Lindell

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59670901/us-dominion-inc-v-my-pillow-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc