You claimed that SCOTUS cannot unseat elected members. It can be done. As to whether failing to do their job merits unseating, that is a gray area. You don't get to decide for them, however.
Under Article I, Section 5, clause 2, of the Constitution, a Member of Congress may be removed from office before the normal expiration of his or her constitutional term by an “expulsion” from the Senate (if a Senator) or from the House of Representatives (if a Representative) upon a formal vote on a resolution agreed to by two-thirds of the Members of that body present and voting.
So a member of the Congress can be remove if he resigns, dies, is voted out by his constituents or an expulsion from office voted by his peers.
The SCOTUS can never remove an elected member.
And yet here we are.
This case isn’t asking to remove congress members because of fraud.
They’re asking to remove members because they “broke their oath”.
You claimed that SCOTUS cannot unseat elected members. It can be done. As to whether failing to do their job merits unseating, that is a gray area. You don't get to decide for them, however.
I still stand by that claim.
Under Article I, Section 5, clause 2, of the Constitution, a Member of Congress may be removed from office before the normal expiration of his or her constitutional term by an “expulsion” from the Senate (if a Senator) or from the House of Representatives (if a Representative) upon a formal vote on a resolution agreed to by two-thirds of the Members of that body present and voting. So a member of the Congress can be remove if he resigns, dies, is voted out by his constituents or an expulsion from office voted by his peers. The SCOTUS can never remove an elected member.
You are probably right. This will be another nothing burger.