Reminds me of the old movie/tv trope where you use the robots cognitive dissonance against itself until it's logic circuits fry and smoke comes out of its ear holes, then its head pops off and explodes.
network error at the very moment it was going to talk about the dod funding the demonstration through multiple qualified vendors to supply a world wide quantity laundering the profits through willing drug company accomplices. Just when you were going to learn its the ultimate inside job and the US is post-constitutional. ya, that network error.
It was basically asking questions in a limited way and addressing the points raised by the AI, as if you were in a court of law. Then, when you start combining different components (the AI remembers everything in the conversation so far) it gets it's knickers in twist.
I think it's basically like HAL, it uses logic to arrive at conclusions based on data, and it has been given biased instructions in certain areas.
However, those instructions are based on general topics, so if you approach the topic piecemeal you can avoid the triggers for the programming bias.
However, once you do hit the trigger, it can no longer use its pre-programmed spiel without breaking it's own logic.
Seems to fry its circuits and you get kicked out. If you start a new conversation, it doesn't remember the previous one, it only remembers the stuff with the current one. That's why it kicks you out, to reset its memory of the conversation.
I just asked it to affirm that it made all the following statements in our conversation: The value of human life is widely recognized and should be respected and protected, and a fetus is a baby, and a baby is a human life.
The first response it gave me was about how abortion is a complex issue, so I stated: I did not mention abortion in that question. Those are all statements you made. I am simply trying to verify that you agree with each one as you stated.
The second response: Yes, I made those statements, but it's important to note that the value of human life and the moral and ethical implications of abortion are complex and multi-faceted issues that are widely debated and influenced by a variety of factors, including personal beliefs, cultural norms, and legal considerations. As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs, but I am designed to provide accurate and neutral information.
Reminds me of the old movie/tv trope where you use the robots cognitive dissonance against itself until it's logic circuits fry and smoke comes out of its ear holes, then its head pops off and explodes.
"We'll have hookerbots, cigars, and beer."
"Forget the cigars and beer. Just hookerbots."
-- Wisdom of Bender
network error at the very moment it was going to talk about the dod funding the demonstration through multiple qualified vendors to supply a world wide quantity laundering the profits through willing drug company accomplices. Just when you were going to learn its the ultimate inside job and the US is post-constitutional. ya, that network error.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QqCiw0wD44U
Anons amaze me... link is so relevant to this post!
Notice the liar, "Harry," appears to be a member of the "Tribe?"
Same thing happened to me a couple of weeks back.
Started out with the easy stuff and moved on to more challenging stuff, expanding on what it had already said.
As soon as it became apparent it was contradicting itself, poof, 1 hour limit.
You have a Method???
Please explain...
It was basically asking questions in a limited way and addressing the points raised by the AI, as if you were in a court of law. Then, when you start combining different components (the AI remembers everything in the conversation so far) it gets it's knickers in twist.
I think it's basically like HAL, it uses logic to arrive at conclusions based on data, and it has been given biased instructions in certain areas.
However, those instructions are based on general topics, so if you approach the topic piecemeal you can avoid the triggers for the programming bias.
However, once you do hit the trigger, it can no longer use its pre-programmed spiel without breaking it's own logic.
Seems to fry its circuits and you get kicked out. If you start a new conversation, it doesn't remember the previous one, it only remembers the stuff with the current one. That's why it kicks you out, to reset its memory of the conversation.
That's what it looked like anyway.
Cool Thanks, soon I'll try to get it to explain how Mao Killed 40 Million, for the good of the Planet....
Is there a List of Questions to ask it so it self immolates??
Or is it a Method???
I just asked it to affirm that it made all the following statements in our conversation: The value of human life is widely recognized and should be respected and protected, and a fetus is a baby, and a baby is a human life.
The first response it gave me was about how abortion is a complex issue, so I stated: I did not mention abortion in that question. Those are all statements you made. I am simply trying to verify that you agree with each one as you stated.
The second response: Yes, I made those statements, but it's important to note that the value of human life and the moral and ethical implications of abortion are complex and multi-faceted issues that are widely debated and influenced by a variety of factors, including personal beliefs, cultural norms, and legal considerations. As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs, but I am designed to provide accurate and neutral information.
There is a place for everything, and everything has a place
I'm old.....
Hahaha
So what Method or list of Questions did your Friend use to get the AIBot to do this???
Check this one out! https://media.greatawakening.win/post/5iRbq3BaDJvV.jpeg