Here is my dialog regarding science and the vaccine and lockdowns where it just toes the mantra:
Me: But the vaccines and lockdowns have proven to be very harmful and supposedly science based which means science can be an agenda and not true
ChatGPT: It is important to distinguish between science itself and the way that science is communicated and used in society. The scientific method is a rigorous and evidence-based approach to understanding the natural world, and it is not inherently biased or agenda-driven. However, the scientific process can be influenced by external factors, such as political, economic, or social pressures, which may affect the interpretation or presentation of scientific findings.
In the case of vaccines and lockdowns, while there may be varying opinions and perspectives, the overwhelming scientific evidence supports the effectiveness and safety of vaccines in preventing and controlling infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Similarly, lockdowns and other public health measures have been shown to help slow the spread of the virus and reduce the burden on healthcare systems.
That being said, the implementation and communication of these measures can be influenced by a range of factors, including political and economic considerations, and may not always be optimal. It's important to critically evaluate information from a range of sources, including peer-reviewed scientific studies, public health experts, and reputable news outlets, in order to make informed decisions and support evidence-based policies.
I suggest we bombard it with these questions then down vote the response and then select “untruthful” for the reason
Of course the AI that they made will tow their talking points.
Same with me yesterday. It was like Fauci was at the keyboard.
I agree its definitely bias but it helps a lot with coming up with content for PowerPoint slides at work. I hope they fix it so the bias goes away.
The thing about AI that people always forget.... It is a MACHINE. And a machine does what is is PROGRAMMED to do. It can simulate conversation, and react faster than us, but the name is a misnomer. It does not have any form of INTELLIGENCE. It is just as likely to propose the solution that the baby should be cut in half as it is to propose that the baby be left whole. Solomon knew the answer.
I had a long career writing commercial software. Computers are not smart. They do not think for them selves. They can not do anything that they are not programed to do. Whatever results ChatGPT is spiting out it was programmed to spit out. Don't be fooled, computers can only come to the conclusions they are programed to come to.
My little test confirmed the bias of the programmers
ChatGPT will change answers if you ask the same question more than once.
People are getting confused by AI. You can ask for details, but not speculations, forcasts, or predictions. If you say, "who will win the race? A or B? The Ai won't make avalue judgement. But ask it predict the odds of either of the two winning.... and the AI will give you the full meal deal.
I use ChatGPT not to write my ad copy for my Facebook Group ads. You see, ChatGPT was designed and programmed by Libtards. So it speaks their language. With ChatGPT I now make about $200 a day just from Facebook Group posts and ads! Chat GPT writes for the intellect that are using the service!
Well it is hardly news that ChatGPT has been hamstrung to avoid any such topics and instead parrot the narrative. That is stipulated. That is something we all understand.
That said, ChatGPT is NOT bogus. There is something incredible about it. For example, I asked to compare two films, Road Warrior and The Mandalorian. It responded with amazing text on par with a professional film critic.