Jury's still out on her but that is absolutely correct. They falsely defined fascism as "far right" like it's the opposite of communism, when both are totalitarian and far-left. So we get a) a false dichotomy that b) manages to lump in conservatives/patriots/etc on one end of it - because of a few white supremacists (which is NOT the logical most-extreme conclusion of "right" ideology - freedom and capitalism is).
It's absolutely asinine to refer to patriots as Nazis if you stop and think about it for .25 seconds, yet this is the stupidity that the mouthbreathing masses accept widely and uncritically....
I always thought "far right" was short for "so far, right" and they just dropped the "so" and comma to make it quicker and easier to say. This is confirmation.
Every liberal and normie -- without exception -- believes that any conservative or Trump supporter who is passionate and/or vocal is "far right." Even if you're close to center or kinda liberal, you're an extremist when you start getting all uppity toward your oppressors.
For the last decade or so, no matter how far right one is on the political landscape the net movement has been closer to the center. The left is moving so far left so quickly no one with an ounce of sanity could keep up. Those on the right moving right faster than the collective left is moving left is no exception. I submit that the middle is now well into the area that once was the liberals with a lick of sense. I guess what I am trying to say is the middle is growing faster than either extreme. It usually does....eventually.
The question is: Do masses of people each of us will never meet have a birthright to our money, or not?
Yes? Then you're not in the middle.
We each have a birthright to gain the good feeling of GIVING from our heart to others as WE see fit; not have money taken from us by force for distribution as OTHERS see fit. If there were no taxes, but just love offerings instead, there would be more than enough money raised for everything govts need to do. People like the feeling of giving to what's important to them.
No? Then you're not in the middle, you're on "the right."
It gets tiring after a while, but it's still true:
We're on the right because we're IN the right. We're just right.
'Far right' now means correct. And they've only got themselves to blame for making it that way.
"hella right"
The people who throw this around have no idea what “far right “ looks like.
And that's what makes them angry!
Had a chance to meet MTG at a gathering and her comment as a response to the leftists was that she is "Extremely Right"
Jury's still out on her but that is absolutely correct. They falsely defined fascism as "far right" like it's the opposite of communism, when both are totalitarian and far-left. So we get a) a false dichotomy that b) manages to lump in conservatives/patriots/etc on one end of it - because of a few white supremacists (which is NOT the logical most-extreme conclusion of "right" ideology - freedom and capitalism is).
It's absolutely asinine to refer to patriots as Nazis if you stop and think about it for .25 seconds, yet this is the stupidity that the mouthbreathing masses accept widely and uncritically....
Right on!
I always thought "far right" was short for "so far, right" and they just dropped the "so" and comma to make it quicker and easier to say. This is confirmation.
Every liberal and normie -- without exception -- believes that any conservative or Trump supporter who is passionate and/or vocal is "far right." Even if you're close to center or kinda liberal, you're an extremist when you start getting all uppity toward your oppressors.
Definitely there are exceptions.
Far right means normal people today.
The liberal/communists are now so far left that JFK will now be known as a Republican.
Or "So Far Right"....
"Far Right" = "Not communist."
Needs to be changed to Wrong and Right instead of Left and Right.
You are SO RIGHT!!! (Thanks!)
For the last decade or so, no matter how far right one is on the political landscape the net movement has been closer to the center. The left is moving so far left so quickly no one with an ounce of sanity could keep up. Those on the right moving right faster than the collective left is moving left is no exception. I submit that the middle is now well into the area that once was the liberals with a lick of sense. I guess what I am trying to say is the middle is growing faster than either extreme. It usually does....eventually.
I don't get the "middle" though.
The question is: Do masses of people each of us will never meet have a birthright to our money, or not?
Yes? Then you're not in the middle.
We each have a birthright to gain the good feeling of GIVING from our heart to others as WE see fit; not have money taken from us by force for distribution as OTHERS see fit. If there were no taxes, but just love offerings instead, there would be more than enough money raised for everything govts need to do. People like the feeling of giving to what's important to them.
No? Then you're not in the middle, you're on "the right."
It gets tiring after a while, but it's still true:
We're on the right because we're IN the right. We're just right.