To be fair to the Shaman man, taking snapshots with 'someone' should never be grounds for guilt by association.
Shaman man has been unwitting or wittingly the mascot for the J6 narrative. I previously criticized him for being such a willing stooge and asset for the Deep State. Is he real or not.
What if he became the mascot for the J6 lies, providing a very useful focal point for both attacking Maga and Q / anons, but also, as the real information comes out an emerges, ends up totally discrediting the J6 lies, and exonerating, at least in terms of NOT being what he was labeled as (and what Maga and Q were being labeled as) and exposing the DS J6 lies?
But either way, guilt by association is the lowest of the low levels of reasoning. Disappointed this post got so many (I'm assuming) knee jerk updoogles.
To be fair to the Shaman man, taking snapshots with 'someone' should never be grounds for guilt by association.
Shaman man has been unwitting or wittingly the mascot for the J6 narrative. I previously criticized him for being such a willing stooge and asset for the Deep State. Is he real or not.
What if he became the mascot for the J6 lies, providing a very useful focal point for both attacking Maga and Q / anons, but also, as the real information comes out an emerges, ends up totally discrediting the J6 lies, and exonerating, at least in terms of NOT being what he was labeled as (and what Maga and Q were being labeled as) and exposing the DS J6 lies?
But either way, guilt by association is the lowest of the low levels of reasoning. Disappointed this post got so many (I'm assuming) knee jerk updoogles.